You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@lucene.apache.org by Nicholas Knize <nk...@gmail.com> on 2016/04/01 22:44:09 UTC

[VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 6.0.0 RC2

Please vote for the RC2 release candidate for Lucene/Solr 6.0.0.

Artifacts:


https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-6.0.0-RC2-rev48c80f91b8e5cd9b3a9b48e6184bd53e7619e7e3

Smoke tester:

  python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-6.0.0-RC2-rev48c80f91b8e5cd9b3a9b48e6184bd53e7619e7e3

Here's my +1:

SUCCESS! [0:28:59.770357]

- Nick Knize

RE: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 6.0.0 RC2

Posted by Uwe Schindler <uw...@thetaphi.de>.
Hi Jack

> Adding this less-controversial point:
>
> 5. It should have been stated explicitly that Java 1.9 is not supported at this time.

I am not sure why you want to have this in the release notes. This is completely irrelevant:

- Java 9 is not yet released, so nobody would use it in production! As we cannot look into the future it is not even sure that Java 9 will be ever released or maybe Java 10 comes earlier! :-) So we cannot make any statements about Java 9. But we also cannot say that it is not supported, because:
- As of current day, Lucene and Solr 6 are in fact compatible with Java 9 build 111 as released last week. There is only a bug in the preview build, but it is definitely compatible otherwise. The only thing that does not work is Solr's Hadoop-related stuff, but that is not Solr's fault, it is just Hadoop still on Java 6 and not taking care of upgrading. It is a kind of wonder that it works with Java 7 or 8 - really :-)

Java 9 has now the module system migrated into its core and the APIs are very stable now:
- MMapDirectory works (it does *not fully work* with Lucene 5.5). There is currently a change in the internal APIs for unmapping planned, but the current code in Lucene 6 is able to handle that. If not, nothing breaks, because MMapDirectory will just be disabled by default - thanks to the new code in Lucene 6. Lucene 5 will break horrible with Java 9.
- Lucene and Solr's tests pass, the few bugs we see are just pre-release bugs, but no technical problems. It's because Java 9 is still beta, not released
- Lucene and Solr no longer require crazy permissions granted that prevent them from the more restricted module environment in Java 9.

I can 99% ensure, Lucene 6+ will work with Java 9, once it is out. The remaining 1% is just there because you never know what the future brings: It could also happen that Lucene/Solr 5.5 or Lucene/Solr 6 won't work with Java 8 update 90 or update 100! Who knows?

So please stop arguing.

As today's state, Lucene 6 is compatible with Java 9 build 111. PERIOD.
Uwe


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 6.0.0 RC2

Posted by Jack Krupansky <ja...@gmail.com>.
-0 for my previous reasons:

1. The new points feature should have been treated as experimental in 6.0.
2. The rest of Lucene should not have been switched over to this largely
unbaked, experimental points feature so soon.
3. The current 5.x numerics should not have been deprecated so soon, with
the points numerics so unbaked and so experimental.
4. The naming and terminology of the points feature is just plain bad -
confusing/conflating scalar numeric values and spatial data.
5. Given the degree to which Solr and Lucene are linked and the prominence
of Lucene switching from current numerics to points, it would be
appropriate for Solr to explicitly note that it still uses the
5.x-compatible numerics and will continue to do so until a reasonable
migration/upgrade story for existing numeric data is in place.

Adding this less-controversial point:

5. It should have been stated explicitly that Java 1.9 is not supported at
this time.

That said, I don't expect 6.0 to be held up for any of my personal
complaints. I simply wanted to avoid anyone having the impression that I
found the current status of handling of numerics and points to be
acceptable. I don't expect any change, but I cannot say anything positive
about this state of affairs.

None of this should reflect negatively on the RM or the artifacts or
logistical process of the release.


-- Jack Krupansky

On Sat, Apr 2, 2016 at 3:19 PM, Mikhail Khludnev <mkhludnev@griddynamics.com
> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I'm not sure what I'm doing, but
>
> SUCCESS! [1:55:30.799304]
>
>
> On Fri, Apr 1, 2016 at 11:44 PM, Nicholas Knize <nk...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Please vote for the RC2 release candidate for Lucene/Solr 6.0.0.
>>
>> Artifacts:
>>
>>
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-6.0.0-RC2-rev48c80f91b8e5cd9b3a9b48e6184bd53e7619e7e3
>>
>> Smoke tester:
>>
>>   python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-6.0.0-RC2-rev48c80f91b8e5cd9b3a9b48e6184bd53e7619e7e3
>>
>> Here's my +1:
>>
>> SUCCESS! [0:28:59.770357]
>>
>> - Nick Knize
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Sincerely yours
> Mikhail Khludnev
> Principal Engineer,
> Grid Dynamics
>
> <http://www.griddynamics.com>
> <mk...@griddynamics.com>
>

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 6.0.0 RC2

Posted by Mikhail Khludnev <mk...@griddynamics.com>.
Hi,

I'm not sure what I'm doing, but

SUCCESS! [1:55:30.799304]


On Fri, Apr 1, 2016 at 11:44 PM, Nicholas Knize <nk...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Please vote for the RC2 release candidate for Lucene/Solr 6.0.0.
>
> Artifacts:
>
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-6.0.0-RC2-rev48c80f91b8e5cd9b3a9b48e6184bd53e7619e7e3
>
> Smoke tester:
>
>   python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-6.0.0-RC2-rev48c80f91b8e5cd9b3a9b48e6184bd53e7619e7e3
>
> Here's my +1:
>
> SUCCESS! [0:28:59.770357]
>
> - Nick Knize
>



-- 
Sincerely yours
Mikhail Khludnev
Principal Engineer,
Grid Dynamics

<http://www.griddynamics.com>
<mk...@griddynamics.com>

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 6.0.0 RC2

Posted by Shalin Shekhar Mangar <sh...@gmail.com>.
+1

SUCCESS! [0:34:40.873023]

On Sat, Apr 2, 2016 at 2:14 AM, Nicholas Knize <nk...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Please vote for the RC2 release candidate for Lucene/Solr 6.0.0.
>
> Artifacts:
>
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-6.0.0-RC2-rev48c80f91b8e5cd9b3a9b48e6184bd53e7619e7e3
>
> Smoke tester:
>
>   python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-6.0.0-RC2-rev48c80f91b8e5cd9b3a9b48e6184bd53e7619e7e3
>
> Here's my +1:
>
> SUCCESS! [0:28:59.770357]
>
> - Nick Knize
>



-- 
Regards,
Shalin Shekhar Mangar.

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 6.0.0 RC2

Posted by Martijn v Groningen <ma...@gmail.com>.
+1 Thanks for doing this Nick!

SUCCESS! [0:40:21.687836]

On 1 April 2016 at 22:44, Nicholas Knize <nk...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Please vote for the RC2 release candidate for Lucene/Solr 6.0.0.
>
> Artifacts:
>
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-6.0.0-RC2-rev48c80f91b8e5cd9b3a9b48e6184bd53e7619e7e3
>
> Smoke tester:
>
>   python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-6.0.0-RC2-rev48c80f91b8e5cd9b3a9b48e6184bd53e7619e7e3
>
> Here's my +1:
>
> SUCCESS! [0:28:59.770357]
>
> - Nick Knize
>



-- 
Met vriendelijke groet,

Martijn van Groningen

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 6.0.0 RC2

Posted by Steve Rowe <sa...@gmail.com>.
Aha, I bet this is related to SOLR-8724 (upgrade Solr to Zookeeper 3.4.8) - I was using locally compiled jars of 3.4.6 with extra debug printing, not sure how/why it made it to my Ivy cache, but I’m clearing it and restarting the smoke tester. Sorry for the noise.

--
Steve
www.lucidworks.com

> On Apr 4, 2016, at 10:32 AM, Steve Rowe <sa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> I got a dependency checksum failure when I ran the smoke tester, which is weird, since others have already succeeded, and I would think that the test is deterministic… I’m looking into it:
> 
> ——
> check-licenses:
>     [echo] License check under: /tmp/smoke_lucene_6.0.0_48c80f91b8e5cd9b3a9b48e6184bd53e7619e7e3/unpack/solr-6.0.0/solr
> [licenses] CHECKSUM FAILED for /tmp/smoke_lucene_6.0.0_48c80f91b8e5cd9b3a9b48e6184bd53e7619e7e3/unpack/solr-6.0.0/solr/solrj/lib/zookeeper-3.4.6.jar (expected: "01b2502e29da1ebaade2357cd1de35a855fa3755" was: "a6b3b8c19671ae58d7e3337c6fdf12d82607cfae")
> [licenses] Scanned 248 JAR file(s) for licenses (in 1.04s.), 1 error(s).
> 
> BUILD FAILED
> /tmp/smoke_lucene_6.0.0_48c80f91b8e5cd9b3a9b48e6184bd53e7619e7e3/unpack/solr-6.0.0/build.xml:117: The following error occurred while executing this line:
> /tmp/smoke_lucene_6.0.0_48c80f91b8e5cd9b3a9b48e6184bd53e7619e7e3/unpack/solr-6.0.0/solr/build.xml:330: The following error occurred while executing this line:
> /tmp/smoke_lucene_6.0.0_48c80f91b8e5cd9b3a9b48e6184bd53e7619e7e3/unpack/solr-6.0.0/lucene/tools/custom-tasks.xml:62: License check failed. Check the logs.
> If you recently modified ivy-versions.properties or any module's ivy.xml,
> make sure you run "ant clean-jars jar-checksums" before running precommit.
> ——
> 
> --
> Steve
> www.lucdiworks.com
> 
> On Apr 1, 2016, at 4:44 PM, Nicholas Knize <nk...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> Please vote for the RC2 release candidate for Lucene/Solr 6.0.0.
>> 
>> Artifacts:
>> 
>>  https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-6.0.0-RC2-rev48c80f91b8e5cd9b3a9b48e6184bd53e7619e7e3
>> 
>> Smoke tester:
>> 
>>  python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-6.0.0-RC2-rev48c80f91b8e5cd9b3a9b48e6184bd53e7619e7e3
>> 
>> Here's my +1:
>> 
>> SUCCESS! [0:28:59.770357]
>> 
>> - Nick Knize
> 


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 6.0.0 RC2

Posted by Steve Rowe <sa...@gmail.com>.
I got a dependency checksum failure when I ran the smoke tester, which is weird, since others have already succeeded, and I would think that the test is deterministic… I’m looking into it:

——
check-licenses:
     [echo] License check under: /tmp/smoke_lucene_6.0.0_48c80f91b8e5cd9b3a9b48e6184bd53e7619e7e3/unpack/solr-6.0.0/solr
 [licenses] CHECKSUM FAILED for /tmp/smoke_lucene_6.0.0_48c80f91b8e5cd9b3a9b48e6184bd53e7619e7e3/unpack/solr-6.0.0/solr/solrj/lib/zookeeper-3.4.6.jar (expected: "01b2502e29da1ebaade2357cd1de35a855fa3755" was: "a6b3b8c19671ae58d7e3337c6fdf12d82607cfae")
 [licenses] Scanned 248 JAR file(s) for licenses (in 1.04s.), 1 error(s).

BUILD FAILED
/tmp/smoke_lucene_6.0.0_48c80f91b8e5cd9b3a9b48e6184bd53e7619e7e3/unpack/solr-6.0.0/build.xml:117: The following error occurred while executing this line:
/tmp/smoke_lucene_6.0.0_48c80f91b8e5cd9b3a9b48e6184bd53e7619e7e3/unpack/solr-6.0.0/solr/build.xml:330: The following error occurred while executing this line:
/tmp/smoke_lucene_6.0.0_48c80f91b8e5cd9b3a9b48e6184bd53e7619e7e3/unpack/solr-6.0.0/lucene/tools/custom-tasks.xml:62: License check failed. Check the logs.
If you recently modified ivy-versions.properties or any module's ivy.xml,
make sure you run "ant clean-jars jar-checksums" before running precommit.
——

--
Steve
www.lucdiworks.com

On Apr 1, 2016, at 4:44 PM, Nicholas Knize <nk...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> 
> Please vote for the RC2 release candidate for Lucene/Solr 6.0.0.
> 
> Artifacts:
> 
>   https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-6.0.0-RC2-rev48c80f91b8e5cd9b3a9b48e6184bd53e7619e7e3
> 
> Smoke tester:
> 
>   python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-6.0.0-RC2-rev48c80f91b8e5cd9b3a9b48e6184bd53e7619e7e3
> 
> Here's my +1:
> 
> SUCCESS! [0:28:59.770357]
> 
> - Nick Knize


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 6.0.0 RC2

Posted by Steve Rowe <sa...@gmail.com>.
FYI there is a reproducing failure in lucene/spatial on branch_6_0: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7172

--
Steve
www.lucidworks.com

> On Apr 1, 2016, at 4:44 PM, Nicholas Knize <nk...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Please vote for the RC2 release candidate for Lucene/Solr 6.0.0.
> 
> Artifacts:
> 
>   https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-6.0.0-RC2-rev48c80f91b8e5cd9b3a9b48e6184bd53e7619e7e3
> 
> Smoke tester:
> 
>   python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-6.0.0-RC2-rev48c80f91b8e5cd9b3a9b48e6184bd53e7619e7e3
> 
> Here's my +1:
> 
> SUCCESS! [0:28:59.770357]
> 
> - Nick Knize


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 6.0.0 RC2

Posted by Steve Rowe <sa...@gmail.com>.
+1 

Docs, changes and javadocs look good, except that there is a 5.5.1 section in Solr’s CHANGES.txt, but there shouldn’t be (shouldn’t block release, IMO).

Smoke tester: SUCCESS! [0:24:05.242799]

--
Steve
www.lucidworks.com

> On Apr 1, 2016, at 4:44 PM, Nicholas Knize <nk...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Please vote for the RC2 release candidate for Lucene/Solr 6.0.0.
> 
> Artifacts:
> 
>   https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-6.0.0-RC2-rev48c80f91b8e5cd9b3a9b48e6184bd53e7619e7e3
> 
> Smoke tester:
> 
>   python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-6.0.0-RC2-rev48c80f91b8e5cd9b3a9b48e6184bd53e7619e7e3
> 
> Here's my +1:
> 
> SUCCESS! [0:28:59.770357]
> 
> - Nick Knize


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 6.0.0 RC2

Posted by Joel Bernstein <jo...@gmail.com>.
+1

SUCCESS! [0:57:25.723824]

Joel Bernstein
http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/

On Tue, Apr 5, 2016 at 12:22 PM, Tomás Fernández Löbbe <
tomasflobbe@gmail.com> wrote:

> +1
> SUCCESS! [0:46:58.614256]
>
> On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 6:26 PM, Ahmet Arslan <io...@yahoo.com.invalid>
> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> +1
>> SUCCESS! [1:42:49.802039]
>> Ahmet
>>
>>
>> On Tuesday, April 5, 2016 1:09 AM, Anshum Gupta <an...@anshumgupta.net>
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> Thanks for taking this up Nick!
>>
>> Here's my +1:
>>
>> SUCCESS! [0:38:14.023246]
>>
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Apr 1, 2016 at 1:44 PM, Nicholas Knize <nk...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Please vote for the RC2 release candidate for Lucene/Solr 6.0.0.
>> >
>> >Artifacts:
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-6.0.0-RC2-rev48c80f91b8e5cd9b3a9b48e6184bd53e7619e7e3
>> >
>> >
>> >Smoke tester:
>> >
>> >
>> >  python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-6.0.0-RC2-rev48c80f91b8e5cd9b3a9b48e6184bd53e7619e7e3
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >Here's my +1:
>> >
>> >
>> >SUCCESS! [0:28:59.770357]
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >- Nick Knize
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>> Anshum Gupta
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>>
>>
>

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 6.0.0 RC2

Posted by Tomás Fernández Löbbe <to...@gmail.com>.
+1
SUCCESS! [0:46:58.614256]

On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 6:26 PM, Ahmet Arslan <io...@yahoo.com.invalid>
wrote:

>
>
> +1
> SUCCESS! [1:42:49.802039]
> Ahmet
>
>
> On Tuesday, April 5, 2016 1:09 AM, Anshum Gupta <an...@anshumgupta.net>
> wrote:
>
>
>
> Thanks for taking this up Nick!
>
> Here's my +1:
>
> SUCCESS! [0:38:14.023246]
>
>
>
> On Fri, Apr 1, 2016 at 1:44 PM, Nicholas Knize <nk...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Please vote for the RC2 release candidate for Lucene/Solr 6.0.0.
> >
> >Artifacts:
> >
> >
> >
> >
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-6.0.0-RC2-rev48c80f91b8e5cd9b3a9b48e6184bd53e7619e7e3
> >
> >
> >Smoke tester:
> >
> >
> >  python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-6.0.0-RC2-rev48c80f91b8e5cd9b3a9b48e6184bd53e7619e7e3
> >
> >
> >
> >Here's my +1:
> >
> >
> >SUCCESS! [0:28:59.770357]
> >
> >
> >
> >- Nick Knize
>
>
> --
>
> Anshum Gupta
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>
>

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 6.0.0 RC2

Posted by Ahmet Arslan <io...@yahoo.com.INVALID>.

+1
SUCCESS! [1:42:49.802039]
Ahmet


On Tuesday, April 5, 2016 1:09 AM, Anshum Gupta <an...@anshumgupta.net> wrote:



Thanks for taking this up Nick!

Here's my +1:

SUCCESS! [0:38:14.023246]



On Fri, Apr 1, 2016 at 1:44 PM, Nicholas Knize <nk...@gmail.com> wrote:

Please vote for the RC2 release candidate for Lucene/Solr 6.0.0.
>
>Artifacts:
>
>
>
>  https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-6.0.0-RC2-rev48c80f91b8e5cd9b3a9b48e6184bd53e7619e7e3
>
>
>Smoke tester:
>
>
>  python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-6.0.0-RC2-rev48c80f91b8e5cd9b3a9b48e6184bd53e7619e7e3
>
>
>
>Here's my +1:
>
>
>SUCCESS! [0:28:59.770357]
>
>
>
>- Nick Knize


-- 

Anshum Gupta

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 6.0.0 RC2

Posted by Anshum Gupta <an...@anshumgupta.net>.
Thanks for taking this up Nick!

Here's my +1:

SUCCESS! [0:38:14.023246]

On Fri, Apr 1, 2016 at 1:44 PM, Nicholas Knize <nk...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Please vote for the RC2 release candidate for Lucene/Solr 6.0.0.
>
> Artifacts:
>
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-6.0.0-RC2-rev48c80f91b8e5cd9b3a9b48e6184bd53e7619e7e3
>
> Smoke tester:
>
>   python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-6.0.0-RC2-rev48c80f91b8e5cd9b3a9b48e6184bd53e7619e7e3
>
> Here's my +1:
>
> SUCCESS! [0:28:59.770357]
>
> - Nick Knize
>



-- 
Anshum Gupta

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 6.0.0 RC2

Posted by Michael McCandless <lu...@mikemccandless.com>.
+1

SUCCESS! [0:33:01.168718]

Mike McCandless

http://blog.mikemccandless.com


On Fri, Apr 1, 2016 at 4:44 PM, Nicholas Knize <nk...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Please vote for the RC2 release candidate for Lucene/Solr 6.0.0.
>
> Artifacts:
>
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-6.0.0-RC2-rev48c80f91b8e5cd9b3a9b48e6184bd53e7619e7e3
>
> Smoke tester:
>
>   python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-6.0.0-RC2-rev48c80f91b8e5cd9b3a9b48e6184bd53e7619e7e3
>
> Here's my +1:
>
> SUCCESS! [0:28:59.770357]
>
> - Nick Knize

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org