You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@sling.apache.org by Felix Meschberger <fm...@gmail.com> on 2007/11/06 11:29:08 UTC
[RESULT] [VOTE] Sling API
Hi all,
The vote for the new Sling API to replace the former Component API is
now closed with the following result (* marks binding votes):
*Felix Meschberger +1
*Betrand Delacretaz +1
*Juanjo Velazquez +1
*Carsten Ziegeler +1
*Christophe Lombart +1
Torgeir Veimo +1
This vote passes with 6 (5 of which binding) +1 votes and no veto. Thank
you all for voting.
I will now create a branch of the current Sling state as
Sling_Component_API start reorganizing the trunk according to Module
Reorganization Proposal [1]. Next I will start porting the code to the
new Sling API.
Regards
Felix
[1] http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/x/6REB
Am Freitag, den 02.11.2007, 09:38 +0100 schrieb Felix Meschberger:
> Hi all,
>
> Finally after much fiddling around on the Sling API and its "reference
> implementation" microsling, I would like to start the vote on the Sling
> API. This vote is not to cast the Sling API in stone for the next 2000
> years but to ack that it is in a good enough shape as to warrant
> refactoring of Sling to the new Sling API and drop the Component API.
>
> [ ] +1 Sling API is good enough to refactor Sling
> [ ] 0
> [ ] -1 Sling API is not good enough, keep the old Component API
>
> Everyone is invited to vote. The vote passes with at least three binding
> +1 votes and no -1 votes (vetoes). The vote is open until Thuesday, 8
> AM, CET.
>
> Thanks and Regards
> Felix