You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@spamassassin.apache.org by bu...@bugzilla.spamassassin.org on 2006/03/09 02:12:26 UTC
[Bug 4821] New: rule name duplication is not prevented
http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=4821
Summary: rule name duplication is not prevented
Product: Spamassassin
Version: SVN Trunk (Latest Devel Version)
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P5
Component: Libraries
AssignedTo: dev@spamassassin.apache.org
ReportedBy: spamassassin@dostech.ca
Using the following in a cf file should probably cause a minimum of a lint warning:
header TEST Content-Type =~ /./
header TEST Content-Type =~ /./
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
[Bug 4821] rule name duplication is not prevented
Posted by bu...@bugzilla.spamassassin.org.
http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=4821
spamassassin@dostech.ca changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|Undefined |3.2.0
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
[Bug 4821] rule name duplication is not prevented
Posted by bu...@bugzilla.spamassassin.org.
http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=4821
------- Additional Comments From spamassassin@dostech.ca 2006-03-09 02:00 -------
I think an extended lint, such as lint warnings only thrown when --lint -D is
used, is what I've got in mind. See bug 3340 comment 18.
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
[Bug 4821] rule name duplication is not prevented
Posted by bu...@bugzilla.spamassassin.org.
http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=4821
------- Additional Comments From jgmyers@proofpoint.com 2006-03-09 01:19 -------
I use site_rules_path config files to override the definitions of rules defined
in the default_rules_path config files. I would appreciate it if this would
continue to work.
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
[Bug 4821] issue debug message if rule name duplication is detected
Posted by bu...@bugzilla.spamassassin.org.
http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=4821
jm@jmason.org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Summary|rule name duplication is not|issue debug message if rule
|prevented |name duplication is detected
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
[Bug 4821] issue debug message if rule name duplication is detected
Posted by bu...@bugzilla.spamassassin.org.
http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=4821
jm@jmason.org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Severity|normal |enhancement
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
[Bug 4821] rule name duplication is not prevented
Posted by bu...@bugzilla.spamassassin.org.
http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=4821
------- Additional Comments From spamassassin@dostech.ca 2008-01-02 15:23 -------
I don't want to prevent it, but I'd like to provide debug info about it if
-Drules is used.
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
[Bug 4821] rule name duplication is not prevented
Posted by bu...@bugzilla.spamassassin.org.
http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=4821
------- Additional Comments From jm@jmason.org 2008-01-02 15:25 -------
(In reply to comment #6)
> I don't want to prevent it, but I'd like to provide debug info about it if
> -Drules is used.
ok, that makes sense. (sorry, I missed that you referred to needing -D in
comment 2)
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
[Bug 4821] rule name duplication is not prevented
Posted by bu...@bugzilla.spamassassin.org.
http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=4821
jm@jmason.org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|3.2.0 |Future
------- Additional Comments From jm@jmason.org 2006-12-05 05:46 -------
I'm inclined to close this as WONTFIX -- as John notes, it has its uses. punting
from 3.2.0 anyway...
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
[Bug 4821] rule name duplication is not prevented
Posted by bu...@bugzilla.spamassassin.org.
http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=4821
------- Additional Comments From jm@jmason.org 2008-01-02 14:42 -------
Daryl: mind if we WONTFIX this? the more I think about it, the more it seems a
useful side-effect.
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
[Bug 4821] rule name duplication is not prevented
Posted by bu...@bugzilla.spamassassin.org.
http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=4821
jm@jmason.org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|Future |3.3.0
------- Additional Comments From jm@jmason.org 2006-12-05 06:10 -------
really move this time
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.