You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to rampart-dev@ws.apache.org by Ruchith Fernando <ru...@apache.org> on 2007/11/14 17:37:22 UTC
[VOTE] Nanada Mihindukulasooriya as a committer
Hi All,
I'd like to propose Nanada Mihindukulasooriya as a WS committer.
Nandana has submitted a number of patches to both Rampart and WSS4J
projects[1]. Also he has demonstrated that he possesses a very good
understanding of the all WS-Sec* specifications.
Apache Rampart was able to interop successfully with MSFT WCF in all
WS-Security 1.0, WS-Security 1.1 and WS-SecureConversation
specifications and it wouldn't have been possible without Nandana's
valuable contributions.
I'm sure he will continue to help us improve Apache Rampart and here's
my +1 to bring him on board as a committer.
Thanks,
Ruchith
--
http://blog.ruchith.org
http://wso2.org
1.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=true&&reporterSelect=specificuser&reporter=nandana.cse&sorter/field=issuekey&sorter/order=DESC
Re: [VOTE] Nanada Mihindukulasooriya as a committer
Posted by Deepal jayasinghe <de...@gmail.com>.
+1 from me.
Deepal
> Hi All,
>
> I'd like to propose Nanada Mihindukulasooriya as a WS committer.
> Nandana has submitted a number of patches to both Rampart and WSS4J
> projects[1]. Also he has demonstrated that he possesses a very good
> understanding of the all WS-Sec* specifications.
>
Btw when I looked at the JIRA I saw that Nandana has a number of JIRA
assigned to him , AFAIK we can not assign JIRA to a developer unless he
is a commiter in the project.
> Apache Rampart was able to interop successfully with MSFT WCF in all
> WS-Security 1.0, WS-Security 1.1 and WS-SecureConversation
> specifications and it wouldn't have been possible without Nandana's
> valuable contributions.
>
> I'm sure he will continue to help us improve Apache Rampart and here's
> my +1 to bring him on board as a committer.
>
> Thanks,
> Ruchith
>
Re: [VOTE] Nandana Mihindukulasooriya as a committer
Posted by Hans Guldager Knudsen <hg...@lenio.dk>.
+1
/hans
Ruchith Fernando wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I'd like to propose Nanada Mihindukulasooriya as a WS committer.
> Nandana has submitted a number of patches to both Rampart and WSS4J
> projects[1]. Also he has demonstrated that he possesses a very good
> understanding of the all WS-Sec* specifications.
>
> Apache Rampart was able to interop successfully with MSFT WCF in all
> WS-Security 1.0, WS-Security 1.1 and WS-SecureConversation
> specifications and it wouldn't have been possible without Nandana's
> valuable contributions.
>
> I'm sure he will continue to help us improve Apache Rampart and here's
> my +1 to bring him on board as a committer.
>
> Thanks,
> Ruchith
>
Re: [VOTE] Nanada Mihindukulasooriya as a committer
Posted by Kaushalye Kapuruge <ka...@wso2.com>.
Here is my +1.
Kaushalye
Ruchith Fernando wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I'd like to propose Nanada Mihindukulasooriya as a WS committer.
> Nandana has submitted a number of patches to both Rampart and WSS4J
> projects[1]. Also he has demonstrated that he possesses a very good
> understanding of the all WS-Sec* specifications.
>
> Apache Rampart was able to interop successfully with MSFT WCF in all
> WS-Security 1.0, WS-Security 1.1 and WS-SecureConversation
> specifications and it wouldn't have been possible without Nandana's
> valuable contributions.
>
> I'm sure he will continue to help us improve Apache Rampart and here's
> my +1 to bring him on board as a committer.
>
> Thanks,
> Ruchith
>
--
http://blog.kaushalye.org/
http://wso2.org/
Re: [VOTE] Nandana Mihindukulasooriya as a committer (was: [VOTE]
Nanada Mihindukulasooriya as a committer)
Posted by Dimuthu Leelarathne <di...@wso2.com>.
Hi,
Here is my +1
Regards,
Dimuthu.
On Thu, 2007-11-15 at 00:17 +0530, Ruchith Fernando wrote:
> Oops !
>
> s/Nanada/Nandana
>
> +1 for Nandana as a committer! :-)
>
> Thanks,
> Ruchith
>
> Ruchith Fernando wrote:
> > Hi All,
> >
> > I'd like to propose Nanada Mihindukulasooriya as a WS committer.
> > Nandana has submitted a number of patches to both Rampart and WSS4J
> > projects[1]. Also he has demonstrated that he possesses a very good
> > understanding of the all WS-Sec* specifications.
> >
> > Apache Rampart was able to interop successfully with MSFT WCF in all
> > WS-Security 1.0, WS-Security 1.1 and WS-SecureConversation
> > specifications and it wouldn't have been possible without Nandana's
> > valuable contributions.
> >
> > I'm sure he will continue to help us improve Apache Rampart and here's
> > my +1 to bring him on board as a committer.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Ruchith
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Nandana Mihindukulasooriya as a committer (was: [VOTE]
Nanada Mihindukulasooriya as a committer)
Posted by Manjula Peiris <ma...@wso2.com>.
+1
-Manjula.
On Thu, 2007-11-15 at 00:17 +0530, Ruchith Fernando wrote:
> Oops !
>
> s/Nanada/Nandana
>
> +1 for Nandana as a committer! :-)
>
> Thanks,
> Ruchith
>
> Ruchith Fernando wrote:
> > Hi All,
> >
> > I'd like to propose Nanada Mihindukulasooriya as a WS committer.
> > Nandana has submitted a number of patches to both Rampart and WSS4J
> > projects[1]. Also he has demonstrated that he possesses a very good
> > understanding of the all WS-Sec* specifications.
> >
> > Apache Rampart was able to interop successfully with MSFT WCF in all
> > WS-Security 1.0, WS-Security 1.1 and WS-SecureConversation
> > specifications and it wouldn't have been possible without Nandana's
> > valuable contributions.
> >
> > I'm sure he will continue to help us improve Apache Rampart and here's
> > my +1 to bring him on board as a committer.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Ruchith
>
>
RE: [VOTE] Nandana Mihindukulasooriya as a committer (was: [VOTE] Nanada Mihindukulasooriya as a committer)
Posted by Raghu Upadhyayula <ru...@responsys.com>.
+1
Thanks
Raghu
-----Original Message-----
From: Thilina Gunarathne [mailto:csethil@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2007 5:02 AM
To: rampart-dev@ws.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Nandana Mihindukulasooriya as a committer (was:
[VOTE] Nanada Mihindukulasooriya as a committer)
+1...
thanks,
Thilina
On Nov 15, 2007 12:30 AM, Ruwan Linton <ru...@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1
>
> Thanks,
> Ruwan
>
>
> On Nov 15, 2007 10:57 AM, Afkham Azeez <af...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > +1 for Nandana
> >
> > Azeez
> >
> > On Nov 15, 2007 12:17 AM, Ruchith Fernando <ru...@apache.org>
wrote:
> >
> > > Oops !
> > >
> > > s/Nanada/Nandana
> > >
> > > +1 for Nandana as a committer! :-)
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Ruchith
> > >
> > > Ruchith Fernando wrote:
> > > > Hi All,
> > > >
> > > > I'd like to propose Nanada Mihindukulasooriya as a WS committer.
> > > > Nandana has submitted a number of patches to both Rampart and
WSS4J
> > > > projects[1]. Also he has demonstrated that he possesses a very
good
> > > > understanding of the all WS-Sec* specifications.
> > > >
> > > > Apache Rampart was able to interop successfully with MSFT WCF in
all
> > > > WS-Security 1.0, WS-Security 1.1 and WS-SecureConversation
> > > > specifications and it wouldn't have been possible without
Nandana's
> > > > valuable contributions.
> > > >
> > > > I'm sure he will continue to help us improve Apache Rampart and
here's
> > > > my +1 to bring him on board as a committer.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > Ruchith
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Thanks
> > Afkham Azeez
> >
> > http://www.wso2.org
> > GPG Fingerprint: 643F C2AF EB78 F886 40C9 B2A2 4AE2 C887 665E 0760
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Ruwan Linton
> http://www.wso2.org - "Oxygenating the Web Services Platform"
>
--
Thilina Gunarathne - http://thilinag.blogspot.com
Re: [VOTE] Nandana Mihindukulasooriya as a committer (was: [VOTE] Nanada Mihindukulasooriya as a committer)
Posted by Thilina Gunarathne <cs...@gmail.com>.
+1...
thanks,
Thilina
On Nov 15, 2007 12:30 AM, Ruwan Linton <ru...@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1
>
> Thanks,
> Ruwan
>
>
> On Nov 15, 2007 10:57 AM, Afkham Azeez <af...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > +1 for Nandana
> >
> > Azeez
> >
> > On Nov 15, 2007 12:17 AM, Ruchith Fernando <ru...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > > Oops !
> > >
> > > s/Nanada/Nandana
> > >
> > > +1 for Nandana as a committer! :-)
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Ruchith
> > >
> > > Ruchith Fernando wrote:
> > > > Hi All,
> > > >
> > > > I'd like to propose Nanada Mihindukulasooriya as a WS committer.
> > > > Nandana has submitted a number of patches to both Rampart and WSS4J
> > > > projects[1]. Also he has demonstrated that he possesses a very good
> > > > understanding of the all WS-Sec* specifications.
> > > >
> > > > Apache Rampart was able to interop successfully with MSFT WCF in all
> > > > WS-Security 1.0, WS-Security 1.1 and WS-SecureConversation
> > > > specifications and it wouldn't have been possible without Nandana's
> > > > valuable contributions.
> > > >
> > > > I'm sure he will continue to help us improve Apache Rampart and here's
> > > > my +1 to bring him on board as a committer.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > Ruchith
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Thanks
> > Afkham Azeez
> >
> > http://www.wso2.org
> > GPG Fingerprint: 643F C2AF EB78 F886 40C9 B2A2 4AE2 C887 665E 0760
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Ruwan Linton
> http://www.wso2.org - "Oxygenating the Web Services Platform"
>
--
Thilina Gunarathne - http://thilinag.blogspot.com
Re: [VOTE] Nandana Mihindukulasooriya as a committer (was: [VOTE] Nanada Mihindukulasooriya as a committer)
Posted by Ruwan Linton <ru...@gmail.com>.
+1
Thanks,
Ruwan
On Nov 15, 2007 10:57 AM, Afkham Azeez <af...@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1 for Nandana
>
> Azeez
>
> On Nov 15, 2007 12:17 AM, Ruchith Fernando <ru...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > Oops !
> >
> > s/Nanada/Nandana
> >
> > +1 for Nandana as a committer! :-)
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Ruchith
> >
> > Ruchith Fernando wrote:
> > > Hi All,
> > >
> > > I'd like to propose Nanada Mihindukulasooriya as a WS committer.
> > > Nandana has submitted a number of patches to both Rampart and WSS4J
> > > projects[1]. Also he has demonstrated that he possesses a very good
> > > understanding of the all WS-Sec* specifications.
> > >
> > > Apache Rampart was able to interop successfully with MSFT WCF in all
> > > WS-Security 1.0, WS-Security 1.1 and WS-SecureConversation
> > > specifications and it wouldn't have been possible without Nandana's
> > > valuable contributions.
> > >
> > > I'm sure he will continue to help us improve Apache Rampart and here's
> > > my +1 to bring him on board as a committer.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Ruchith
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Thanks
> Afkham Azeez
>
> http://www.wso2.org
> GPG Fingerprint: 643F C2AF EB78 F886 40C9 B2A2 4AE2 C887 665E 0760
>
--
Ruwan Linton
http://www.wso2.org - "Oxygenating the Web Services Platform"
Re: [VOTE] Nandana Mihindukulasooriya as a committer (was: [VOTE] Nanada Mihindukulasooriya as a committer)
Posted by Afkham Azeez <af...@gmail.com>.
+1 for Nandana
Azeez
On Nov 15, 2007 12:17 AM, Ruchith Fernando <ru...@apache.org> wrote:
> Oops !
>
> s/Nanada/Nandana
>
> +1 for Nandana as a committer! :-)
>
> Thanks,
> Ruchith
>
> Ruchith Fernando wrote:
> > Hi All,
> >
> > I'd like to propose Nanada Mihindukulasooriya as a WS committer.
> > Nandana has submitted a number of patches to both Rampart and WSS4J
> > projects[1]. Also he has demonstrated that he possesses a very good
> > understanding of the all WS-Sec* specifications.
> >
> > Apache Rampart was able to interop successfully with MSFT WCF in all
> > WS-Security 1.0, WS-Security 1.1 and WS-SecureConversation
> > specifications and it wouldn't have been possible without Nandana's
> > valuable contributions.
> >
> > I'm sure he will continue to help us improve Apache Rampart and here's
> > my +1 to bring him on board as a committer.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Ruchith
>
>
>
--
Thanks
Afkham Azeez
http://www.wso2.org
GPG Fingerprint: 643F C2AF EB78 F886 40C9 B2A2 4AE2 C887 665E 0760
[VOTE] Nandana Mihindukulasooriya as a committer (was: [VOTE] Nanada
Mihindukulasooriya as a committer)
Posted by Ruchith Fernando <ru...@apache.org>.
Oops !
s/Nanada/Nandana
+1 for Nandana as a committer! :-)
Thanks,
Ruchith
Ruchith Fernando wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I'd like to propose Nanada Mihindukulasooriya as a WS committer.
> Nandana has submitted a number of patches to both Rampart and WSS4J
> projects[1]. Also he has demonstrated that he possesses a very good
> understanding of the all WS-Sec* specifications.
>
> Apache Rampart was able to interop successfully with MSFT WCF in all
> WS-Security 1.0, WS-Security 1.1 and WS-SecureConversation
> specifications and it wouldn't have been possible without Nandana's
> valuable contributions.
>
> I'm sure he will continue to help us improve Apache Rampart and here's
> my +1 to bring him on board as a committer.
>
> Thanks,
> Ruchith