You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@activemq.apache.org by Hiram Chirino <hi...@hiramchirino.com> on 2009/06/11 15:36:41 UTC
ActiveMQ 6 Codename?
Hi Guys,
So while working on the ActiveMQ flow module which I hope one day will
be come ActiveMQ 6, I realized that I'm going to need a new package
name space to hold all the new bits to avoid clashing with the 5.x
classes in cases where users have both products in the same classpath.
I decided to use 'org.apache.activemq.apollo' for now.
This is similar to what the Tomcat project when through when they
developed the catalina based tomcat engine. So, just to avoid a bit
package refactor in the future, I'd like your input what you think
would be a good code name for the ActiveMQ 6 code base? Lets try to
keep it concise as it will be used in package names.
My favorites so far would be:
apollo
puma
--
Regards,
Hiram
Blog: http://hiramchirino.com
Open Source SOA
http://fusesource.com/
Re: ActiveMQ 6 Codename?
Posted by Dejan Bosanac <de...@nighttale.net>.
While we are in the real of greek gods
ANGELIA was the daimona (spirit) of messages, tidings and proclamations. -
http://www.theoi.com/Daimon/Angelia.html
IRIS was the goddess of the rainbow, the messenger of the Olympian gods. -
http://www.theoi.com/Pontios/Iris.html
:)
Cheers
--
Dejan Bosanac
Open Source Integration - http://fusesource.com/
ActiveMQ in Action - http://www.manning.com/snyder/
Blog - http://www.nighttale.net
On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 12:32 PM, Gary Tully <ga...@gmail.com> wrote:
> EUNOMIA was the
> goddess<http://www.theoi.com/greek-mythology/olympian-gods.html>of
> good order, but it is a bit on the long side,
> how about: 'euno'
>
> 2009/6/18 Hiram Chirino <hi...@hiramchirino.com>
>
> > Any other thoughts out there?
> >
> > On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 9:36 AM, Hiram Chirino <hiram@hiramchirino.com
> > >wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Guys,
> > >
> > > So while working on the ActiveMQ flow module which I hope one day will
> > > be come ActiveMQ 6, I realized that I'm going to need a new package
> > > name space to hold all the new bits to avoid clashing with the 5.x
> > > classes in cases where users have both products in the same classpath.
> > > I decided to use 'org.apache.activemq.apollo' for now.
> > > This is similar to what the Tomcat project when through when they
> > > developed the catalina based tomcat engine. So, just to avoid a bit
> > > package refactor in the future, I'd like your input what you think
> > > would be a good code name for the ActiveMQ 6 code base? Lets try to
> > > keep it concise as it will be used in package names.
> > >
> > > My favorites so far would be:
> > > apollo
> > > puma
> > >
> > > --
> > > Regards,
> > > Hiram
> > >
> > > Blog: http://hiramchirino.com
> > >
> > > Open Source SOA
> > > http://fusesource.com/
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Regards,
> > Hiram
> >
> > Blog: http://hiramchirino.com
> >
> > Open Source SOA
> > http://fusesource.com/
> >
>
>
>
> --
> http://blog.garytully.com
>
> Open Source Integration
> http://fusesource.com
>
Re: ActiveMQ 6 Codename?
Posted by Gary Tully <ga...@gmail.com>.
EUNOMIA was the
goddess<http://www.theoi.com/greek-mythology/olympian-gods.html>of
good order, but it is a bit on the long side,
how about: 'euno'
2009/6/18 Hiram Chirino <hi...@hiramchirino.com>
> Any other thoughts out there?
>
> On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 9:36 AM, Hiram Chirino <hiram@hiramchirino.com
> >wrote:
>
> > Hi Guys,
> >
> > So while working on the ActiveMQ flow module which I hope one day will
> > be come ActiveMQ 6, I realized that I'm going to need a new package
> > name space to hold all the new bits to avoid clashing with the 5.x
> > classes in cases where users have both products in the same classpath.
> > I decided to use 'org.apache.activemq.apollo' for now.
> > This is similar to what the Tomcat project when through when they
> > developed the catalina based tomcat engine. So, just to avoid a bit
> > package refactor in the future, I'd like your input what you think
> > would be a good code name for the ActiveMQ 6 code base? Lets try to
> > keep it concise as it will be used in package names.
> >
> > My favorites so far would be:
> > apollo
> > puma
> >
> > --
> > Regards,
> > Hiram
> >
> > Blog: http://hiramchirino.com
> >
> > Open Source SOA
> > http://fusesource.com/
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Regards,
> Hiram
>
> Blog: http://hiramchirino.com
>
> Open Source SOA
> http://fusesource.com/
>
--
http://blog.garytully.com
Open Source Integration
http://fusesource.com
Re: ActiveMQ 6 Codename?
Posted by Hiram Chirino <hi...@hiramchirino.com>.
Any other thoughts out there?
On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 9:36 AM, Hiram Chirino <hi...@hiramchirino.com>wrote:
> Hi Guys,
>
> So while working on the ActiveMQ flow module which I hope one day will
> be come ActiveMQ 6, I realized that I'm going to need a new package
> name space to hold all the new bits to avoid clashing with the 5.x
> classes in cases where users have both products in the same classpath.
> I decided to use 'org.apache.activemq.apollo' for now.
> This is similar to what the Tomcat project when through when they
> developed the catalina based tomcat engine. So, just to avoid a bit
> package refactor in the future, I'd like your input what you think
> would be a good code name for the ActiveMQ 6 code base? Lets try to
> keep it concise as it will be used in package names.
>
> My favorites so far would be:
> apollo
> puma
>
> --
> Regards,
> Hiram
>
> Blog: http://hiramchirino.com
>
> Open Source SOA
> http://fusesource.com/
>
--
Regards,
Hiram
Blog: http://hiramchirino.com
Open Source SOA
http://fusesource.com/
Re: ActiveMQ 6 Codename?
Posted by Rob Davies <ra...@gmail.com>.
lol!
On 11 Jun 2009, at 21:48, Jim Gomes wrote:
> Sticking with the mythology theme:
>
> +1 Charon
>
> Charon was the ferryman and was the implicit flow control for entry
> into hell.
>
> - Jim
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: "Colin MacNaughton" <co...@gmail.com>
>
> Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2009 08:34:06
> To: <de...@activemq.apache.org>
> Subject: RE: ActiveMQ 6 Codename?
>
>
> +1 apollo for me.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bruce Snyder [mailto:bruce.snyder@gmail.com]
> Sent: Thursday, June 11, 2009 7:28 AM
> To: dev@activemq.apache.org
> Subject: Re: ActiveMQ 6 Codename?
>
> On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 7:42 AM, Rob Davies<ra...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>> puma gets my vote
>
> +1 for puma.
>
> Bruce
> --
> perl -e 'print
> unpack("u30","D0G)U8V4\@4VYY9&5R\"F)R=6-E+G-N>61E<D\!G;6%I;\"YC;VT*"
> );'
>
> ActiveMQ in Action: http://bit.ly/2je6cQ
> Blog: http://bruceblog.org/
> Twitter: http://twitter.com/brucesnyder
>
>
Re: ActiveMQ 6 Codename?
Posted by Jim Gomes <e....@gmail.com>.
Sticking with the mythology theme:
+1 Charon
Charon was the ferryman and was the implicit flow control for entry into hell.
- Jim
-----Original Message-----
From: "Colin MacNaughton" <co...@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2009 08:34:06
To: <de...@activemq.apache.org>
Subject: RE: ActiveMQ 6 Codename?
+1 apollo for me.
-----Original Message-----
From: Bruce Snyder [mailto:bruce.snyder@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, June 11, 2009 7:28 AM
To: dev@activemq.apache.org
Subject: Re: ActiveMQ 6 Codename?
On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 7:42 AM, Rob Davies<ra...@gmail.com> wrote:
> puma gets my vote
+1 for puma.
Bruce
--
perl -e 'print
unpack("u30","D0G)U8V4\@4VYY9&5R\"F)R=6-E+G-N>61E<D\!G;6%I;\"YC;VT*"
);'
ActiveMQ in Action: http://bit.ly/2je6cQ
Blog: http://bruceblog.org/
Twitter: http://twitter.com/brucesnyder
RE: ActiveMQ 6 Codename?
Posted by Colin MacNaughton <co...@gmail.com>.
+1 apollo for me.
-----Original Message-----
From: Bruce Snyder [mailto:bruce.snyder@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, June 11, 2009 7:28 AM
To: dev@activemq.apache.org
Subject: Re: ActiveMQ 6 Codename?
On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 7:42 AM, Rob Davies<ra...@gmail.com> wrote:
> puma gets my vote
+1 for puma.
Bruce
--
perl -e 'print
unpack("u30","D0G)U8V4\@4VYY9&5R\"F)R=6-E+G-N>61E<D\!G;6%I;\"YC;VT*"
);'
ActiveMQ in Action: http://bit.ly/2je6cQ
Blog: http://bruceblog.org/
Twitter: http://twitter.com/brucesnyder
Re: ActiveMQ 6 Codename?
Posted by Bruce Snyder <br...@gmail.com>.
On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 7:42 AM, Rob Davies<ra...@gmail.com> wrote:
> puma gets my vote
+1 for puma.
Bruce
--
perl -e 'print unpack("u30","D0G)U8V4\@4VYY9&5R\"F)R=6-E+G-N>61E<D\!G;6%I;\"YC;VT*"
);'
ActiveMQ in Action: http://bit.ly/2je6cQ
Blog: http://bruceblog.org/
Twitter: http://twitter.com/brucesnyder
Re: ActiveMQ 6 Codename?
Posted by Rob Davies <ra...@gmail.com>.
puma gets my vote
On 11 Jun 2009, at 14:36, Hiram Chirino wrote:
> Hi Guys,
>
> So while working on the ActiveMQ flow module which I hope one day will
> be come ActiveMQ 6, I realized that I'm going to need a new package
> name space to hold all the new bits to avoid clashing with the 5.x
> classes in cases where users have both products in the same classpath.
> I decided to use 'org.apache.activemq.apollo' for now.
> This is similar to what the Tomcat project when through when they
> developed the catalina based tomcat engine. So, just to avoid a bit
> package refactor in the future, I'd like your input what you think
> would be a good code name for the ActiveMQ 6 code base? Lets try to
> keep it concise as it will be used in package names.
>
> My favorites so far would be:
> apollo
> puma
>
> --
> Regards,
> Hiram
>
> Blog: http://hiramchirino.com
>
> Open Source SOA
> http://fusesource.com/