You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@jclouds.apache.org by Andrew Bayer <no...@github.com> on 2013/08/02 23:34:18 UTC
[jclouds-labs-openstack] Switch to 1.6.2-SNAPSHOT (#20)
You can merge this Pull Request by running:
git pull https://github.com/abayer/jclouds-labs-openstack os-labs-to-1.6.x
Or you can view, comment on it, or merge it online at:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs-openstack/pull/20
-- Commit Summary --
* Switch to 1.6.2-SNAPSHOT
-- File Changes --
M openstack-glance/pom.xml (4)
M openstack-quantum/pom.xml (4)
M openstack-swift/pom.xml (4)
M openstack-trove/pom.xml (4)
M pom.xml (4)
M rackspace-clouddatabases-uk/pom.xml (4)
M rackspace-clouddatabases-us/pom.xml (4)
-- Patch Links --
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs-openstack/pull/20.patch
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs-openstack/pull/20.diff
Re: [jclouds-labs-openstack] Switch to 1.6.2-SNAPSHOT (#20)
Posted by Andrew Phillips <no...@github.com>.
Looks good to me. Let's see what BuildHive and friends say.
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs-openstack/pull/20#issuecomment-22037413
Re: [jclouds-labs-openstack] Switch to 1.6.2-SNAPSHOT (#20)
Posted by BuildHive <no...@github.com>.
[jclouds ยป jclouds-labs-openstack #268](https://buildhive.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds/job/jclouds-labs-openstack/268/) SUCCESS
This pull request looks good
[(what's this?)](https://www.cloudbees.com/what-is-buildhive)
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs-openstack/pull/20#issuecomment-22037671
Re: [jclouds-labs-openstack] Switch to 1.6.2-SNAPSHOT (#20)
Posted by CloudBees pull request builder plugin <no...@github.com>.
[jclouds-labs-openstack-pull-requests #26](https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds-labs-openstack-pull-requests/26/) SUCCESS
This pull request looks good
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs-openstack/pull/20#issuecomment-22037823