You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@flink.apache.org by "Fabian Hueske (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2018/01/23 09:13:00 UTC
[jira] [Created] (FLINK-8487) State loss after multiple restart
attempts
Fabian Hueske created FLINK-8487:
------------------------------------
Summary: State loss after multiple restart attempts
Key: FLINK-8487
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-8487
Project: Flink
Issue Type: Bug
Components: State Backends, Checkpointing
Affects Versions: 1.3.2
Reporter: Fabian Hueske
Fix For: 1.5.0, 1.4.1
A user [reported this issue|https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/9dc9b719cf8449067ad01114fedb75d1beac7b4dff171acdcc24903d@%3Cuser.flink.apache.org%3E] on the user@f.a.o mailing list and analyzed the situation.
Scenario:
- A program that reads from Kafka and computes counts in a keyed 15 minute tumbling window. StateBackend is RocksDB and checkpointing is enabled.
{code}
keyBy(0)
.timeWindow(Time.of(window_size, TimeUnit.MINUTES))
.allowedLateness(Time.of(late_by, TimeUnit.SECONDS))
.reduce(new ReduceFunction(), new WindowFunction())
{code}
- At some point HDFS went into a safe mode due to NameNode issues
- The following exception was thrown
{code}
org.apache.hadoop.ipc.RemoteException(org.apache.hadoop.ipc.StandbyException): Operation category WRITE is not supported in state standby. Visit https://s.apache.org/sbnn-error
..................
at org.apache.flink.runtime.fs.hdfs.HadoopFileSystem.mkdirs(HadoopFileSystem.java:453)
at org.apache.flink.core.fs.SafetyNetWrapperFileSystem.mkdirs(SafetyNetWrapperFileSystem.java:111)
at org.apache.flink.runtime.state.filesystem.FsCheckpointStreamFactory.createBasePath(FsCheckpointStreamFactory.java:132)
{code}
- The pipeline came back after a few restarts and checkpoint failures, after the HDFS issues were resolved.
- It was evident that operator state was lost. Either it was the Kafka consumer that kept on advancing it's offset between a start and the next checkpoint failure (a minute's worth) or the the operator that had partial aggregates was lost.
The user did some in-depth analysis (see [mail thread|https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/9dc9b719cf8449067ad01114fedb75d1beac7b4dff171acdcc24903d@%3Cuser.flink.apache.org%3E]) and might have (according to [~aljoscha]) identified the problem.
[~stefanrichter83@gmail.com], can you have a look at this issue and check if it is relevant?
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)