You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@pagespeed.apache.org by Otto van der Schaaf <os...@we-amp.com> on 2017/12/28 13:30:57 UTC
Apache RAT tools report for mod_pagespeed & third party licensing audit
Hi all,
I have been able to run the RAT tools on mod_pagespeed's HEAD of master.
(excluding the third_party/ directory)
The result is here:
https://gist.github.com/oschaaf/ae0a4d7faeba75c4c9bd33bf1f274ee6
Glancing over the report, it looks to me like we're mostly good (the
majority of files is already marked as AL2).
The remaining files that are not marked as AL2 (531) look like they are
easy to address.
I also started out mapping licenses of third party dependencies, but this
is still work in progress.. tracking status at:
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1NTD2BKOEaX_8rQNKj8_6hdIbFl8UHYETfnZS2pkbvpw/edit?usp=sharing
Otto
Re: Apache RAT tools report for mod_pagespeed & third party licensing audit
Posted by Otto van der Schaaf <os...@we-amp.com>.
https://github.com/pagespeed/mod_pagespeed-debian-packaging/blob/master/debian/copyright
looks
very useful indeed,
thanks Maks!
Otto
On Thu, Dec 28, 2017 at 3:22 PM Maksim Orlovich
<mo...@google.com.invalid> wrote:
> The COPYRIGHT file in the Debian package may be of some use here, though it
> wouldn't include the 3rd part stuff that picks up from packages.
>
>
> On Thu, Dec 28, 2017 at 8:30 AM, Otto van der Schaaf <os...@we-amp.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I have been able to run the RAT tools on mod_pagespeed's HEAD of master.
> > (excluding the third_party/ directory)
> >
> > The result is here:
> > https://gist.github.com/oschaaf/ae0a4d7faeba75c4c9bd33bf1f274ee6
> > Glancing over the report, it looks to me like we're mostly good (the
> > majority of files is already marked as AL2).
> > The remaining files that are not marked as AL2 (531) look like they are
> > easy to address.
> >
> > I also started out mapping licenses of third party dependencies, but this
> > is still work in progress.. tracking status at:
> > https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1NTD2BKOEaX_8rQNKj8_
> > 6hdIbFl8UHYETfnZS2pkbvpw/edit?usp=sharing
> >
> > Otto
> >
>
Re: Apache RAT tools report for mod_pagespeed & third party licensing audit
Posted by Maksim Orlovich <mo...@google.com.INVALID>.
The COPYRIGHT file in the Debian package may be of some use here, though it
wouldn't include the 3rd part stuff that picks up from packages.
On Thu, Dec 28, 2017 at 8:30 AM, Otto van der Schaaf <os...@we-amp.com>
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I have been able to run the RAT tools on mod_pagespeed's HEAD of master.
> (excluding the third_party/ directory)
>
> The result is here:
> https://gist.github.com/oschaaf/ae0a4d7faeba75c4c9bd33bf1f274ee6
> Glancing over the report, it looks to me like we're mostly good (the
> majority of files is already marked as AL2).
> The remaining files that are not marked as AL2 (531) look like they are
> easy to address.
>
> I also started out mapping licenses of third party dependencies, but this
> is still work in progress.. tracking status at:
> https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1NTD2BKOEaX_8rQNKj8_
> 6hdIbFl8UHYETfnZS2pkbvpw/edit?usp=sharing
>
> Otto
>