Re: REsizing batik to a minimum for us.

[Juan Jose Pablos <ch...@che-che.com>]

Carlos Araya escribió:
> Juan Jose:
> 
> Breaking a tool that has been in use is not a significant change? I
> think it is because people  know to expect this and then suddenly we
> tell them: no it's no longer available, deal with it, and don't
> provide an alternative
> 
> One user has already replied that this is a functionality that they
> need.
> 
> I don't think eliminating functionality is the way to clean up the
> jar mess you refer to
> 
> Carlosc

no one suggested to remove the funcionality, just only to remove the 
jars that are not used by Forrest.