[jira] [Comment Edited] (SOLR-7672) introduce implicit _parent_:true

["Mikhail Khludnev (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>]

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-7672?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15038213#comment-15038213 ] 

Mikhail Khludnev edited comment on SOLR-7672 at 12/4/15 7:32 AM:
-----------------------------------------------------------------

[~yseeley@gmail.com]
my turn: {{\_type_:_root_}} and spin off a jira about  {{\_type_:\_root_.home_address}} or  {{\_type_:home_address}} 
Do you like it?


was (Author: mkhludnev):
[~yseeley@gmail.com]
my turn: {{_type_:_root_}} and spin off a jira about  {{_type_:_root_.home_address}} or  {{_type_:home_address}} 
Do you like it?

> introduce implicit _parent_:true  
> ----------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SOLR-7672
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-7672
>             Project: Solr
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: query parsers, update
>    Affects Versions: 5.2
>            Reporter: Mikhail Khludnev
>            Assignee: Mikhail Khludnev
>             Fix For: 5.4, Trunk
>
>
> Solr provides block join support in non-invasive manner. It turns out, it gives a chance to shoot a leg. As it was advised by [~thetaphi] at SOLR-7606, let AddUpdateCommand add _parent_:true field to the document (not to children). Do it *always* no matter whether it has children or not.    
> Also, introduce default values for for block join qparsers \{!parent *which=\_parent\_:true*} \{!child *of=\_parent\_:true*} (sometimes, I rather want to hide them from the user, because they are misunderstood quite often).  
> Please share your concerns and vote.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org