You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@etch.apache.org by scott comer <sc...@cisco.com> on 2009/01/20 16:45:05 UTC
[vote] etch logo
ok, so last week we had discussion, the sense it got was that these
logos were enough for a vote. david staudt suggested a combination of
(2) and (3) which i don't entirely understand (please explain david!).
let's call that (4) an have it as a virtual icon. please vote now for
(1) through (4). you've got 48 hours. only committers have a vote,
others may express their opinion. committers are scott, jd, seth, james,
rene, guarav, jim, youngjin.
thanks,
scott out
Re: [vote] etch logo
Posted by scott comer <sc...@cisco.com>.
ok we got 3 votes for #3, and 2 votes for #2. we've not heard from james
or youngjin. what's up with that?
scott out
scott comer wrote:
> ok, so last week we had discussion, the sense it got was that these
> logos were enough for a vote. david staudt suggested a combination of
> (2) and (3) which i don't entirely understand (please explain david!).
> let's call that (4) an have it as a virtual icon. please vote now for
> (1) through (4). you've got 48 hours. only committers have a vote,
> others may express their opinion. committers are scott, jd, seth,
> james, rene, guarav, jim, youngjin.
>
> thanks,
> scott out
>
>
>
>
>
Re: [vote] etch logo
Posted by "scott comer (sccomer)" <sc...@cisco.com>.
thanks!
Niclas Hedhman wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 5:38 PM, scott comer (sccomer)
> <sc...@cisco.com> wrote:
>
>> ok, everyone has voted. that's a first.
>>
>> 5 for #3 (rene, jd, gaurav, james, youngjin)
>> 2 for #2 (scott, jim).
>>
>> #3 it is. i'm going to attach the image below to the issue.
>>
>> james will then hack the image up to extract the logo and put it where it
>> goes on the wiki.
>>
>> many thanks to thien for the effort to make the logos.
>> (oh, i attached it granting rights to asf, is that ok, thien?)
>>
>
> Thien has probably gone off for Chinese New Year celebrations next week already.
>
> Thien have a ICLA on file with the ASF Secretary, and material he
> contributes fall under Apache Licensing rules, like source files.
>
> Will also ask him to submit the Illustrator source files, and SVG
> variants, for your safe keeping.
>
>
> Cheers
> Niclas
>
Re: [vote] etch logo
Posted by Niclas Hedhman <ni...@hedhman.org>.
On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 5:38 PM, scott comer (sccomer)
<sc...@cisco.com> wrote:
> ok, everyone has voted. that's a first.
>
> 5 for #3 (rene, jd, gaurav, james, youngjin)
> 2 for #2 (scott, jim).
>
> #3 it is. i'm going to attach the image below to the issue.
>
> james will then hack the image up to extract the logo and put it where it
> goes on the wiki.
>
> many thanks to thien for the effort to make the logos.
> (oh, i attached it granting rights to asf, is that ok, thien?)
Thien has probably gone off for Chinese New Year celebrations next week already.
Thien have a ICLA on file with the ASF Secretary, and material he
contributes fall under Apache Licensing rules, like source files.
Will also ask him to submit the Illustrator source files, and SVG
variants, for your safe keeping.
Cheers
Niclas
--
http://www.qi4j.org - New Energy for Java
Re: [vote] etch logo
Posted by Thien <th...@gmail.com>.
Thanks.
I'm ok with granting rights to asf (can't open the attachment though, but
it's ok).
Thien
On Sat, Jan 24, 2009 at 12:38 AM, scott comer (sccomer)
<sc...@cisco.com>wrote:
> ok, everyone has voted. that's a first.
>
> 5 for #3 (rene, jd, gaurav, james, youngjin)
> 2 for #2 (scott, jim).
>
> #3 it is. i'm going to attach the image below to the issue.
>
> james will then hack the image up to extract the logo and put it where it
> goes on the wiki.
>
> many thanks to thien for the effort to make the logos.
> (oh, i attached it granting rights to asf, is that ok, thien?)
>
> many thanks,
> scott out
>
> scott comer wrote:
>
> ok, so last week we had discussion, the sense it got was that these logos
> were enough for a vote. david staudt suggested a combination of (2) and (3)
> which i don't entirely understand (please explain david!). let's call that
> (4) an have it as a virtual icon. please vote now for (1) through (4).
> you've got 48 hours. only committers have a vote, others may express their
> opinion. committers are scott, jd, seth, james, rene, guarav, jim, youngjin.
>
> thanks,
> scott out
>
>
>
>
>
>
Re: [vote] etch logo
Posted by "scott comer (sccomer)" <sc...@cisco.com>.
ok, everyone has voted. that's a first.
5 for #3 (rene, jd, gaurav, james, youngjin)
2 for #2 (scott, jim).
#3 it is. i'm going to attach the image below to the issue.
james will then hack the image up to extract the logo and put it where
it goes on the wiki.
many thanks to thien for the effort to make the logos.
(oh, i attached it granting rights to asf, is that ok, thien?)
many thanks,
scott out
scott comer wrote:
> ok, so last week we had discussion, the sense it got was that these
> logos were enough for a vote. david staudt suggested a combination of
> (2) and (3) which i don't entirely understand (please explain david!).
> let's call that (4) an have it as a virtual icon. please vote now for
> (1) through (4). you've got 48 hours. only committers have a vote,
> others may express their opinion. committers are scott, jd, seth,
> james, rene, guarav, jim, youngjin.
>
> thanks,
> scott out
>
>
>
>
>
RE: [vote] etch logo
Posted by "Youngjin Park (youngjpa)" <yo...@cisco.com>.
+1 on the logo #3
Youngjin
Re: [vote] etch logo
Posted by James Dixson <di...@gmail.com>.
+1 on logo #3
On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 9:45 AM, scott comer <sc...@cisco.com> wrote:
> ok, so last week we had discussion, the sense it got was that these logos
> were enough for a vote. david staudt suggested a combination of (2) and (3)
> which i don't entirely understand (please explain david!). let's call that
> (4) an have it as a virtual icon. please vote now for (1) through (4).
> you've got 48 hours. only committers have a vote, others may express their
> opinion. committers are scott, jd, seth, james, rene, guarav, jim, youngjin.
>
> thanks,
> scott out
>
>
>
>
>
>
Re: [vote] etch logo
Posted by scott comer <sc...@cisco.com>.
thanks for that clarification, david!
scott out
David Staudt (dstaudt) wrote:
> My suggestion was basically #2 with a smoother, more regular font -
> the current #2 font has wavy edges and looks hand-lettered.
>
> Otherwise backing #2
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> *From:* Scott Comer (sccomer)
> *Sent:* Tuesday, January 20, 2009 9:45 AM
> *To:* etch-dev@incubator.apache.org
> *Subject:* [vote] etch logo
>
> ok, so last week we had discussion, the sense it got was that these
> logos were enough for a vote. david staudt suggested a combination of
> (2) and (3) which i don't entirely understand (please explain david!).
> let's call that (4) an have it as a virtual icon. please vote now for
> (1) through (4). you've got 48 hours. only committers have a vote,
> others may express their opinion. committers are scott, jd, seth,
> james, rene, guarav, jim, youngjin.
>
> thanks,
> scott out
>
>
>
>
>
RE: [vote] etch logo
Posted by "David Staudt (dstaudt)" <ds...@cisco.com>.
My suggestion was basically #2 with a smoother, more regular font - the
current #2 font has wavy edges and looks hand-lettered.
Otherwise backing #2
________________________________
From: Scott Comer (sccomer)
Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2009 9:45 AM
To: etch-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: [vote] etch logo
ok, so last week we had discussion, the sense it got was that these
logos were enough for a vote. david staudt suggested a combination of
(2) and (3) which i don't entirely understand (please explain david!).
let's call that (4) an have it as a virtual icon. please vote now for
(1) through (4). you've got 48 hours. only committers have a vote,
others may express their opinion. committers are scott, jd, seth, james,
rene, guarav, jim, youngjin.
thanks,
scott out
RE: [vote] etch logo
Posted by "James DeCocq (jadecocq)" <ja...@cisco.com>.
#2
________________________________
From: Scott Comer (sccomer)
Sent: Thursday, January 22, 2009 9:15 AM
To: etch-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [vote] etch logo
logo 2: +1
scott comer wrote:
ok, so last week we had discussion, the sense it got was that
these logos were enough for a vote. david staudt suggested a combination
of (2) and (3) which i don't entirely understand (please explain
david!). let's call that (4) an have it as a virtual icon. please vote
now for (1) through (4). you've got 48 hours. only committers have a
vote, others may express their opinion. committers are scott, jd, seth,
james, rene, guarav, jim, youngjin.
thanks,
scott out
RE: [vote] etch logo
Posted by "J.D. Liau (jliau)" <jl...@cisco.com>.
logo 3: +1
________________________________
From: Scott Comer (sccomer)
Sent: Thursday, January 22, 2009 9:15 AM
To: etch-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [vote] etch logo
logo 2: +1
scott comer wrote:
ok, so last week we had discussion, the sense it got was that
these logos were enough for a vote. david staudt suggested a combination
of (2) and (3) which i don't entirely understand (please explain
david!). let's call that (4) an have it as a virtual icon. please vote
now for (1) through (4). you've got 48 hours. only committers have a
vote, others may express their opinion. committers are scott, jd, seth,
james, rene, guarav, jim, youngjin.
thanks,
scott out
RE: [vote] etch logo
Posted by "Gaurav Sandhir (gsandhir)" <gs...@cisco.com>.
logo 3: +1
-Gaurav
________________________________
From: Scott Comer (sccomer)
Sent: Thursday, January 22, 2009 9:15 AM
To: etch-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [vote] etch logo
logo 2: +1
scott comer wrote:
ok, so last week we had discussion, the sense it got was that
these logos were enough for a vote. david staudt suggested a combination
of (2) and (3) which i don't entirely understand (please explain
david!). let's call that (4) an have it as a virtual icon. please vote
now for (1) through (4). you've got 48 hours. only committers have a
vote, others may express their opinion. committers are scott, jd, seth,
james, rene, guarav, jim, youngjin.
thanks,
scott out
Re: [vote] etch logo
Posted by scott comer <sc...@cisco.com>.
logo 2: +1
scott comer wrote:
> ok, so last week we had discussion, the sense it got was that these
> logos were enough for a vote. david staudt suggested a combination of
> (2) and (3) which i don't entirely understand (please explain david!).
> let's call that (4) an have it as a virtual icon. please vote now for
> (1) through (4). you've got 48 hours. only committers have a vote,
> others may express their opinion. committers are scott, jd, seth,
> james, rene, guarav, jim, youngjin.
>
> thanks,
> scott out
>
>
>
>
>
Re: [vote] etch logo
Posted by René Barraza <re...@cisco.com>.
+1 for #3
Regards,
René
On 1/20/09 9:45 AM, "scott comer" <sc...@cisco.com> wrote:
> ok, so last week we had discussion, the sense it got was that these logos were
> enough for a vote. david staudt suggested a combination of (2) and (3) which i
> don't entirely understand (please explain david!). let's call that (4) an have
> it as a virtual icon. please vote now for (1) through (4). you've got 48
> hours. only committers have a vote, others may express their opinion.
> committers are scott, jd, seth, james, rene, guarav, jim, youngjin.
>
> thanks,
> scott out
>
>
>
>
>
>