You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to general@incubator.apache.org by Konstantin Boudnik <co...@apache.org> on 2014/09/04 07:11:04 UTC
Re: Mentors heartbeat
Arguably, the number of mentored project doesn't reflect "the activity" per
se. Unless I am missing something.
Cos
On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 04:46AM, Mattmann, Chris A (3980) wrote:
> Guys, +1 to eventually doing this with JSON and YAML. The big problem
> I see is curation (someone has to maintain it). Right now board reports
> and the wiki are what's used to make the report, so feel free to use my
> scripts for now until those are changed over. For example, I just ran them
> right now (with some major pythonic updates to sniff mentors, and to
> map name to committer ID, and updating years and months to current and
> here's what I get):
>
> 29 phunt
> 24 tomwhite
> 24 rvs
> 24 mattmann
> 23 cdouglas
> 20 hsaputra
> 18 bdelacretaz
> 18 arvind
> 16 adc
> 14 smarru
> 14 rgardler
> 14 olamy
> 14 gates
> 13 jfarrell
> 12 kevan
> 11 tdunning
> 11 jim
> 11 grobmeier
> 11 ddas
> 10 omalley
> 9 mfranklin
> 8 wave
> 8 lresende
> 8 jbonofre
> 8 ate
> 7 twilliams
> 7 rfrovarp
> 7 ke4qqq
> 7 jukka
> 6 jzb
> 6 acmurthy
> 5 struberg
> 5 nslater
> 5 marrs
> 5 lewismc
> 5 greddin
> 5 bodewig
> 4 thorsten
> 4 mahadev
> 4 joes
> 4 jghoman
> 4 gsingers
> 4 fmui
> 3 upayavira
> 3 tommaso
> 3 stevenn
> 3 ssc
> 3 snoopdave
> 3 nick
> 3 marvin
> 3 hwright
> 3 gstein
> 3 gianugo
> 3 chipchilders
> 3 benh
> 3 apurtell
> 2 todd
> 2 larsh
> 2 jochen
> 2 jmclean
> 2 dkulp
> 2 dennisl
> 2 dashorst
> 2 cutting
> 2 antelder
> 1 yegor
> 1 wrowe
> 1 wavw
> 1 stack
> 1 simonetripodi
> 1 robweir
> 1 rmannibucau
> 1 rfeng
> 1 rbircher
> 1 nandana
> 1 mnour
> 1 jvermillard
> 1 fchrist
> 1 enis
> 1 elecharny
> 1 cos
> 1 coheigea
> 1 brett
> 1 bmargulies
> 1 berndf
> 1 asavory
> 1 ant
> 1 akarasulu
> 1 ahart
>
>
>
>
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> Chris Mattmann, Ph.D.
> Chief Architect
> Instrument Software and Science Data Systems Section (398)
> NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA
> Office: 168-519, Mailstop: 168-527
> Email: chris.a.mattmann@nasa.gov
> WWW: http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> Adjunct Associate Professor, Computer Science Department
> University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>
>
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: "Alan D. Cabrera" <li...@toolazydogs.com>
> Reply-To: "general@incubator.apache.org" <ge...@incubator.apache.org>
> Date: Sunday, August 24, 2014 10:54 AM
> To: "general@incubator.apache.org" <ge...@incubator.apache.org>
> Subject: Re: Mentors heartbeat
>
> >
> >On Aug 24, 2014, at 10:51 AM, Alan D. Cabrera <li...@toolazydogs.com>
> >wrote:
> >
> >>>> I am not so sure if its worth while with the board report.
> >>
> >> What's good for the goose is good for the gander. Having the board
> >>report in machine readable formats provides the same advantages as that
> >>afforded incubator reports.
> >
> >If these machine readable reports work out, I see no reason why they
> >would not, then I predict an explosion of tool driven processes, e.g.
> >release voting, podling acceptance and graduation votes, etc.
> >
> >
> >Regards,
> >Alan
> >
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>
Re: Mentors heartbeat
Posted by "Mattmann, Chris A (3980)" <ch...@jpl.nasa.gov>.
Sure Tim I can do that one sec I'll make it an option
Sent from my iPhone
> On Sep 4, 2014, at 7:48 AM, "Tim Williams" <wi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 10:31 AM, Chris Mattmann <ma...@apache.org> wrote:
>> Seriously, give me a break.
>>
>> This has been discussed ad naseum - It's a quick simple measure
>> to see if one of the stated requirements for mentors (reading the
>> monthly report, and *signing that you read it*) has been fulfilled.
>
> The initial query was about finding MIA mentors - I reckon changing
> the mentor_tick_pattern to look for unsigned reports would help with
> that?
>
> --tim
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
Re: Mentors heartbeat
Posted by Tim Williams <wi...@gmail.com>.
On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 10:31 AM, Chris Mattmann <ma...@apache.org> wrote:
> Seriously, give me a break.
>
> This has been discussed ad naseum - It's a quick simple measure
> to see if one of the stated requirements for mentors (reading the
> monthly report, and *signing that you read it*) has been fulfilled.
The initial query was about finding MIA mentors - I reckon changing
the mentor_tick_pattern to look for unsigned reports would help with
that?
--tim
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
Re: Mentors heartbeat
Posted by Ross Gardler <rg...@opendirective.com>.
I said *this* measure was bad, yes. I also explicitly said that I limit my
comments to *this* specific example tooling - I don't see value in counting
"ticks" on a piece of virtual paper over a period of three years. I care
about who is doing a great job today.
Tim suggests a good way to stop this being metric based and more tool based
(i.e. finding mentors who are MIA and thus finding projects that don't have
sufficient coverage). That being said, since the IPMC review the reports
I'm not sure why this is even needed. But I don't see harm in doing it this
way so I'll leave it right there.
Ross
On 4 September 2014 07:31, Chris Mattmann <ma...@apache.org> wrote:
> Seriously, give me a break.
>
> This has been discussed ad naseum - It's a quick simple measure
> to see if one of the stated requirements for mentors (reading the
> monthly report, and *signing that you read it*) has been fulfilled.
> It means nothing more than that. I didn't say good. I didn't say bad.
> You did.
>
> Statistics are simply that - statistics. Meaning is derived from them
> in multiple ways. You showing up on this list simply means at one point
> over the past 3-4 years, you thought that putting your name on one of
> those wiki pages was important enough to do so, 14 times.
>
> Anyone that would like to let their coding/scripting do the talking,
> I invite you to.
>
> Until then, feel free to send more email messages debating this message
> and the follow on reply that I won't be sending, and any further messages
> to yourself and others after that.
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: "rgardler@opendirective.com" <rg...@opendirective.com>
> Reply-To: "general@incubator.apache.org" <ge...@incubator.apache.org>
> Date: Thursday, September 4, 2014 12:05 AM
> To: "general@incubator.apache.org" <ge...@incubator.apache.org>
> Subject: RE: Mentors heartbeat
>
> >Surely we are not going to start counting signing off on a report as
> >indicative of good/bad mentoring?
> >
> >What's important is whether podlings are getting what they need from
> >their mentors. Besides, someone who has actively mentored one new
> >podling through initial setup in a first month will have one "tick" while
> >someone else who has done little more than sign off on reports for the
> >years will have many "ticks".
> >
> >Case in point, I've not actively mentored a project for at least a couple
> >of years (I just signed up to one this month), yet according to this
> >measure I am one of the more active mentors.
> >
> >Lets not demean the work good new mentors are doing by counting a few
> >characters on a wiki page.
> >
> >Note, I'm not saying rolling to assist the incubator and mentors is a bad
> >thing. I'm saying this specific example is a bad thing.
> >
> >Sent from my Windows Phone
> >
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: "Mattmann, Chris A (3980)" <ch...@jpl.nasa.gov>
> >Sent: ?9/?3/?2014 10:25 PM
> >To: "general@incubator.apache.org" <ge...@incubator.apache.org>
> >Subject: Re: Mentors heartbeat
> >
> >These are the "signed off" per month mentors per podling over
> >the last 3 years. So it measures how many times a mentor has
> >signed off (summed across all podlings) during that time span.
> >
> >Cheers,
> >Chris
> >
> >
> >++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >Chris Mattmann, Ph.D.
> >Chief Architect
> >Instrument Software and Science Data Systems Section (398)
> >NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA
> >Office: 168-519, Mailstop: 168-527
> >Email: chris.a.mattmann@nasa.gov
> >WWW: http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/
> >++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >Adjunct Associate Professor, Computer Science Department
> >University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA
> >++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: Konstantin Boudnik <co...@apache.org>
> >Reply-To: <ge...@incubator.apache.org>
> >Date: Wednesday, September 3, 2014 10:11 PM
> >To: <ge...@incubator.apache.org>
> >Subject: Re: Mentors heartbeat
> >
> >>Arguably, the number of mentored project doesn't reflect "the activity"
> >>per
> >>se. Unless I am missing something.
> >>
> >>Cos
> >>
> >>On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 04:46AM, Mattmann, Chris A (3980) wrote:
> >>> Guys, +1 to eventually doing this with JSON and YAML. The big problem
> >>> I see is curation (someone has to maintain it). Right now board reports
> >>> and the wiki are what's used to make the report, so feel free to use my
> >>> scripts for now until those are changed over. For example, I just ran
> >>>them
> >>> right now (with some major pythonic updates to sniff mentors, and to
> >>> map name to committer ID, and updating years and months to current and
> >>> here's what I get):
> >>>
> >>> 29 phunt
> >>> 24 tomwhite
> >>> 24 rvs
> >>> 24 mattmann
> >>> 23 cdouglas
> >>> 20 hsaputra
> >>> 18 bdelacretaz
> >>> 18 arvind
> >>> 16 adc
> >>> 14 smarru
> >>> 14 rgardler
> >>> 14 olamy
> >>> 14 gates
> >>> 13 jfarrell
> >>> 12 kevan
> >>> 11 tdunning
> >>> 11 jim
> >>> 11 grobmeier
> >>> 11 ddas
> >>> 10 omalley
> >>> 9 mfranklin
> >>> 8 wave
> >>> 8 lresende
> >>> 8 jbonofre
> >>> 8 ate
> >>> 7 twilliams
> >>> 7 rfrovarp
> >>> 7 ke4qqq
> >>> 7 jukka
> >>> 6 jzb
> >>> 6 acmurthy
> >>> 5 struberg
> >>> 5 nslater
> >>> 5 marrs
> >>> 5 lewismc
> >>> 5 greddin
> >>> 5 bodewig
> >>> 4 thorsten
> >>> 4 mahadev
> >>> 4 joes
> >>> 4 jghoman
> >>> 4 gsingers
> >>> 4 fmui
> >>> 3 upayavira
> >>> 3 tommaso
> >>> 3 stevenn
> >>> 3 ssc
> >>> 3 snoopdave
> >>> 3 nick
> >>> 3 marvin
> >>> 3 hwright
> >>> 3 gstein
> >>> 3 gianugo
> >>> 3 chipchilders
> >>> 3 benh
> >>> 3 apurtell
> >>> 2 todd
> >>> 2 larsh
> >>> 2 jochen
> >>> 2 jmclean
> >>> 2 dkulp
> >>> 2 dennisl
> >>> 2 dashorst
> >>> 2 cutting
> >>> 2 antelder
> >>> 1 yegor
> >>> 1 wrowe
> >>> 1 wavw
> >>> 1 stack
> >>> 1 simonetripodi
> >>> 1 robweir
> >>> 1 rmannibucau
> >>> 1 rfeng
> >>> 1 rbircher
> >>> 1 nandana
> >>> 1 mnour
> >>> 1 jvermillard
> >>> 1 fchrist
> >>> 1 enis
> >>> 1 elecharny
> >>> 1 cos
> >>> 1 coheigea
> >>> 1 brett
> >>> 1 bmargulies
> >>> 1 berndf
> >>> 1 asavory
> >>> 1 ant
> >>> 1 akarasulu
> >>> 1 ahart
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >>> Chris Mattmann, Ph.D.
> >>> Chief Architect
> >>> Instrument Software and Science Data Systems Section (398)
> >>> NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA
> >>> Office: 168-519, Mailstop: 168-527
> >>> Email: chris.a.mattmann@nasa.gov
> >>> WWW: http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/
> >>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >>> Adjunct Associate Professor, Computer Science Department
> >>> University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA
> >>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> -----Original Message-----
> >>> From: "Alan D. Cabrera" <li...@toolazydogs.com>
> >>> Reply-To: "general@incubator.apache.org" <general@incubator.apache.org
> >
> >>> Date: Sunday, August 24, 2014 10:54 AM
> >>> To: "general@incubator.apache.org" <ge...@incubator.apache.org>
> >>> Subject: Re: Mentors heartbeat
> >>>
> >>> >
> >>> >On Aug 24, 2014, at 10:51 AM, Alan D. Cabrera <li...@toolazydogs.com>
> >>> >wrote:
> >>> >
> >>> >>>> I am not so sure if its worth while with the board report.
> >>> >>
> >>> >> What's good for the goose is good for the gander. Having the board
> >>> >>report in machine readable formats provides the same advantages as
> >>>that
> >>> >>afforded incubator reports.
> >>> >
> >>> >If these machine readable reports work out, I see no reason why they
> >>> >would not, then I predict an explosion of tool driven processes, e.g.
> >>> >release voting, podling acceptance and graduation votes, etc.
> >>> >
> >>> >
> >>> >Regards,
> >>> >Alan
> >>> >
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> >>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
> >>>
> >
> >
> >---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> >For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
> >
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>
>
Re: Mentors heartbeat
Posted by Chris Mattmann <ma...@apache.org>.
Seriously, give me a break.
This has been discussed ad naseum - It's a quick simple measure
to see if one of the stated requirements for mentors (reading the
monthly report, and *signing that you read it*) has been fulfilled.
It means nothing more than that. I didn't say good. I didn't say bad.
You did.
Statistics are simply that - statistics. Meaning is derived from them
in multiple ways. You showing up on this list simply means at one point
over the past 3-4 years, you thought that putting your name on one of
those wiki pages was important enough to do so, 14 times.
Anyone that would like to let their coding/scripting do the talking,
I invite you to.
Until then, feel free to send more email messages debating this message
and the follow on reply that I won't be sending, and any further messages
to yourself and others after that.
-----Original Message-----
From: "rgardler@opendirective.com" <rg...@opendirective.com>
Reply-To: "general@incubator.apache.org" <ge...@incubator.apache.org>
Date: Thursday, September 4, 2014 12:05 AM
To: "general@incubator.apache.org" <ge...@incubator.apache.org>
Subject: RE: Mentors heartbeat
>Surely we are not going to start counting signing off on a report as
>indicative of good/bad mentoring?
>
>What's important is whether podlings are getting what they need from
>their mentors. Besides, someone who has actively mentored one new
>podling through initial setup in a first month will have one "tick" while
>someone else who has done little more than sign off on reports for the
>years will have many "ticks".
>
>Case in point, I've not actively mentored a project for at least a couple
>of years (I just signed up to one this month), yet according to this
>measure I am one of the more active mentors.
>
>Lets not demean the work good new mentors are doing by counting a few
>characters on a wiki page.
>
>Note, I'm not saying rolling to assist the incubator and mentors is a bad
>thing. I'm saying this specific example is a bad thing.
>
>Sent from my Windows Phone
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: "Mattmann, Chris A (3980)" <ch...@jpl.nasa.gov>
>Sent: ?9/?3/?2014 10:25 PM
>To: "general@incubator.apache.org" <ge...@incubator.apache.org>
>Subject: Re: Mentors heartbeat
>
>These are the "signed off" per month mentors per podling over
>the last 3 years. So it measures how many times a mentor has
>signed off (summed across all podlings) during that time span.
>
>Cheers,
>Chris
>
>
>++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>Chris Mattmann, Ph.D.
>Chief Architect
>Instrument Software and Science Data Systems Section (398)
>NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA
>Office: 168-519, Mailstop: 168-527
>Email: chris.a.mattmann@nasa.gov
>WWW: http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/
>++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>Adjunct Associate Professor, Computer Science Department
>University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA
>++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>
>
>
>
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Konstantin Boudnik <co...@apache.org>
>Reply-To: <ge...@incubator.apache.org>
>Date: Wednesday, September 3, 2014 10:11 PM
>To: <ge...@incubator.apache.org>
>Subject: Re: Mentors heartbeat
>
>>Arguably, the number of mentored project doesn't reflect "the activity"
>>per
>>se. Unless I am missing something.
>>
>>Cos
>>
>>On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 04:46AM, Mattmann, Chris A (3980) wrote:
>>> Guys, +1 to eventually doing this with JSON and YAML. The big problem
>>> I see is curation (someone has to maintain it). Right now board reports
>>> and the wiki are what's used to make the report, so feel free to use my
>>> scripts for now until those are changed over. For example, I just ran
>>>them
>>> right now (with some major pythonic updates to sniff mentors, and to
>>> map name to committer ID, and updating years and months to current and
>>> here's what I get):
>>>
>>> 29 phunt
>>> 24 tomwhite
>>> 24 rvs
>>> 24 mattmann
>>> 23 cdouglas
>>> 20 hsaputra
>>> 18 bdelacretaz
>>> 18 arvind
>>> 16 adc
>>> 14 smarru
>>> 14 rgardler
>>> 14 olamy
>>> 14 gates
>>> 13 jfarrell
>>> 12 kevan
>>> 11 tdunning
>>> 11 jim
>>> 11 grobmeier
>>> 11 ddas
>>> 10 omalley
>>> 9 mfranklin
>>> 8 wave
>>> 8 lresende
>>> 8 jbonofre
>>> 8 ate
>>> 7 twilliams
>>> 7 rfrovarp
>>> 7 ke4qqq
>>> 7 jukka
>>> 6 jzb
>>> 6 acmurthy
>>> 5 struberg
>>> 5 nslater
>>> 5 marrs
>>> 5 lewismc
>>> 5 greddin
>>> 5 bodewig
>>> 4 thorsten
>>> 4 mahadev
>>> 4 joes
>>> 4 jghoman
>>> 4 gsingers
>>> 4 fmui
>>> 3 upayavira
>>> 3 tommaso
>>> 3 stevenn
>>> 3 ssc
>>> 3 snoopdave
>>> 3 nick
>>> 3 marvin
>>> 3 hwright
>>> 3 gstein
>>> 3 gianugo
>>> 3 chipchilders
>>> 3 benh
>>> 3 apurtell
>>> 2 todd
>>> 2 larsh
>>> 2 jochen
>>> 2 jmclean
>>> 2 dkulp
>>> 2 dennisl
>>> 2 dashorst
>>> 2 cutting
>>> 2 antelder
>>> 1 yegor
>>> 1 wrowe
>>> 1 wavw
>>> 1 stack
>>> 1 simonetripodi
>>> 1 robweir
>>> 1 rmannibucau
>>> 1 rfeng
>>> 1 rbircher
>>> 1 nandana
>>> 1 mnour
>>> 1 jvermillard
>>> 1 fchrist
>>> 1 enis
>>> 1 elecharny
>>> 1 cos
>>> 1 coheigea
>>> 1 brett
>>> 1 bmargulies
>>> 1 berndf
>>> 1 asavory
>>> 1 ant
>>> 1 akarasulu
>>> 1 ahart
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>> Chris Mattmann, Ph.D.
>>> Chief Architect
>>> Instrument Software and Science Data Systems Section (398)
>>> NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA
>>> Office: 168-519, Mailstop: 168-527
>>> Email: chris.a.mattmann@nasa.gov
>>> WWW: http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/
>>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>> Adjunct Associate Professor, Computer Science Department
>>> University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA
>>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: "Alan D. Cabrera" <li...@toolazydogs.com>
>>> Reply-To: "general@incubator.apache.org" <ge...@incubator.apache.org>
>>> Date: Sunday, August 24, 2014 10:54 AM
>>> To: "general@incubator.apache.org" <ge...@incubator.apache.org>
>>> Subject: Re: Mentors heartbeat
>>>
>>> >
>>> >On Aug 24, 2014, at 10:51 AM, Alan D. Cabrera <li...@toolazydogs.com>
>>> >wrote:
>>> >
>>> >>>> I am not so sure if its worth while with the board report.
>>> >>
>>> >> What's good for the goose is good for the gander. Having the board
>>> >>report in machine readable formats provides the same advantages as
>>>that
>>> >>afforded incubator reports.
>>> >
>>> >If these machine readable reports work out, I see no reason why they
>>> >would not, then I predict an explosion of tool driven processes, e.g.
>>> >release voting, podling acceptance and graduation votes, etc.
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >Regards,
>>> >Alan
>>> >
>>>
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>>>
>
>
>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
>For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
Re: Mentors heartbeat
Posted by Roman Shaposhnik <rv...@apache.org>.
On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 12:05 AM, <rg...@opendirective.com> wrote:
> Surely we are not going to start counting signing off on a report as indicative of good/bad mentoring?
Not. But what I'm going to start with is this: reflect
on the Incubator Wiki is the statistics on poddlings
who receive NO mentor sign-off at all.
IOW, if at least one mentor sings -- that's fine.
If none do -- we will start tracking it and will
get to the bottom of it if needed.
Basically, this is only meant to help podlings
who consistently don't get any attention from
*any* of their mentors. Not even from a single
one of them.
We owe it to our podlings. Plain and simple.
This is my job to do everything I can to empower them.
And yes that includes calling out bad mentorship
practices.
Now, as Chris M. pointed out -- his tools provide
a nice complimentary statistics that you're free
to use (or ignore). I, personally, will use them.
But only as a tool to help me better understand
past behavior, not as a hard policy for making
decisions.
Hope this makes things clear
Thanks,
Roman (wearing his VP of Incubator hat)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
RE: Mentors heartbeat
Posted by rg...@opendirective.com.
Surely we are not going to start counting signing off on a report as indicative of good/bad mentoring?
What's important is whether podlings are getting what they need from their mentors. Besides, someone who has actively mentored one new podling through initial setup in a first month will have one "tick" while someone else who has done little more than sign off on reports for the years will have many "ticks".
Case in point, I've not actively mentored a project for at least a couple of years (I just signed up to one this month), yet according to this measure I am one of the more active mentors.
Lets not demean the work good new mentors are doing by counting a few characters on a wiki page.
Note, I'm not saying rolling to assist the incubator and mentors is a bad thing. I'm saying this specific example is a bad thing.
Sent from my Windows Phone
-----Original Message-----
From: "Mattmann, Chris A (3980)" <ch...@jpl.nasa.gov>
Sent: 9/3/2014 10:25 PM
To: "general@incubator.apache.org" <ge...@incubator.apache.org>
Subject: Re: Mentors heartbeat
These are the "signed off" per month mentors per podling over
the last 3 years. So it measures how many times a mentor has
signed off (summed across all podlings) during that time span.
Cheers,
Chris
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Chris Mattmann, Ph.D.
Chief Architect
Instrument Software and Science Data Systems Section (398)
NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA
Office: 168-519, Mailstop: 168-527
Email: chris.a.mattmann@nasa.gov
WWW: http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Adjunct Associate Professor, Computer Science Department
University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
-----Original Message-----
From: Konstantin Boudnik <co...@apache.org>
Reply-To: <ge...@incubator.apache.org>
Date: Wednesday, September 3, 2014 10:11 PM
To: <ge...@incubator.apache.org>
Subject: Re: Mentors heartbeat
>Arguably, the number of mentored project doesn't reflect "the activity"
>per
>se. Unless I am missing something.
>
>Cos
>
>On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 04:46AM, Mattmann, Chris A (3980) wrote:
>> Guys, +1 to eventually doing this with JSON and YAML. The big problem
>> I see is curation (someone has to maintain it). Right now board reports
>> and the wiki are what's used to make the report, so feel free to use my
>> scripts for now until those are changed over. For example, I just ran
>>them
>> right now (with some major pythonic updates to sniff mentors, and to
>> map name to committer ID, and updating years and months to current and
>> here's what I get):
>>
>> 29 phunt
>> 24 tomwhite
>> 24 rvs
>> 24 mattmann
>> 23 cdouglas
>> 20 hsaputra
>> 18 bdelacretaz
>> 18 arvind
>> 16 adc
>> 14 smarru
>> 14 rgardler
>> 14 olamy
>> 14 gates
>> 13 jfarrell
>> 12 kevan
>> 11 tdunning
>> 11 jim
>> 11 grobmeier
>> 11 ddas
>> 10 omalley
>> 9 mfranklin
>> 8 wave
>> 8 lresende
>> 8 jbonofre
>> 8 ate
>> 7 twilliams
>> 7 rfrovarp
>> 7 ke4qqq
>> 7 jukka
>> 6 jzb
>> 6 acmurthy
>> 5 struberg
>> 5 nslater
>> 5 marrs
>> 5 lewismc
>> 5 greddin
>> 5 bodewig
>> 4 thorsten
>> 4 mahadev
>> 4 joes
>> 4 jghoman
>> 4 gsingers
>> 4 fmui
>> 3 upayavira
>> 3 tommaso
>> 3 stevenn
>> 3 ssc
>> 3 snoopdave
>> 3 nick
>> 3 marvin
>> 3 hwright
>> 3 gstein
>> 3 gianugo
>> 3 chipchilders
>> 3 benh
>> 3 apurtell
>> 2 todd
>> 2 larsh
>> 2 jochen
>> 2 jmclean
>> 2 dkulp
>> 2 dennisl
>> 2 dashorst
>> 2 cutting
>> 2 antelder
>> 1 yegor
>> 1 wrowe
>> 1 wavw
>> 1 stack
>> 1 simonetripodi
>> 1 robweir
>> 1 rmannibucau
>> 1 rfeng
>> 1 rbircher
>> 1 nandana
>> 1 mnour
>> 1 jvermillard
>> 1 fchrist
>> 1 enis
>> 1 elecharny
>> 1 cos
>> 1 coheigea
>> 1 brett
>> 1 bmargulies
>> 1 berndf
>> 1 asavory
>> 1 ant
>> 1 akarasulu
>> 1 ahart
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> Chris Mattmann, Ph.D.
>> Chief Architect
>> Instrument Software and Science Data Systems Section (398)
>> NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA
>> Office: 168-519, Mailstop: 168-527
>> Email: chris.a.mattmann@nasa.gov
>> WWW: http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/
>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> Adjunct Associate Professor, Computer Science Department
>> University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA
>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: "Alan D. Cabrera" <li...@toolazydogs.com>
>> Reply-To: "general@incubator.apache.org" <ge...@incubator.apache.org>
>> Date: Sunday, August 24, 2014 10:54 AM
>> To: "general@incubator.apache.org" <ge...@incubator.apache.org>
>> Subject: Re: Mentors heartbeat
>>
>> >
>> >On Aug 24, 2014, at 10:51 AM, Alan D. Cabrera <li...@toolazydogs.com>
>> >wrote:
>> >
>> >>>> I am not so sure if its worth while with the board report.
>> >>
>> >> What's good for the goose is good for the gander. Having the board
>> >>report in machine readable formats provides the same advantages as
>>that
>> >>afforded incubator reports.
>> >
>> >If these machine readable reports work out, I see no reason why they
>> >would not, then I predict an explosion of tool driven processes, e.g.
>> >release voting, podling acceptance and graduation votes, etc.
>> >
>> >
>> >Regards,
>> >Alan
>> >
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
Re: Mentors heartbeat
Posted by "Mattmann, Chris A (3980)" <ch...@jpl.nasa.gov>.
These are the "signed off" per month mentors per podling over
the last 3 years. So it measures how many times a mentor has
signed off (summed across all podlings) during that time span.
Cheers,
Chris
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Chris Mattmann, Ph.D.
Chief Architect
Instrument Software and Science Data Systems Section (398)
NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA
Office: 168-519, Mailstop: 168-527
Email: chris.a.mattmann@nasa.gov
WWW: http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Adjunct Associate Professor, Computer Science Department
University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
-----Original Message-----
From: Konstantin Boudnik <co...@apache.org>
Reply-To: <ge...@incubator.apache.org>
Date: Wednesday, September 3, 2014 10:11 PM
To: <ge...@incubator.apache.org>
Subject: Re: Mentors heartbeat
>Arguably, the number of mentored project doesn't reflect "the activity"
>per
>se. Unless I am missing something.
>
>Cos
>
>On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 04:46AM, Mattmann, Chris A (3980) wrote:
>> Guys, +1 to eventually doing this with JSON and YAML. The big problem
>> I see is curation (someone has to maintain it). Right now board reports
>> and the wiki are what's used to make the report, so feel free to use my
>> scripts for now until those are changed over. For example, I just ran
>>them
>> right now (with some major pythonic updates to sniff mentors, and to
>> map name to committer ID, and updating years and months to current and
>> here's what I get):
>>
>> 29 phunt
>> 24 tomwhite
>> 24 rvs
>> 24 mattmann
>> 23 cdouglas
>> 20 hsaputra
>> 18 bdelacretaz
>> 18 arvind
>> 16 adc
>> 14 smarru
>> 14 rgardler
>> 14 olamy
>> 14 gates
>> 13 jfarrell
>> 12 kevan
>> 11 tdunning
>> 11 jim
>> 11 grobmeier
>> 11 ddas
>> 10 omalley
>> 9 mfranklin
>> 8 wave
>> 8 lresende
>> 8 jbonofre
>> 8 ate
>> 7 twilliams
>> 7 rfrovarp
>> 7 ke4qqq
>> 7 jukka
>> 6 jzb
>> 6 acmurthy
>> 5 struberg
>> 5 nslater
>> 5 marrs
>> 5 lewismc
>> 5 greddin
>> 5 bodewig
>> 4 thorsten
>> 4 mahadev
>> 4 joes
>> 4 jghoman
>> 4 gsingers
>> 4 fmui
>> 3 upayavira
>> 3 tommaso
>> 3 stevenn
>> 3 ssc
>> 3 snoopdave
>> 3 nick
>> 3 marvin
>> 3 hwright
>> 3 gstein
>> 3 gianugo
>> 3 chipchilders
>> 3 benh
>> 3 apurtell
>> 2 todd
>> 2 larsh
>> 2 jochen
>> 2 jmclean
>> 2 dkulp
>> 2 dennisl
>> 2 dashorst
>> 2 cutting
>> 2 antelder
>> 1 yegor
>> 1 wrowe
>> 1 wavw
>> 1 stack
>> 1 simonetripodi
>> 1 robweir
>> 1 rmannibucau
>> 1 rfeng
>> 1 rbircher
>> 1 nandana
>> 1 mnour
>> 1 jvermillard
>> 1 fchrist
>> 1 enis
>> 1 elecharny
>> 1 cos
>> 1 coheigea
>> 1 brett
>> 1 bmargulies
>> 1 berndf
>> 1 asavory
>> 1 ant
>> 1 akarasulu
>> 1 ahart
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> Chris Mattmann, Ph.D.
>> Chief Architect
>> Instrument Software and Science Data Systems Section (398)
>> NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA
>> Office: 168-519, Mailstop: 168-527
>> Email: chris.a.mattmann@nasa.gov
>> WWW: http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/
>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> Adjunct Associate Professor, Computer Science Department
>> University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA
>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: "Alan D. Cabrera" <li...@toolazydogs.com>
>> Reply-To: "general@incubator.apache.org" <ge...@incubator.apache.org>
>> Date: Sunday, August 24, 2014 10:54 AM
>> To: "general@incubator.apache.org" <ge...@incubator.apache.org>
>> Subject: Re: Mentors heartbeat
>>
>> >
>> >On Aug 24, 2014, at 10:51 AM, Alan D. Cabrera <li...@toolazydogs.com>
>> >wrote:
>> >
>> >>>> I am not so sure if its worth while with the board report.
>> >>
>> >> What's good for the goose is good for the gander. Having the board
>> >>report in machine readable formats provides the same advantages as
>>that
>> >>afforded incubator reports.
>> >
>> >If these machine readable reports work out, I see no reason why they
>> >would not, then I predict an explosion of tool driven processes, e.g.
>> >release voting, podling acceptance and graduation votes, etc.
>> >
>> >
>> >Regards,
>> >Alan
>> >
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org