You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@lucene.apache.org by "Hoss Man (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2014/08/15 08:52:18 UTC

[jira] [Updated] (SOLR-6342) Solr should mention CHANGES from Lucene which have side effects in Solr

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-6342?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Hoss Man updated SOLR-6342:
---------------------------

    Attachment: SOLR-6342.patch

Attaching a quick patch along the lines of what i described before ... i think this is good to go, but i might be missing something. ([~steve_rowe], [~thetaphi], ... other build.xml folks: see any red flags here?)

bq. Slightly unrelated but maybe we could also fix the problem pointed out...

more like completely unrelated - there's nothing about our build system or the CHANGES.txt file itself that needs modified to address that request, we should just start including the appropriate link in our release notes (we only have to remember to do it once, after that the "header" of the last release announcement usually just gets copied for the next one, etc...)

> Solr should mention CHANGES from Lucene which have side effects in Solr
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SOLR-6342
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-6342
>             Project: Solr
>          Issue Type: Bug
>            Reporter: Varun Thacker
>         Attachments: SOLR-6342.patch
>
>
> This is the problem that I faced - A user upgraded Solr from 4.0 to 4.9 and the queries being formed were behaving differently.
> I tracked it down to LUCENE-5180 ( which I believe is the correct thing to do ) . The problem is since Solr does't ship with the Lucene CHANGES.txt file and we didn't record this under the the Solr CHANGES.txt file also, a user is not aware of such changes when upgrading.
> I can think of two options - 
> 1. Duplicate the changes which have side effects in Solr under Solr's CHANGES.txt file also ( not sure if we do this already and that we missed this one ).
> 2. Be conservative and ship Solr binaries with the Lucene CHANGES.txt file also
> We should address this problem



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org