You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to oak-dev@jackrabbit.apache.org by Marcel Reutegger <mr...@adobe.com> on 2015/09/14 11:19:46 UTC
[VOTE] Release Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.3.6
Hi,
A candidate for the Jackrabbit Oak 1.3.6 release is available at:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/jackrabbit/oak/1.3.6/
The release candidate is a zip archive of the sources in:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/jackrabbit/oak/tags/jackrabbit-oak-1.3.6/
The SHA1 checksum of the archive is 6180169c90ad12fd135e7d51a506e8295106ec74.
A staged Maven repository is available for review at:
https://repository.apache.org/
The command for running automated checks against this release candidate is:
$ sh check-release.sh oak 1.3.6 6180169c90ad12fd135e7d51a506e8295106ec74
Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.3.6.
The vote is open for the next 72 hours and passes if a majority of at
least three +1 Jackrabbit PMC votes are cast.
[ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.3.6
[ ] -1 Do not release this package because...
Regards
Marcel
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.3.6
Posted by Michael Dürig <md...@apache.org>.
On 14.9.15 11:19 , Marcel Reutegger wrote:
> [X] +1 Release this package as Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.3.6
Michael
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.3.6
Posted by Amit Jain <am...@ieee.org>.
On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 2:49 PM, Marcel Reutegger <mr...@adobe.com>
wrote:
> Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.3.6.
> The vote is open for the next 72 hours and passes if a majority of at
> least three +1 Jackrabbit PMC votes are cast.
>
+1. All checks Ok.
Thanks
Amit
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.3.6
Posted by Marcel Reutegger <mr...@adobe.com>.
On 14/09/15 11:19, "Marcel Reutegger" wrote:
>Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.3.6.
>The vote is open for the next 72 hours and passes if a majority of at
>least three +1 Jackrabbit PMC votes are cast.
this release also contains the regression introduced by OAK-2929.
For an unstable release it may not be severe enough to cancel it.
I'm voting +1 for the release, but if others think it's better
to cancel this release as well, I will change my vote.
Regards
Marcel