You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@jackrabbit.apache.org by Angelo Immediata <An...@libero.it> on 2007/01/16 15:47:57 UTC
JAckrabbit cluster
Hi all.
Sorry we are newby in JCR-170 and jackrabbit technology.
We are thinking to use jackrabbit for our CMS; we need a cluster feature; it seems that jsckrabbit can't be used in a clustered environment....how can we solve this?
Our scenario is to use jackrabbit on a server and this server is clustered with another node; when one of the 2 nodes is down the other node (the active one and, so, the other jackrabbit) must handle all the requests..is it a real scenario? How can we obtain it?
Thanx to all,
Angelo
------------------------------------------------------
Passa a Infostrada. ADSL e Telefono senza limiti e senza canone Telecom
http://click.libero.it/infostrada16gen07
Re: JAckrabbit cluster
Posted by Dominique Pfister <do...@day.com>.
Hi Michael,
there is an alternative journal implementation to be available in
jackrabbit 1.2.2, namely DatabaseJournal, that expects roughly the
same parameters as a database persistence manager. For more
information, please follow:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-702
Kind regards
Dominique
On 1/29/07, Michael Neale <mi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> will the "shared folder" itself use a persistance manager? so it could
> actually be a database table itself?
>
> Michael.
>
> On 1/29/07, Michael Neale <mi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > I would have thought for performance it would be a good idea to keep the
> > indexes local to the nodes anyway, so this is perhaps a good thing (short of
> > using a distributed cache/remote expiry notification mechanism).
> >
> > Looking good for 1.2 !
> >
> > On 1/27/07, Dominique Pfister <do...@day.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > Currently not. Another nodes in the cluster will be informed about the
> > > changes made and individually update their search index.
> > >
> > > Kind regards
> > > Dominique
> > >
> > > On 1/26/07, Skripnikov < maxim.s@voliacable.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Will this clustering support include lucene's index clustering?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Dominique Pfister wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Hi Angelo,
> > > > >
> > > > > On 1/16/07, Angelo Immediata <An...@libero.it> wrote:
> > > > >> We are thinking to use jackrabbit for our CMS; we need a cluster
> > > feature;
> > > > >> it seems
> > > > >> that jsckrabbit can't be used in a clustered environment....how can
> > > we
> > > > >> solve this?
> > > > >
> > > > > In the soon to be released Apache Jackrabbit 1.2 clustering support
> > > > > has been added. Required are a PersistenceManager that uses a shared
> > >
> > > > > resource (such as a standalone database) and a shared folder needed
> > > to
> > > > > log changes and synchronize writes.
> > > > >
> > > > > For more information, please take a look at the following article:
> > > > >
> > > > > http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.apache.jackrabbit.devel/9381
> > > > >
> > > > > Kind regards
> > > > > Dominique
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/JAckrabbit-cluster-tf3021331.html#a8651655
> > >
> > > > Sent from the Jackrabbit - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
>
Re: JAckrabbit cluster
Posted by Michael Neale <mi...@gmail.com>.
will the "shared folder" itself use a persistance manager? so it could
actually be a database table itself?
Michael.
On 1/29/07, Michael Neale <mi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I would have thought for performance it would be a good idea to keep the
> indexes local to the nodes anyway, so this is perhaps a good thing (short of
> using a distributed cache/remote expiry notification mechanism).
>
> Looking good for 1.2 !
>
> On 1/27/07, Dominique Pfister <do...@day.com> wrote:
> >
> > Currently not. Another nodes in the cluster will be informed about the
> > changes made and individually update their search index.
> >
> > Kind regards
> > Dominique
> >
> > On 1/26/07, Skripnikov < maxim.s@voliacable.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > Will this clustering support include lucene's index clustering?
> > >
> > >
> > > Dominique Pfister wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Hi Angelo,
> > > >
> > > > On 1/16/07, Angelo Immediata <An...@libero.it> wrote:
> > > >> We are thinking to use jackrabbit for our CMS; we need a cluster
> > feature;
> > > >> it seems
> > > >> that jsckrabbit can't be used in a clustered environment....how can
> > we
> > > >> solve this?
> > > >
> > > > In the soon to be released Apache Jackrabbit 1.2 clustering support
> > > > has been added. Required are a PersistenceManager that uses a shared
> >
> > > > resource (such as a standalone database) and a shared folder needed
> > to
> > > > log changes and synchronize writes.
> > > >
> > > > For more information, please take a look at the following article:
> > > >
> > > > http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.apache.jackrabbit.devel/9381
> > > >
> > > > Kind regards
> > > > Dominique
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/JAckrabbit-cluster-tf3021331.html#a8651655
> >
> > > Sent from the Jackrabbit - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> > >
> > >
> >
>
>
Re: JAckrabbit cluster
Posted by Michael Neale <mi...@gmail.com>.
I would have thought for performance it would be a good idea to keep the
indexes local to the nodes anyway, so this is perhaps a good thing (short of
using a distributed cache/remote expiry notification mechanism).
Looking good for 1.2 !
On 1/27/07, Dominique Pfister <do...@day.com> wrote:
>
> Currently not. Another nodes in the cluster will be informed about the
> changes made and individually update their search index.
>
> Kind regards
> Dominique
>
> On 1/26/07, Skripnikov <ma...@voliacable.com> wrote:
> >
> > Will this clustering support include lucene's index clustering?
> >
> >
> > Dominique Pfister wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi Angelo,
> > >
> > > On 1/16/07, Angelo Immediata <An...@libero.it> wrote:
> > >> We are thinking to use jackrabbit for our CMS; we need a cluster
> feature;
> > >> it seems
> > >> that jsckrabbit can't be used in a clustered environment....how can
> we
> > >> solve this?
> > >
> > > In the soon to be released Apache Jackrabbit 1.2 clustering support
> > > has been added. Required are a PersistenceManager that uses a shared
> > > resource (such as a standalone database) and a shared folder needed to
> > > log changes and synchronize writes.
> > >
> > > For more information, please take a look at the following article:
> > >
> > > http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.apache.jackrabbit.devel/9381
> > >
> > > Kind regards
> > > Dominique
> > >
> > >
> >
> > --
> > View this message in context:
> http://www.nabble.com/JAckrabbit-cluster-tf3021331.html#a8651655
> > Sent from the Jackrabbit - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> >
> >
>
Re: JAckrabbit cluster
Posted by Dominique Pfister <do...@day.com>.
Currently not. Another nodes in the cluster will be informed about the
changes made and individually update their search index.
Kind regards
Dominique
On 1/26/07, Skripnikov <ma...@voliacable.com> wrote:
>
> Will this clustering support include lucene's index clustering?
>
>
> Dominique Pfister wrote:
> >
> > Hi Angelo,
> >
> > On 1/16/07, Angelo Immediata <An...@libero.it> wrote:
> >> We are thinking to use jackrabbit for our CMS; we need a cluster feature;
> >> it seems
> >> that jsckrabbit can't be used in a clustered environment....how can we
> >> solve this?
> >
> > In the soon to be released Apache Jackrabbit 1.2 clustering support
> > has been added. Required are a PersistenceManager that uses a shared
> > resource (such as a standalone database) and a shared folder needed to
> > log changes and synchronize writes.
> >
> > For more information, please take a look at the following article:
> >
> > http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.apache.jackrabbit.devel/9381
> >
> > Kind regards
> > Dominique
> >
> >
>
> --
> View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/JAckrabbit-cluster-tf3021331.html#a8651655
> Sent from the Jackrabbit - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>
Re: JAckrabbit cluster
Posted by Skripnikov <ma...@voliacable.com>.
Will this clustering support include lucene's index clustering?
Dominique Pfister wrote:
>
> Hi Angelo,
>
> On 1/16/07, Angelo Immediata <An...@libero.it> wrote:
>> We are thinking to use jackrabbit for our CMS; we need a cluster feature;
>> it seems
>> that jsckrabbit can't be used in a clustered environment....how can we
>> solve this?
>
> In the soon to be released Apache Jackrabbit 1.2 clustering support
> has been added. Required are a PersistenceManager that uses a shared
> resource (such as a standalone database) and a shared folder needed to
> log changes and synchronize writes.
>
> For more information, please take a look at the following article:
>
> http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.apache.jackrabbit.devel/9381
>
> Kind regards
> Dominique
>
>
--
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/JAckrabbit-cluster-tf3021331.html#a8651655
Sent from the Jackrabbit - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: JAckrabbit cluster
Posted by Dominique Pfister <do...@day.com>.
Hi Angelo,
On 1/16/07, Angelo Immediata <An...@libero.it> wrote:
> We are thinking to use jackrabbit for our CMS; we need a cluster feature; it seems
> that jsckrabbit can't be used in a clustered environment....how can we solve this?
In the soon to be released Apache Jackrabbit 1.2 clustering support
has been added. Required are a PersistenceManager that uses a shared
resource (such as a standalone database) and a shared folder needed to
log changes and synchronize writes.
For more information, please take a look at the following article:
http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.apache.jackrabbit.devel/9381
Kind regards
Dominique