You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@subversion.apache.org by sv...@mobsol.be on 2006/09/21 09:51:09 UTC

Re: [Issue 2610] Out-of-tree .svn directories

Hi Alessio,


thanks for your reply on issue 2610. I'm going to close it as duplicate, but I'd
like to answer your questions too (here on the users list).

I'll try to clarify my original answers to your request:

Quoting amassaro@tigris.org:
> 1) The "curruptible .svn dirs" problem has been discussed, but the discussion
> didn't seem to come to any conclusion. As far as solutions go, I thought the
> svn engineers were more qualified to discern good ideas from crazy talk.

1. This is just a tooling problem. The users and dev mailing list are the
perfect place for discussions. Note that some Subversion developers also read
the users mailing list. The issue tracker is not so good for discussions, so we
like to keep only the outcome of the discussions there with a reference to the
mail threads. This will help the people looking at the issue to easily find
what discussions have already been done, and why certain conclusions were
drawn.

> 2) May I suggest something? I think that, in general, in life, people don't
> really need to be taught this kind of lessons. Unless, of course, they come
> in claiming they hold the ultimate truth/solution. And, in that case you can
> call them "prophets" and let them enjoy the sound of their own voice :-)

2. This was not the message I wanted to send. For me the issue tracker is a tool
which keeps track of the *problems* people have with Subversion. Your suggested
solution is more than welcome, but by focusing on the solution instead of the
problem it's more difficult for people to suggest maybe better solutions (if
they exist).
Practically I mean that the summary of this issue should have been something
like 'text-base gets corrupted easily by recursive find and replace' with your
suggested solution in the comments.

> 3) Yes, #525 covers this. I'll add my comments there.

3. Thanks.

regards,

Lieven.






----------------------------------------------------------------
This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org

Discussion tooling for the Subversion project

Posted by MASSARO Alessio <Al...@oxinst.co.uk>.
Lieven,

This is about the "discussion tooling" part of your reply, and therefore not
really related to Subversion. I'm assuming Subversion uses scarab.tigris.org
and therefore posting to their user mailing list too.

I happen to use trac.edgewall.org (a popular competitor of Scarab) for our
projects. For each issue Trac has a Description text field that can be
edited only by the project engineers to summarize the discussion that takes
place in the comments. Comments can be added by anybody that has access to
the project. AFAICS adding the same feature to scarab would give the best of
both worlds (mailing list and issue tracker) in one place. For one thing, I,
as a user, would love to have a one-stop-shop with the whole thing
(discussion+conclusions+current state of affairs for the issue). And my
(wild) guess is that this enhancement would be nearly trivial to add to
scarab.

Regards
-alessio


> -----Original Message-----
> From: svnlgo@mobsol.be [mailto:svnlgo@mobsol.be] 
> Sent: 21 September 2006 10:51
> To: users@subversion.tigris.org; amassaro@tigris.org
> Subject: Re: [Issue 2610] Out-of-tree .svn directories
> 
> Hi Alessio,
> 
> 
> thanks for your reply on issue 2610. I'm going to close it as 
> duplicate, but I'd like to answer your questions too (here on 
> the users list).
> 
> I'll try to clarify my original answers to your request:
> 
> Quoting amassaro@tigris.org:
> > 1) The "curruptible .svn dirs" problem has been discussed, but the 
> > discussion didn't seem to come to any conclusion. As far as 
> solutions 
> > go, I thought the svn engineers were more qualified to 
> discern good ideas from crazy talk.
> 
> 1. This is just a tooling problem. The users and dev mailing 
> list are the perfect place for discussions. Note that some 
> Subversion developers also read the users mailing list. The 
> issue tracker is not so good for discussions, so we like to 
> keep only the outcome of the discussions there with a 
> reference to the mail threads. This will help the people 
> looking at the issue to easily find what discussions have 
> already been done, and why certain conclusions were drawn.
> ...

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org