You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@hbase.apache.org by Andrew Purtell <ap...@apache.org> on 2014/07/22 17:59:39 UTC
Thinking about rolling 0.98.5RC0 on August 4
I'm thinking about rolling 0.98.5RC0 on August 4 to return to having 0.98
releases happen in the beginning of a month as was typical up until 0.98.4.
There have been 10 issues resolved for 0.98.5 already, and there are 8
working days / 12 calendar days until 8/4 for additional work to land. Any
concerns about this?
--
Best regards,
- Andy
Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein
(via Tom White)
Re: Thinking about rolling 0.98.5RC0 on August 4
Posted by Andrew Purtell <ap...@apache.org>.
Hey Enis, I know you are away but I'm still pinging you on relevant JIRAs
for your reference upon your return.
On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 3:54 PM, Enis Söztutar <en...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Thanks Andrew. Just skimmed over the jiras there. Nothing concerning for
> now.
>
> Enis
>
>
> On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 4:51 PM, Andrew Purtell <ap...@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
> > Hi Enis,
> >
> > Thanks.
> >
> > I would prefer option 1.
> >
> > There are 11 changes pending for .5. I just moved HBASE-10560 out on
> > account of it being potentially controversial.
> >
> > When you have a moment, please do a JQL search for 'project = HBase AND
> > fixVersion = 0.98.5 AND statusCategory not in (Complete)' and let me know
> > if you find any of them concerning.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 3:29 PM, Enis Söztutar <en...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > > Hey Andrew,
> > >
> > > I will be off for 2 weeks between 7/26 and 8/10. Obviously I cannot
> > review
> > > patches for branch-1 in a timely manner in that time window.
> > >
> > > I think we can do either:
> > > 1. we commit patches that you accept to 0.98 to branch-1 as well. I'll
> > go
> > > over the patches once I am back, and hopefully before the RC vote ends
> > > (though I do not expect we will need to revert a patch).
> > > 2. commit patches to master only (except bug fixes) and I'll do a bulk
> > > review when I get back and then you can spin the RC.
> > >
> > > At this stage of branch-1, I think most of the patches applicable to
> 0.98
> > > should be acceptable to branch-1 as well, so I would recommend we do 1.
> > > What do you think?
> > >
> > > BTW, I also intend to spin the first 0.99.0RC around Aug 12.
> > >
> > > Enis
> > >
> > >
> > > On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 8:59 AM, Andrew Purtell <ap...@apache.org>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > I'm thinking about rolling 0.98.5RC0 on August 4 to return to having
> > 0.98
> > > > releases happen in the beginning of a month as was typical up until
> > > 0.98.4.
> > > > There have been 10 issues resolved for 0.98.5 already, and there are
> 8
> > > > working days / 12 calendar days until 8/4 for additional work to
> land.
> > > Any
> > > > concerns about this?
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Best regards,
> > > >
> > > > - Andy
> > > >
> > > > Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet
> > Hein
> > > > (via Tom White)
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Best regards,
> >
> > - Andy
> >
> > Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein
> > (via Tom White)
> >
>
--
Best regards,
- Andy
Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein
(via Tom White)
Re: Thinking about rolling 0.98.5RC0 on August 4
Posted by Enis Söztutar <en...@gmail.com>.
Thanks Andrew. Just skimmed over the jiras there. Nothing concerning for
now.
Enis
On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 4:51 PM, Andrew Purtell <ap...@apache.org> wrote:
> Hi Enis,
>
> Thanks.
>
> I would prefer option 1.
>
> There are 11 changes pending for .5. I just moved HBASE-10560 out on
> account of it being potentially controversial.
>
> When you have a moment, please do a JQL search for 'project = HBase AND
> fixVersion = 0.98.5 AND statusCategory not in (Complete)' and let me know
> if you find any of them concerning.
>
>
>
>
> On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 3:29 PM, Enis Söztutar <en...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Hey Andrew,
> >
> > I will be off for 2 weeks between 7/26 and 8/10. Obviously I cannot
> review
> > patches for branch-1 in a timely manner in that time window.
> >
> > I think we can do either:
> > 1. we commit patches that you accept to 0.98 to branch-1 as well. I'll
> go
> > over the patches once I am back, and hopefully before the RC vote ends
> > (though I do not expect we will need to revert a patch).
> > 2. commit patches to master only (except bug fixes) and I'll do a bulk
> > review when I get back and then you can spin the RC.
> >
> > At this stage of branch-1, I think most of the patches applicable to 0.98
> > should be acceptable to branch-1 as well, so I would recommend we do 1.
> > What do you think?
> >
> > BTW, I also intend to spin the first 0.99.0RC around Aug 12.
> >
> > Enis
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 8:59 AM, Andrew Purtell <ap...@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > I'm thinking about rolling 0.98.5RC0 on August 4 to return to having
> 0.98
> > > releases happen in the beginning of a month as was typical up until
> > 0.98.4.
> > > There have been 10 issues resolved for 0.98.5 already, and there are 8
> > > working days / 12 calendar days until 8/4 for additional work to land.
> > Any
> > > concerns about this?
> > >
> > > --
> > > Best regards,
> > >
> > > - Andy
> > >
> > > Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet
> Hein
> > > (via Tom White)
> > >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Best regards,
>
> - Andy
>
> Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein
> (via Tom White)
>
Re: Thinking about rolling 0.98.5RC0 on August 4
Posted by Andrew Purtell <ap...@apache.org>.
Hi Enis,
Thanks.
I would prefer option 1.
There are 11 changes pending for .5. I just moved HBASE-10560 out on
account of it being potentially controversial.
When you have a moment, please do a JQL search for 'project = HBase AND
fixVersion = 0.98.5 AND statusCategory not in (Complete)' and let me know
if you find any of them concerning.
On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 3:29 PM, Enis Söztutar <en...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hey Andrew,
>
> I will be off for 2 weeks between 7/26 and 8/10. Obviously I cannot review
> patches for branch-1 in a timely manner in that time window.
>
> I think we can do either:
> 1. we commit patches that you accept to 0.98 to branch-1 as well. I'll go
> over the patches once I am back, and hopefully before the RC vote ends
> (though I do not expect we will need to revert a patch).
> 2. commit patches to master only (except bug fixes) and I'll do a bulk
> review when I get back and then you can spin the RC.
>
> At this stage of branch-1, I think most of the patches applicable to 0.98
> should be acceptable to branch-1 as well, so I would recommend we do 1.
> What do you think?
>
> BTW, I also intend to spin the first 0.99.0RC around Aug 12.
>
> Enis
>
>
> On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 8:59 AM, Andrew Purtell <ap...@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
> > I'm thinking about rolling 0.98.5RC0 on August 4 to return to having 0.98
> > releases happen in the beginning of a month as was typical up until
> 0.98.4.
> > There have been 10 issues resolved for 0.98.5 already, and there are 8
> > working days / 12 calendar days until 8/4 for additional work to land.
> Any
> > concerns about this?
> >
> > --
> > Best regards,
> >
> > - Andy
> >
> > Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein
> > (via Tom White)
> >
>
--
Best regards,
- Andy
Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein
(via Tom White)
Re: Thinking about rolling 0.98.5RC0 on August 4
Posted by Enis Söztutar <en...@gmail.com>.
Hey Andrew,
I will be off for 2 weeks between 7/26 and 8/10. Obviously I cannot review
patches for branch-1 in a timely manner in that time window.
I think we can do either:
1. we commit patches that you accept to 0.98 to branch-1 as well. I'll go
over the patches once I am back, and hopefully before the RC vote ends
(though I do not expect we will need to revert a patch).
2. commit patches to master only (except bug fixes) and I'll do a bulk
review when I get back and then you can spin the RC.
At this stage of branch-1, I think most of the patches applicable to 0.98
should be acceptable to branch-1 as well, so I would recommend we do 1.
What do you think?
BTW, I also intend to spin the first 0.99.0RC around Aug 12.
Enis
On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 8:59 AM, Andrew Purtell <ap...@apache.org> wrote:
> I'm thinking about rolling 0.98.5RC0 on August 4 to return to having 0.98
> releases happen in the beginning of a month as was typical up until 0.98.4.
> There have been 10 issues resolved for 0.98.5 already, and there are 8
> working days / 12 calendar days until 8/4 for additional work to land. Any
> concerns about this?
>
> --
> Best regards,
>
> - Andy
>
> Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein
> (via Tom White)
>