You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@httpd.apache.org by Marc Slemko <ma...@znep.com> on 1998/05/08 18:45:27 UTC
other/2206: no extension on log files (fwd)
I have never had a problem with windows "*really*" liking to see
extensions on my logfiles.
Is doing this junk really necessary?
---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: 8 May 1998 16:04:49 -0000
From: "A.Poindexter" <al...@nettown.com>
To: apbugs@hyperreal.org
Subject: other/2206: no extension on log files
>Number: 2206
>Category: other
>Synopsis: no extension on log files
>Confidential: no
>Severity: non-critical
>Priority: medium
>Responsible: apache
>State: open
>Class: sw-bug
>Submitter-Id: apache
>Arrival-Date: Fri May 8 09:10:00 PDT 1998
>Last-Modified:
>Originator: alpo@nettown.com
>Organization:
apache
>Release: Apache/1.3b6
>Environment:
Windows_NT ESP 4 00 586
>Description:
The log files (access_log and error_log) do not have an extension,
which windows *really* likes to see.
>How-To-Repeat:
Run the server on an NT box
>Fix:
I suggest appending .txt to these.
>Audit-Trail:
>Unformatted:
[In order for any reply to be added to the PR database, ]
[you need to include <ap...@Apache.Org> in the Cc line ]
[and leave the subject line UNCHANGED. This is not done]
[automatically because of the potential for mail loops. ]