You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@jackrabbit.apache.org by "Christian Wolfe (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2015/10/07 01:34:27 UTC

[jira] [Issue Comment Deleted] (JCR-3916) ConnectionFactory should use driver name to determine validation query

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-3916?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Christian Wolfe updated JCR-3916:
---------------------------------
    Comment: was deleted

(was: This patch contains the necessary changes to the {{ConnectionFactory}} class. It does not yet contain working tests. )

> ConnectionFactory should use driver name to determine validation query
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: JCR-3916
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-3916
>             Project: Jackrabbit Content Repository
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: jackrabbit-data
>    Affects Versions: 2.11.1
>            Reporter: Christian Wolfe
>            Priority: Minor
>
> Currently, the {{guessValidationQuery}} method in the {{ConnectionFactory}} class uses the JDBC URL to determine which database is being used (and thus what syntax to use for the validation query for the connection pool).
> This approach should work in most cases, but it could potentially fail if the server's hostname contains the name of a database within it.
> For example, say your team has a server with an Oracle database used for testing, named oracle-1.company.com. And let's say you decide to install a PostgreSQL instance on oracle-1 to use for additional testing. The JDBC URL would look something like jdbc:postgresql://oracle-1.company.com/database.
> In its current state, {{guessValidationQuery}} would guess that this is an Oracle database, and would use the wrong validation query.
> One solution to this would be to instead use the name of the JDBC driver class to determine which database is being used.
> I have a patch for this solution, but it only changes the class. I haven't been able to figure out how to refactor the tests in any way that would be clean and easy.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)