Why is the pluginRepository restricted Codehaus only

[Minto van der Sluis <mi...@xup.nl>]

Hi Folks,

Why does the Isis root pom contain the following section?

    <pluginRepositories>
        <pluginRepository>
            <id>Codehaus Repository</id>
            <url>http://repository.codehaus.org/</url>
          <snapshots>
        <enabled>false</enabled>
          </snapshots>
        </pluginRepository>
    </pluginRepositories>

On a fresh build it fails to retrieve the nucleus maven plugin. Removing
this section makes the build download the nucleus maven plugin.

Regards,

Minto

-- 
ir. ing. Minto van der Sluis
Software innovator / renovator
Xup BV

Re: Why is the pluginRepository restricted Codehaus only

[Dan Haywood <da...@haywood-associates.co.uk>]

Hi Minto,
odd.  Short answer is I don't know why the root pom contains that section,
nor why having it there or not makes any difference.  Looking at the
effective pom with or without that section looks the same to me.

At any rate, I've removed it.  I also have removed the UK mirror in the
<repositories> section; I remember that Rob and I (being UK based) put that
in a long while back for our own convenience; but it really ought to live
in our own ~/m2/settings.xml.

Change committed.

Dan

On 17 November 2012 11:34, Minto van der Sluis <mi...@xup.nl> wrote:

> Hi Folks,
>
> Why does the Isis root pom contain the following section?
>
>     <pluginRepositories>
>         <pluginRepository>
>             <id>Codehaus Repository</id>
>             <url>http://repository.codehaus.org/</url>
>           <snapshots>
>         <enabled>false</enabled>
>           </snapshots>
>         </pluginRepository>
>     </pluginRepositories>
>
> On a fresh build it fails to retrieve the nucleus maven plugin. Removing
> this section makes the build download the nucleus maven plugin.
>
> Regards,
>
> Minto
>
> --
> ir. ing. Minto van der Sluis
> Software innovator / renovator
> Xup BV
>
>