You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@maven.apache.org by "Matthias Bünger (Jira)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2025/01/26 06:31:00 UTC

[jira] [Commented] (MNGSITE-368) Naming conventions should be more technical

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MNGSITE-368?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17917022#comment-17917022 ] 

Matthias Bünger commented on MNGSITE-368:
-----------------------------------------

[~slachiewicz]

Was resolved with. 
https://github.com/apache/maven-site/pull/642

Please close.

> Naming conventions should be more technical
> -------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: MNGSITE-368
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MNGSITE-368
>             Project: Maven Project Web Site (Moved to GitHub Issues)
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: Elliotte Rusty Harold
>            Priority: Minor
>              Labels: documentation
>
> We should give a precise grammar for group IDs, artifact IDs and versions on https://maven.apache.org/guides/mini/guide-naming-conventions.html
> rather than fuzzy language like "you can choose whatever name you want with lowercase letters and no strange symbols"
> This can probably be done by reference to the Java naming rules rather than spelling it out.
> The version section should mention semantic versioning and Snapshots. 



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)