You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to soap-user@xml.apache.org by Manish Saha <Ma...@ivl.stpt.soft.net> on 2001/04/11 17:04:30 UTC

is there any funda guys over there

	If your r passing a object from the client side to the server side
as a
parameter is it neccessary that both the server side and client side both
have this class(implementation).and with the present bean serielizer is it
only possible to serilize only objects with the get set method(bean
object).is there anyway to serilize and sent all user created objects

one general question

is it possible for some client in java to send an object(java) to a c++
service.how is it possible(how an object in java would be understood by
c++).then there will be object implementation of java on client side which
will be sent as a parameter and
which will be sent over the wire(seriliazed)and the seriliazer on the other
will create the class on c++.and that class will be available on the server
side.


and what is the basic difference between the different encodings.
soap,xmi,xml_literal.does it make any difference.when u encode a message
using soap and send it the server side should know how to decode that
depending on the encoding,so the proper decoders should be available.




are there any tutorial relation to such cross
platform distributed computing.



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: soap-user-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org
For additional commands, email: soap-user-help@xml.apache.org