You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to fop-dev@xmlgraphics.apache.org by bu...@apache.org on 2006/10/06 15:48:01 UTC
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 40695] New: - FO Basic link not working on line break
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG�
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40695>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND�
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40695
Summary: FO Basic link not working on line break
Product: Fop
Version: all
Platform: All
OS/Version: Solaris
Status: NEW
Severity: critical
Priority: P2
Component: general
AssignedTo: fop-dev@xmlgraphics.apache.org
ReportedBy: shriramsharma@ge.com
Hi,
I am using xsl fo to generate PDF. In order to make internal links work in PDF,
I have applied fo:basic-link under fo:inline element.
The issue that i am facing is that when the text on which there is a link is
too long and the text comes in more than one line, the link is only on starting
few characters and not on the rest of the text. But if the text comes in a
single line then the link appears on the entire text. So the issue really is
when the text is long and comes in more than one line the link is not properly
rendered.
Kindly help me on this as it is an urgent requirement.
Thanks,
Shriram
--
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 40695] - FO Basic link not working on line break
Posted by bu...@apache.org.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG�
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40695>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND�
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40695
bowditch_chris@hotmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEEDINFO |RESOLVED
Resolution| |WONTFIX
------- Additional Comments From bowditch_chris@hotmail.com 2006-10-09 02:49 -------
FOP 0.20.x is no longer supported. Please retest your FO on 0.92beta. Please
free to re-open the bug if your FO fails with 0.92beta.
--
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 40695] - FO Basic link not working on line break
Posted by bu...@apache.org.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG�
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40695>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND�
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40695
------- Additional Comments From a_l.delmelle@pandora.be 2006-10-30 22:23 -------
(In reply to comment #5)
> BTW: the producer field in the document properties seems to indicate this PDF wasn't produced with FOP
> at all...
Could it be that you're actually rendering to PostScript and then send the PS through Acrobat Distiller? If
so, the problem might be in the PS Renderer (long shot...)
--
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 40695] - FO Basic link not working on line break
Posted by bu...@apache.org.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG�
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40695>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND�
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40695
bowditch_chris@hotmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |NEEDINFO
------- Additional Comments From bowditch_chris@hotmail.com 2006-10-09 02:22 -------
Please state which version of FOP you are using: 0.20.5 or 0.92beta.
--
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 40695] - FO Basic link not working on line break
Posted by bu...@apache.org.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG�
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40695>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND�
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40695
gupta.vinod@ge.com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|RESOLVED |CLOSED
------- Additional Comments From gupta.vinod@ge.com 2006-12-21 05:04 -------
Yes, the document is post-processed by Adobe Distiller.
--
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 40695] - FO Basic link not working on line break
Posted by bu...@apache.org.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG�
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40695>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND�
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40695
gupta.vinod@ge.com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED
Resolution|WORKSFORME |
--
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 40695] - FO Basic link not working on line break
Posted by bu...@apache.org.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG�
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40695>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND�
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40695
shriramsharma@ge.com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Version|0.20.4 |0.92
--
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 40695] - FO Basic link not working on line break
Posted by bu...@apache.org.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG�
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40695>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND�
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40695
shriramsharma@ge.com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Version|all |0.20.4
--
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 40695] - FO Basic link not working on line break
Posted by bu...@apache.org.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG�
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40695>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND�
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40695
a_l.delmelle@pandora.be changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|REOPENED |NEEDINFO
------- Additional Comments From a_l.delmelle@pandora.be 2006-10-30 22:19 -------
Sorry, but the PDF by itself is not enough. Please post the FO, so we can run it through FOP ourselves to
debug this.
BTW: the producer field in the document properties seems to indicate this PDF wasn't produced with FOP
at all...
--
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 40695] - FO Basic link not working on line break
Posted by bu...@apache.org.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG�
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40695>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND�
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40695
shriramsharma@ge.com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED
Resolution|WONTFIX |
--
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 40695] - FO Basic link not working on line break
Posted by bu...@apache.org.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG�
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40695>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND�
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40695
------- Additional Comments From a_l.delmelle@pandora.be 2006-10-31 08:38 -------
(In reply to comment #8)
> If I run the FO file through fop (trunk and 0.92) I get an exception related to
> page sequences and regions.
Confirmed. Why would anyone file a bug against v0.92 when obviously not using that version at all?
Would like to repeat the following question to the OP:
Are you *absolutely certain* that FOP is even used to produce the erroneous PDF? Judging from the
metadata, the document was at least post-processed by Adobe Distiller.
If you can't provide the right info, we can't help you. Sorry, but that's just the way it works...
--
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 40695] - FO Basic link not working on line break
Posted by bu...@apache.org.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG�
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40695>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND�
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40695
------- Additional Comments From shriramsharma@ge.com 2006-10-30 21:24 -------
Created an attachment (id=19054)
--> (http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=19054&action=view)
sample pdf output
--
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 40695] - FO Basic link not working on line break
Posted by bu...@apache.org.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG�
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40695>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND�
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40695
spepping@apache.org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEEDINFO |RESOLVED
Resolution| |WORKSFORME
------- Additional Comments From spepping@apache.org 2006-12-21 04:54 -------
This works in FOP trunk and I am sure it works in FOP 0.92.
--
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 40695] - FO Basic link not working on line break
Posted by bu...@apache.org.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG�
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40695>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND�
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40695
manuel@apache.org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|REOPENED |RESOLVED
Resolution| |WORKSFORME
------- Additional Comments From manuel@apache.org 2006-10-19 04:17 -------
Tested this with a long multi-line internal and external link against fop trunk
and 0.92beta and it works fine.
If it doesn't work for you against these releases please reopen and attach a
sample fo file which shows the problem.
--
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 40695] - FO Basic link not working on line break
Posted by bu...@apache.org.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG�
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40695>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND�
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40695
------- Additional Comments From gupta.vinod@ge.com 2006-10-31 01:58 -------
Created an attachment (id=19057)
--> (http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=19057&action=view)
PDF FO file
--
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 40695] - FO Basic link not working on line break
Posted by bu...@apache.org.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG�
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40695>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND�
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40695
------- Additional Comments From manuel@apache.org 2006-10-31 04:09 -------
If I run the FO file through fop (trunk and 0.92) I get an exception related to
page sequences and regions.
Can you attach a working (and smaller if possible) version of the FO file please.
--
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.