External repo looks ok (was Re: Update about Utilities repo migration)

[Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com>]

A unix diff of the flex-external repo reports no errors.  It can be opened
for read-write.


On 3/29/13 12:02 AM, "Om" <bi...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> The flex-utilities git repo is now read/write.  It is available here:
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/flex-utilities.git
> 
> Also, https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/flex-external.git is up for
> review.  Alex, if you can get this reviewed, I will go ahead and ask them
> to open it up for read/write.
> 
> Thanks,
> Om
> 
> On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 8:04 AM, Jose Barragan <
> jose.barragan@codeoscopic.com> wrote:
> 
>> +1
>> --
>> Jose Barragan
>> Chief Software Architect
>> Codeoscopic Madrid
>> C/. Infanta Mercedes, 92.
>> Planta 5.  505.
>> 28020 Madrid.
>> Tel.: +34 912 94 80 80
>> 
>> On Mar 27, 2013, at 10:39 AM, Carlos Rovira <ca...@codeoscopic.com>
>> wrote:
>> 
>>> +1
>>> 
>>> 2013/3/27 Frédéric THOMAS <we...@hotmail.com>
>>> 
>>>> +1 too
>>>> 
>>>> -Fred
>>>> 
>>>> -----Message d'origine----- From: Erik de Bruin
>>>> Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2013 8:18 AM
>>>> To: dev@flex.apache.org
>>>> Subject: Re: Update about Utilities repo migration
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> +1
>>>> 
>>>> EdB
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 4:18 AM, Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> Yup, let's get it done.
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> On 3/26/13 7:55 PM, "Om" <bi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> Here is David@Infra's note about the missing history in the
>>>>>> flex-utilities
>>>>>> git repo.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> I think we should accept the repo as it is and move ahead.  Any
>>>>>> objections?
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> We can go back to SVN for any history that is missing.  I doubt we
>> would
>>>>>> need that because it was the early days of the  Installer project and
>> I
>>>>>> am
>>>>>> pretty sure that there is anything mission critical there.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>> Om
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> --------
>>>>>> David Nalley commented on INFRA-5549:
>>>>>> ------------------------------**-------
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Okay folks:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> I tried running through utilities 2 more times - came up with the same
>>>>>> result.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Here's the issue - because there are differences in how git and svn
>>>>>> handle
>>>>>> branches and tags, when we look to convert a SVN tree we have to
>> specify
>>>>>> a
>>>>>> layout. (e.g. where tags, branches and trunk, live in the tree)
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> The problem is that on August 15 the tree layout was changed [1],
>> which
>>>>>> is
>>>>>> the expected layout - so prior to that layout existing, in the eyes of
>>>>>> the
>>>>>> migration process nothing existed in that repo. In short - that layout
>>>>>> change essentially (from a git perspective.) restarted history.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> (BTW - Paul Davis provided the sanity to catch this problem, many
>> thanks
>>>>>> for that.)
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Let me know how you want to proceed with this.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> [1] http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?**view=revision&revision=1373617<
>> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1373617>
>>>>>> --------
>>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> --
>>>>> Alex Harui
>>>>> Flex SDK Team
>>>>> Adobe Systems, Inc.
>>>>> http://blogs.adobe.com/aharui
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> --
>>>> Ix Multimedia Software
>>>> 
>>>> Jan Luykenstraat 27
>>>> 3521 VB Utrecht
>>>> 
>>>> T. 06-51952295
>>>> I. www.ixsoftware.nl
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> --
>>> Carlos Rovira
>>> Director de Tecnología
>>> M: +34 607 22 60 05
>>> F:  +34 912 94 80 80
>>> http://www.codeoscopic.com
>>> http://www.directwriter.es
>>> http://www.avant2.es
>> 
>> 

-- 
Alex Harui
Flex SDK Team
Adobe Systems, Inc.
http://blogs.adobe.com/aharui