[DISCUSS][PMC] Proposed Initial PMC List and process

["Dennis E. Hamilton" <or...@apache.org>]

My recommendation:

48-hour steps are too short.  Take at least 72 minimums, state fixed UTC earliest-end date-times (so no one has to figure out when "from now" is), and maybe skip over weekend days.

There's no rush.

 - Dennis

-----Original Message-----
From: Andrew Rist [mailto:andrew.rist@oracle.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2012 11:36
To: ooo-dev
Subject: [PMC] Proposed Initial PMC List and process

[ ... ]

Proposed Process:

  * 48 hour window to build consensus on this process moving forward
    (Tues-Wed)
  * 48 hour (+48 hour weekend) discussion period (Thurs-Fri + Sat Sun) -
    stabilization of the finalized Initial PMC List
  * 72 hour vote on the resulting list as the initial PMC list (ending
    next Wed.)

[ ... ]

Re: [DISCUSS][PMC] Proposed Initial PMC List and process

[Peter Junge <pe...@gmx.org>]

On 9/26/2012 3:20 AM, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
> My recommendation:
>
> 48-hour steps are too short.  Take at least 72 minimums, state fixed UTC earliest-end date-times (so no one has to figure out when "from now" is), and maybe skip over weekend days.
>
> There's no rush.

+1


>
>   - Dennis
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Andrew Rist [mailto:andrew.rist@oracle.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2012 11:36
> To: ooo-dev
> Subject: [PMC] Proposed Initial PMC List and process
>
> [ ... ]
>
> Proposed Process:
>
>    * 48 hour window to build consensus on this process moving forward
>      (Tues-Wed)
>    * 48 hour (+48 hour weekend) discussion period (Thurs-Fri + Sat Sun) -
>      stabilization of the finalized Initial PMC List
>    * 72 hour vote on the resulting list as the initial PMC list (ending
>      next Wed.)
>
> [ ... ]
>
>