You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@tuscany.apache.org by Luciano Resende <lu...@gmail.com> on 2006/08/15 16:51:52 UTC
POM question : groupId and artifactId guidelines ?
I was working on DAS distribution and notices various components use various
"standards" for groupId and artifactId (e.g DAS use different grouping the
SDO, etc)
I was just wondering if we have any guidelines on how to group sub-projects
by groupId and artifcatId in POM files ?
--
-----------------------------------------------------
Luciano Resende
SOA Opensource - Apache Tuscany
-----------------------------------------------------
Re: POM question : groupId and artifactId guidelines ?
Posted by Luciano Resende <lu...@gmail.com>.
Yes, my suggestion was going to be to the SDO groupId to be changed to "
org.apache.tuscany.sdo"... but i don't think it's a big deal, I was just
curious if there was any guidelines or not...
On 8/15/06, Jeremy Boynes <jb...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> On Aug 15, 2006, at 7:51 AM, Luciano Resende wrote:
>
> > I was working on DAS distribution and notices various components
> > use various
> > "standards" for groupId and artifactId (e.g DAS use different
> > grouping the
> > SDO, etc)
> >
> > I was just wondering if we have any guidelines on how to group sub-
> > projects
> > by groupId and artifcatId in POM files ?
>
> DAS is currently using its own groupId "org.apache.tuscany.das" -
> this seems reasonable, were you thinking of changing it? I would
> instead suggest changing SDO to "org.apache.tuscany.sdo" would be
> better.
>
> --
> Jeremy
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: tuscany-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: tuscany-dev-help@ws.apache.org
>
>
--
-----------------------------------------------------
Luciano Resende
SOA Opensource - Apache Tuscany
-----------------------------------------------------
Re: POM question : groupId and artifactId guidelines ?
Posted by Jeremy Boynes <jb...@apache.org>.
On Aug 15, 2006, at 7:51 AM, Luciano Resende wrote:
> I was working on DAS distribution and notices various components
> use various
> "standards" for groupId and artifactId (e.g DAS use different
> grouping the
> SDO, etc)
>
> I was just wondering if we have any guidelines on how to group sub-
> projects
> by groupId and artifcatId in POM files ?
DAS is currently using its own groupId "org.apache.tuscany.das" -
this seems reasonable, were you thinking of changing it? I would
instead suggest changing SDO to "org.apache.tuscany.sdo" would be
better.
--
Jeremy
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: tuscany-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: tuscany-dev-help@ws.apache.org