You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@hbase.apache.org by "chenglei (Jira)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2022/07/24 07:10:00 UTC
[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-27230) RegionServer should be aborted when WAL.sync throws TimeoutIOException
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-27230?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17570421#comment-17570421 ]
chenglei commented on HBASE-27230:
----------------------------------
Pushed to master, thanks [~zhangduo] for help and review.
> RegionServer should be aborted when WAL.sync throws TimeoutIOException
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-27230
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-27230
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: wal
> Affects Versions: 3.0.0-alpha-4
> Reporter: chenglei
> Assignee: chenglei
> Priority: Major
>
> As HBASE-27223 said, if {{WAL.sync}} get a timeout exception, we should abort the region server, as the design of WAL sync, is to succeed or die, there is no 'failure'. It is usually not a big deal is because we set a very large default value(5 minutes) for {{AbstractFSWAL.WAL_SYNC_TIMEOUT_MS}}, usually the WAL system will abort the region server if it can not finish the sync within 5 minutes.
> In the PR, only the {{WAL.sync}} timeout in {{HRegion#doWALAppend}} ,regionServer is always aborted. For {{WALUtil.writeMarker}}, it is just record the internal state and seems it is no need to always abort the regionServer when {{WAL.sync}} timeout,it is the internal state transition that determines whether regionServer is aborted.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)