Backporting HBASE-2937 to 0.90.x as part of HBASE-4462

[Ramkrishna S Vasudevan <ra...@huawei.com>]

Hi All

 

As part of HBASE-4462 I would like to know if we can backport HBASE-2937?

Once i get the confirmation i will submit a patch after backporting and
testing.

 

Regards

Ram

 

 

Re: Backporting HBASE-2937 to 0.90.x as part of HBASE-4462

[Todd Lipcon <to...@cloudera.com>]

Makes me nervous. i'm not -1, but the more features we backport to
0.90, the less I will trust the next release off the branch.

-Todd

On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 5:15 AM, Ted Yu <yu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> If someone has validated HBASE-2937 by deploying HBase 0.92 and using HTable
> operations, please share.
>
> Backporting HBASE-2937 increases the amount of testing.
>
> Cheers
>
> On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 12:12 AM, Ramkrishna S Vasudevan <
> ramakrishnas@huawei.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi All
>>
>>
>>
>> As part of HBASE-4462 I would like to know if we can backport HBASE-2937?
>>
>> Once i get the confirmation i will submit a patch after backporting and
>> testing.
>>
>>
>>
>> Regards
>>
>> Ram
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>



-- 
Todd Lipcon
Software Engineer, Cloudera

Re: Backporting HBASE-2937 to 0.90.x as part of HBASE-4462

[Andrew Purtell <ap...@apache.org>]

I backported 2937 into our internal 90-ish tree as the next candidate for deployment, for reasons discussed on the jira. I realize this is not the same thing, but should be able to tell you the result of full system end to end tests soon.

Best regards,


   - Andy

Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein (via Tom White)


>________________________________
>From: Ted Yu <yu...@gmail.com>
>To: dev@hbase.apache.org; ramakrishnas@huawei.com
>Sent: Monday, October 3, 2011 5:15 AM
>Subject: Re: Backporting HBASE-2937 to 0.90.x as part of HBASE-4462
>
>If someone has validated HBASE-2937 by deploying HBase 0.92 and using HTable
>operations, please share.
>
>Backporting HBASE-2937 increases the amount of testing.
>
>Cheers
>
>On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 12:12 AM, Ramkrishna S Vasudevan <
>ramakrishnas@huawei.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi All
>>
>>
>>
>> As part of HBASE-4462 I would like to know if we can backport HBASE-2937?
>>
>> Once i get the confirmation i will submit a patch after backporting and
>> testing.
>>
>>
>>
>> Regards
>>
>> Ram
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>

Re: Backporting HBASE-2937 to 0.90.x as part of HBASE-4462

[Ted Yu <yu...@gmail.com>]

If someone has validated HBASE-2937 by deploying HBase 0.92 and using HTable
operations, please share.

Backporting HBASE-2937 increases the amount of testing.

Cheers

On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 12:12 AM, Ramkrishna S Vasudevan <
ramakrishnas@huawei.com> wrote:

> Hi All
>
>
>
> As part of HBASE-4462 I would like to know if we can backport HBASE-2937?
>
> Once i get the confirmation i will submit a patch after backporting and
> testing.
>
>
>
> Regards
>
> Ram
>
>
>
>
>
>

Re: Backporting HBASE-2937 to 0.90.x as part of HBASE-4462

[Shrijeet Paliwal <sh...@rocketfuel.com>]

If HBASE-2937 is backported, this
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-4003 will need to be backported
as well, I think.

-Shrijeet

On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 9:56 AM, Jean-Daniel Cryans <jd...@apache.org>wrote:

> I'm usually against backporting features, but that patch looks
> harmless. The only thing I'm not sure from reading the code is if it
> changes the default behavior, so if someone already configured
> different retries from the default ones that it won't screw them up.
>
> J-D
>
> On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 12:12 AM, Ramkrishna S Vasudevan
> <ra...@huawei.com> wrote:
> > Hi All
> >
> >
> >
> > As part of HBASE-4462 I would like to know if we can backport HBASE-2937?
> >
> > Once i get the confirmation i will submit a patch after backporting and
> > testing.
> >
> >
> >
> > Regards
> >
> > Ram
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>

Re: Backporting HBASE-2937 to 0.90.x as part of HBASE-4462

[Jean-Daniel Cryans <jd...@apache.org>]

I'm usually against backporting features, but that patch looks
harmless. The only thing I'm not sure from reading the code is if it
changes the default behavior, so if someone already configured
different retries from the default ones that it won't screw them up.

J-D

On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 12:12 AM, Ramkrishna S Vasudevan
<ra...@huawei.com> wrote:
> Hi All
>
>
>
> As part of HBASE-4462 I would like to know if we can backport HBASE-2937?
>
> Once i get the confirmation i will submit a patch after backporting and
> testing.
>
>
>
> Regards
>
> Ram
>
>
>
>
>
>