problem

[Vano Beridze <va...@silkroad.ge>]

Hello

I filed my first bug against tomcat yesterday

http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27091

Person whos email address is remm@apache.org

closed this bug as wontfix.
As you see I reopened the bug because I've my arguments.

After that that person closed this bug as wontfix 
event not explainig why.

My question is:

If this is the opensource project why that person behaves so.
I'm not so dumb to insist on something without a reason.
I have my arguments regarding this bug. If he does not agree then explain.

I think I am part of the community and the community is developing a product.
If it's not so then tell me.

Comment are welcome
Thank you

Vano Beridze
Devoted tomcat user.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: tomcat-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: tomcat-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org

Re: problem

[Remy Maucherat <re...@apache.org>]

Paul Speed wrote:
> Vano Beridze wrote:
> 
>> If it would be a critical problem for me I would propose :)
>>
>> I was just impressed by so aggresive behaviour. Tomcat list was always 
>> friendly to me.
> 
> Don't see it as aggressive behavior.  See at as someone who tries to
> keep the bug database trimmed to only those things that someone cares
> enough about to implement.  It doesn't really serve any purpose if it's
> filled with 500 enhancements that noone wants to implement.

I try to keep it the enhancements I find useful in BZ. As for the 
others, when there's no patch, then it's "forget about it" generally, so 
it's closed.

Rémy


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: tomcat-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: tomcat-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org

Re: problem

[Paul Speed <ps...@progeeks.com>]

Vano Beridze wrote:

> jean-frederic clere wrote:
> 
>> +++
>> ------- Additional Comments From Remy Maucherat 2004-02-19 19:44 -------
>>
>> Yes, but not doing so is too complex to implement overall (since you 
>> would have
>> to parse the descriptor to know what to do).
>> +++
>> For me that is a good explaination as severity of the bug is enhancement.
>>
> Have you read the comment next to that message?
> I'm saying that it's not necessary to parse the descriptor.
> If I'm wrong then tell me instead of closing the bug as wontfix again.
> 
>> Then propose a patch for your problem I will aply it :-)
>>  
>>
> If it would be a critical problem for me I would propose :)
> 
> I was just impressed by so aggresive behaviour. Tomcat list was always 
> friendly to me.

Don't see it as aggressive behavior.  See at as someone who tries to
keep the bug database trimmed to only those things that someone cares
enough about to implement.  It doesn't really serve any purpose if it's
filled with 500 enhancements that noone wants to implement.

Just a lurker's opinion,
-Paul




---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: tomcat-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: tomcat-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org

Re: problem

[Vano Beridze <va...@silkroad.ge>]

jean-frederic clere wrote:

>+++
>------- Additional Comments From Remy Maucherat 2004-02-19 19:44 -------
>
>Yes, but not doing so is too complex to implement overall (since you would have
>to parse the descriptor to know what to do).
>+++
>For me that is a good explaination as severity of the bug is enhancement.
>
Have you read the comment next to that message?
I'm saying that it's not necessary to parse the descriptor.
If I'm wrong then tell me instead of closing the bug as wontfix again.

>Then propose a patch for your problem I will aply it :-)
>  
>
If it would be a critical problem for me I would propose :)

I was just impressed by so aggresive behaviour. Tomcat list was always 
friendly to me.

Thanks again
Vano


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: tomcat-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: tomcat-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org

Re: problem

[jean-frederic clere <jf...@fujitsu-siemens.com>]

Vano Beridze wrote:
> Hello
> 
> I filed my first bug against tomcat yesterday
> 
> http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27091
> 
> Person whos email address is remm@apache.org
> 
> closed this bug as wontfix.
> As you see I reopened the bug because I've my arguments.
> 
> After that that person closed this bug as wontfix event not explainig why.

+++
------- Additional Comments From Remy Maucherat 2004-02-19 19:44 -------

Yes, but not doing so is too complex to implement overall (since you would have
to parse the descriptor to know what to do).
+++
For me that is a good explaination as severity of the bug is enhancement.

> 
> My question is:
> 
> If this is the opensource project why that person behaves so.
> I'm not so dumb to insist on something without a reason.
> I have my arguments regarding this bug. If he does not agree then explain.
> 
> I think I am part of the community and the community is developing a
> product.

Then propose a patch for your problem I will aply it :-)

> If it's not so then tell me.
> 
> Comment are welcome
> Thank you
> 
> Vano Beridze
> Devoted tomcat user.
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: tomcat-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: tomcat-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
> 
>