You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@geronimo.apache.org by Matt Hogstrom <ma...@hogstrom.org> on 2006/12/18 16:37:41 UTC
[DISCUSS] 2.0-M1 Release
All,
I opened this thread for general comments and questions about the
release. Let's have the discussions here and leave the vote thread
for +/- voting only so it will be easier to process
Thanks.
Matt Hogstrom
matt@hogstrom.org
Re: [DISCUSS] 2.0-M1 Release
Posted by Matt Hogstrom <ma...@hogstrom.org>.
Thanks for finding this Kevan.
I reposted the source, there are no modules.
Updated source is in:
http://people.apache.org/~hogstrom/2.0-M1/
Thanks for finding this.
On Dec 18, 2006, at 12:36 PM, Kevan Miller wrote:
>
> On Dec 18, 2006, at 10:46 AM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
>
>> On Dec 18, 2006, at 9:49 AM, Kevan Miller wrote:
>>>
>>> There's a source file missing a license header. Not sure if it
>>> was added after my last scan of the code or if I just missed it.
>>> Anyway, it needs to be fixed.
>>>
>>> All servers start. I'm getting some [info] log messages sent to
>>> STDOUT, but I don't think that should hold up an M1 release.
>>>
>>> I've scanned the jetty java ee5 binary -- looks good. Working on
>>> tomcat and some more sanity checks. Other that the license
>>> header, things look good...
>>>
>>> --kevan
>>
>> Kevan,
>>
>> If you'll add it to tags I'll re-spin that module. This doesn't
>> affect the server binaries so updating and spinning that module
>> should be fine.
>>
>> I'd say thanks for finding this but I now officially hate your
>> keen eye :)
>>
>> On the positive note...we are doing way better than we ever have
>> previously in terms of legal clearance so thanks to you and all
>> the others making this easier. I think Jason's legal plugin plus
>> the RAT tool, plus all the paranoid eyes are helping :)
>
> Ok. Fixed with 488326.
>
> --kevan
>
Matt Hogstrom
matt@hogstrom.org
Re: [DISCUSS] 2.0-M1 Release
Posted by Kevan Miller <ke...@gmail.com>.
On Dec 18, 2006, at 10:46 AM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
> On Dec 18, 2006, at 9:49 AM, Kevan Miller wrote:
>>
>> There's a source file missing a license header. Not sure if it was
>> added after my last scan of the code or if I just missed it.
>> Anyway, it needs to be fixed.
>>
>> All servers start. I'm getting some [info] log messages sent to
>> STDOUT, but I don't think that should hold up an M1 release.
>>
>> I've scanned the jetty java ee5 binary -- looks good. Working on
>> tomcat and some more sanity checks. Other that the license header,
>> things look good...
>>
>> --kevan
>
> Kevan,
>
> If you'll add it to tags I'll re-spin that module. This doesn't
> affect the server binaries so updating and spinning that module
> should be fine.
>
> I'd say thanks for finding this but I now officially hate your keen
> eye :)
>
> On the positive note...we are doing way better than we ever have
> previously in terms of legal clearance so thanks to you and all the
> others making this easier. I think Jason's legal plugin plus the
> RAT tool, plus all the paranoid eyes are helping :)
Ok. Fixed with 488326.
--kevan
Re: [DISCUSS] 2.0-M1 Release
Posted by Matt Hogstrom <ma...@hogstrom.org>.
On Dec 18, 2006, at 9:49 AM, Kevan Miller wrote:
>
> There's a source file missing a license header. Not sure if it was
> added after my last scan of the code or if I just missed it.
> Anyway, it needs to be fixed.
>
> All servers start. I'm getting some [info] log messages sent to
> STDOUT, but I don't think that should hold up an M1 release.
>
> I've scanned the jetty java ee5 binary -- looks good. Working on
> tomcat and some more sanity checks. Other that the license header,
> things look good...
>
> --kevan
Kevan,
If you'll add it to tags I'll re-spin that module. This doesn't
affect the server binaries so updating and spinning that module
should be fine.
I'd say thanks for finding this but I now officially hate your keen
eye :)
On the positive note...we are doing way better than we ever have
previously in terms of legal clearance so thanks to you and all the
others making this easier. I think Jason's legal plugin plus the RAT
tool, plus all the paranoid eyes are helping :)
Re: [DISCUSS] 2.0-M1 Release
Posted by Matt Hogstrom <ma...@hogstrom.org>.
I think its a preference. At this point I think M1 is what it is and
we'll update the Wiki with known issues.
On Dec 18, 2006, at 12:49 PM, anita kulshreshtha wrote:
> Matt,
> I had to change the following lines in server-log4j.properties to
> get system information logged:
> log4j.rootLogger=INFO, CONSOLE, FILE
> log4j.appender.FILE.Threshold=INFO
> In addition I see the following stack trace during shutdown. A fix
> for this is already available in rev 488106:
> http://www.nabble.com/Re%3A-svn-commit%3A-r488106----geronimo-
> server-trunk-modules-geronimo-naming-src-main-java-org-apache-
> geronimo-gjndi-binding-GBeanBinding.java-p7930963.html
> Is it a good idea to supress all warning messages like this even
> for
> a M1 release ?
>
> Thanks
> Anita
>
> 12:39:24,552 WARN [BasicLifecycleMonitor] Exception occured while
> notifying listener
> java.lang.NullPointerException
> at
> org.apache.geronimo.gjndi.binding.GBeanBinding.removeBinding
> (GBeanBinding.java:159)
> at
> org.apache.geronimo.gjndi.binding.GBeanBinding
> $GBeanLifecycleListener.stopped(GBeanBinding.java:108)
> at
> org.apache.geronimo.kernel.basic.BasicLifecycleMonitor.fireStoppedEven
> t(BasicLifecycleMonitor.java:197)
> at
> org.apache.geronimo.kernel.basic.BasicLifecycleMonitor.access$500
> (BasicLifecycleMonitor.java:41)
> at
> ...................................................................
>
> --- Matt Hogstrom <ma...@hogstrom.org> wrote:
>
>> anita,
>>
>> If I turn logging up to INFO in var/log/server-log4j.properties I get
>>
>> information in the log.
>>
>> On Dec 18, 2006, at 10:37 AM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
>>
>>> All,
>>>
>>> I opened this thread for general comments and questions about the
>>> release. Let's have the discussions here and leave the vote thread
>>
>>> for +/- voting only so it will be easier to process
>>>
>>> Thanks.
>>>
>>> Matt Hogstrom
>>> matt@hogstrom.org
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>> Matt Hogstrom
>> matt@hogstrom.org
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
> http://mail.yahoo.com
>
Matt Hogstrom
matt@hogstrom.org
Re: [DISCUSS] 2.0-M1 Release
Posted by anita kulshreshtha <a_...@yahoo.com>.
Matt,
I had to change the following lines in server-log4j.properties to
get system information logged:
log4j.rootLogger=INFO, CONSOLE, FILE
log4j.appender.FILE.Threshold=INFO
In addition I see the following stack trace during shutdown. A fix
for this is already available in rev 488106:
http://www.nabble.com/Re%3A-svn-commit%3A-r488106----geronimo-server-trunk-modules-geronimo-naming-src-main-java-org-apache-geronimo-gjndi-binding-GBeanBinding.java-p7930963.html
Is it a good idea to supress all warning messages like this even for
a M1 release ?
Thanks
Anita
12:39:24,552 WARN [BasicLifecycleMonitor] Exception occured while
notifying listener
java.lang.NullPointerException
at
org.apache.geronimo.gjndi.binding.GBeanBinding.removeBinding(GBeanBinding.java:159)
at
org.apache.geronimo.gjndi.binding.GBeanBinding$GBeanLifecycleListener.stopped(GBeanBinding.java:108)
at
org.apache.geronimo.kernel.basic.BasicLifecycleMonitor.fireStoppedEvent(BasicLifecycleMonitor.java:197)
at
org.apache.geronimo.kernel.basic.BasicLifecycleMonitor.access$500(BasicLifecycleMonitor.java:41)
at
...................................................................
--- Matt Hogstrom <ma...@hogstrom.org> wrote:
> anita,
>
> If I turn logging up to INFO in var/log/server-log4j.properties I get
>
> information in the log.
>
> On Dec 18, 2006, at 10:37 AM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
>
> > All,
> >
> > I opened this thread for general comments and questions about the
> > release. Let's have the discussions here and leave the vote thread
>
> > for +/- voting only so it will be easier to process
> >
> > Thanks.
> >
> > Matt Hogstrom
> > matt@hogstrom.org
> >
> >
> >
>
> Matt Hogstrom
> matt@hogstrom.org
>
>
>
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
Re: [DISCUSS] 2.0-M1 Release
Posted by Matt Hogstrom <ma...@hogstrom.org>.
anita,
If I turn logging up to INFO in var/log/server-log4j.properties I get
information in the log.
On Dec 18, 2006, at 10:37 AM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
> All,
>
> I opened this thread for general comments and questions about the
> release. Let's have the discussions here and leave the vote thread
> for +/- voting only so it will be easier to process
>
> Thanks.
>
> Matt Hogstrom
> matt@hogstrom.org
>
>
>
Matt Hogstrom
matt@hogstrom.org
Re: [DISCUSS] 2.0-M1 Release
Posted by Hernan Cunico <hc...@gmail.com>.
Rerouting to this thread from "[VOTE] 2.0-M1 Release"
Hi All,
I have two basic comments/questions.
1- I see a bunch of INFO messages in both Tomcat and Jetty at startup, not a show stopper for this release.
2- Deployment on Jetty is not behaving exactly as I expected. Not sure if I messed up the deployment plans given the new specs, however this same WAR works just fine with Tomcat.
In Jetty I deploy a WAR and when I access the application it will list the content of the WAR, if I click on the JSP it will work fine. Something like not following the web.xml <welcome-file> maybe? The context-root however is correct.
Just in case you may ask, here are the deployment plans:
geronimo-web.xml
==================================================================
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<web-app xmlns="http://geronimo.apache.org/xml/ns/j2ee/web-1.2">
<environment>
<moduleId>
<groupId>sample.applications</groupId>
<artifactId>HelloWorldApp</artifactId>
<version>2.0</version>
<type>war</type>
</moduleId>
</environment>
<context-root>/hello</context-root>
</web-app>
==================================================================
web.xml
==================================================================
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<web-app version="2.4"
xmlns="http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/j2ee"
xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
xsi:schemaLocation="http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/j2ee
http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/j2ee/web-app_2_4.xsd">
<welcome-file-list>
<welcome-file>HelloWorld.jsp</welcome-file>
</welcome-file-list>
</web-app>
==================================================================
Am I missing anything obvious?
Cheers!
Hernan
Matt Hogstrom wrote:
> All,
>
> I opened this thread for general comments and questions about the
> release. Let's have the discussions here and leave the vote thread for
> +/- voting only so it will be easier to process
>
> Thanks.
>
> Matt Hogstrom
> matt@hogstrom.org
>
>
>