You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to reviews@mesos.apache.org by Adam B <ad...@mesosphere.io> on 2016/02/09 07:39:03 UTC
Re: Review Request 42689: Clarified a comment that occurs in several
test cases.
-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/42689/#review118360
-----------------------------------------------------------
Looks good, but the patch doesn't apply cleanly anymore with `apply-reviews.py`. If you rebase it, I'll commit it.
- Adam B
On Jan. 23, 2016, 3:05 p.m., Neil Conway wrote:
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/42689/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
>
> (Updated Jan. 23, 2016, 3:05 p.m.)
>
>
> Review request for mesos and Adam B.
>
>
> Repository: mesos
>
>
> Description
> -------
>
> Clarified a comment that occurs in several test cases.
>
>
> Diffs
> -----
>
> src/tests/persistent_volume_tests.cpp 7acf7ab29d64d891f3288f8042d267dcc82a32e9
> src/tests/reservation_endpoints_tests.cpp 35c093567b07a11ca6eee85e2ff91894a460a7af
>
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/42689/diff/
>
>
> Testing
> -------
>
> Seems like these snuck in due to copy-and-pastes that were concurrent with the patch to fixup the rest of the instances of this comment.
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Neil Conway
>
>