You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@beam.apache.org by Aljoscha Krettek <al...@apache.org> on 2016/10/24 21:30:36 UTC
[VOTE] Release 0.3.0-incubating, release candidate #1
Hi Team!
Please review and vote at your leisure on release candidate #1 for version
0.3.0-incubating, as follows:
[ ] +1, Approve the release
[ ] -1, Do not approve the release (please provide specific comments)
The complete staging area is available for your review, which includes:
* JIRA release notes [1],
* the official Apache source release to be deployed to dist.apache.org [2],
* all artifacts to be deployed to the Maven Central Repository [3],
* source code tag "v0.3.0-incubating-RC1" [4],
* website pull request listing the release and publishing the API reference
manual [5].
Please keep in mind that this release is not focused on providing new
functionality. We want to refine the release process and make stable source
and binary artefacts available to our users.
The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. It is adopted by majority
approval, with at least 3 PPMC affirmative votes.
Cheers,
Aljoscha
[1]
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12319527&version=12338051
[2] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/beam/0.3.0-incubating/
[3]
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/staging/org/apache/beam/
[4]
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-beam.git;a=tag;h=5d86ff7f04862444c266142b0d5acecb5a6b7144
[5] https://github.com/apache/incubator-beam-site/pull/52
Re: [VOTE] Release 0.3.0-incubating, release candidate #1
Posted by Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb...@nanthrax.net>.
It's actually mentionned on the incubator thread usually.
Regards
JB
\u2063\u200b
On Oct 25, 2016, 09:46, at 09:46, "Isma�l Mej�a" <ie...@gmail.com> wrote:
>\u200b+1 (non-binding)
>
>- verified signatures + checksums
>- run mvn clean verify, all artifacts+tests run successfully
>
>One thing to add for future vote calls [idea copied from the latest
>flink
>vote ;)]:
>
>The release artifacts are signed with the key with fingerprint 121D7293
>https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/incubator/beam/KEYS
>\u200b
>
>
>On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 7:55 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofr� <jb...@nanthrax.net>
>wrote:
>
>> +1 (binding)
>>
>> I did a quick review and tests. It looks good to me.
>>
>> Regards
>> JB
>>
>> \u2063\u200b
>>
>> On Oct 24, 2016, 23:30, at 23:30, Aljoscha Krettek
><al...@apache.org>
>> wrote:
>> >Hi Team!
>> >
>> >Please review and vote at your leisure on release candidate #1 for
>> >version
>> >0.3.0-incubating, as follows:
>> >[ ] +1, Approve the release
>> >[ ] -1, Do not approve the release (please provide specific
>comments)
>> >
>> >The complete staging area is available for your review, which
>includes:
>> >* JIRA release notes [1],
>> >* the official Apache source release to be deployed to
>dist.apache.org
>> >[2],
>> >* all artifacts to be deployed to the Maven Central Repository [3],
>> >* source code tag "v0.3.0-incubating-RC1" [4],
>> >* website pull request listing the release and publishing the API
>> >reference
>> >manual [5].
>> >
>> >Please keep in mind that this release is not focused on providing
>new
>> >functionality. We want to refine the release process and make stable
>> >source
>> >and binary artefacts available to our users.
>> >
>> >The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. It is adopted by
>majority
>> >approval, with at least 3 PPMC affirmative votes.
>> >
>> >Cheers,
>> >Aljoscha
>> >
>> >[1]
>> >https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?
>> projectId=12319527&version=12338051
>> >[2]
>>
>>https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/beam/0.3.0-incubating/
>> >[3]
>> >https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/
>> staging/org/apache/beam/
>> >[4]
>>
>>https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-beam.git;a=tag;h=
>> 5d86ff7f04862444c266142b0d5acecb5a6b7144
>> >[5] https://github.com/apache/incubator-beam-site/pull/52
>>
Re: [VOTE] Release 0.3.0-incubating, release candidate #1
Posted by Ismaël Mejía <ie...@gmail.com>.
+1 (non-binding)
- verified signatures + checksums
- run mvn clean verify, all artifacts+tests run successfully
One thing to add for future vote calls [idea copied from the latest flink
vote ;)]:
The release artifacts are signed with the key with fingerprint 121D7293
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/incubator/beam/KEYS
On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 7:55 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb...@nanthrax.net>
wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> I did a quick review and tests. It looks good to me.
>
> Regards
> JB
>
>
>
> On Oct 24, 2016, 23:30, at 23:30, Aljoscha Krettek <al...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> >Hi Team!
> >
> >Please review and vote at your leisure on release candidate #1 for
> >version
> >0.3.0-incubating, as follows:
> >[ ] +1, Approve the release
> >[ ] -1, Do not approve the release (please provide specific comments)
> >
> >The complete staging area is available for your review, which includes:
> >* JIRA release notes [1],
> >* the official Apache source release to be deployed to dist.apache.org
> >[2],
> >* all artifacts to be deployed to the Maven Central Repository [3],
> >* source code tag "v0.3.0-incubating-RC1" [4],
> >* website pull request listing the release and publishing the API
> >reference
> >manual [5].
> >
> >Please keep in mind that this release is not focused on providing new
> >functionality. We want to refine the release process and make stable
> >source
> >and binary artefacts available to our users.
> >
> >The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. It is adopted by majority
> >approval, with at least 3 PPMC affirmative votes.
> >
> >Cheers,
> >Aljoscha
> >
> >[1]
> >https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?
> projectId=12319527&version=12338051
> >[2]
> >https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/beam/0.3.0-incubating/
> >[3]
> >https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/
> staging/org/apache/beam/
> >[4]
> >https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-beam.git;a=tag;h=
> 5d86ff7f04862444c266142b0d5acecb5a6b7144
> >[5] https://github.com/apache/incubator-beam-site/pull/52
>
Re: [VOTE] Release 0.3.0-incubating, release candidate #1
Posted by Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb...@nanthrax.net>.
+1 (binding)
I did a quick review and tests. It looks good to me.
Regards
JB
\u2063\u200b
On Oct 24, 2016, 23:30, at 23:30, Aljoscha Krettek <al...@apache.org> wrote:
>Hi Team!
>
>Please review and vote at your leisure on release candidate #1 for
>version
>0.3.0-incubating, as follows:
>[ ] +1, Approve the release
>[ ] -1, Do not approve the release (please provide specific comments)
>
>The complete staging area is available for your review, which includes:
>* JIRA release notes [1],
>* the official Apache source release to be deployed to dist.apache.org
>[2],
>* all artifacts to be deployed to the Maven Central Repository [3],
>* source code tag "v0.3.0-incubating-RC1" [4],
>* website pull request listing the release and publishing the API
>reference
>manual [5].
>
>Please keep in mind that this release is not focused on providing new
>functionality. We want to refine the release process and make stable
>source
>and binary artefacts available to our users.
>
>The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. It is adopted by majority
>approval, with at least 3 PPMC affirmative votes.
>
>Cheers,
>Aljoscha
>
>[1]
>https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12319527&version=12338051
>[2]
>https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/beam/0.3.0-incubating/
>[3]
>https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/staging/org/apache/beam/
>[4]
>https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-beam.git;a=tag;h=5d86ff7f04862444c266142b0d5acecb5a6b7144
>[5] https://github.com/apache/incubator-beam-site/pull/52
Re: [VOTE] Release 0.3.0-incubating, release candidate #1
Posted by Sergio Fernández <wi...@apache.org>.
Hi Aljoscha,
On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 12:06 PM, Aljoscha Krettek <al...@apache.org>
wrote:
>
> I used this line from the Apache release signing doc (
> https://www.apache.org/dev/release-signing.html#md5):
> $ gpg --print-md MD5 [fileName] > [fileName].md5
>
> What is normally used to checksum/verify the md5 and sha hash? As it is
> now, they can be manually verified by comparing the checksum in the file
> with one that was derived from the zip. I hope that's still ok for the
> release to go through?
>
Well, I think is just how the hash is formatted. Normally it's preferable
to have to the simple hash, as the maven-gpg-plugin generates (e.g.,
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/marmotta/3.3.0/apache-
marmotta-3.3.0-src.zip.md5). So you can easily automatically check (md5sum
-c foo.md5).
I've just outline a PR [1] to fix the issue [2], so we can discuss it over
the code.
Hope that helps.
Cheers,
[1] https://github.com/apache/incubator-beam/pull/1206
[2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-841
On Tue, 25 Oct 2016 at 11:53 Sergio Fernández <wi...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 11:36 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb...@nanthrax.net>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > By the way, your vote is not binding from a podling perspective (you
> are
> > > not PPMC). Your vote is binding from IPMC perspective (so when you will
> > > vote on the incubator mailing list).
> > >
> >
> > Well, PPMC are never binding votes, only IPMC are actually binding. That
> > I'm not part of the PPMC is not much relevant. Therefore I think my vote
> is
> > still a valid binding one; but I can vote again on general@incubator, no
> > problem.
> >
> > Sorry for jumping-in too early. Besides a IPMC, I'm also a developer
> > interested in Beam ;-)
> >
> > Cheers,
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > > On Oct 25, 2016, 11:33, at 11:33, "Sergio Fernández" <
> wikier@apache.org>
> > > wrote:
> > > >+1 (binding)
> > > >
> > > >So far I've successfully checked:
> > > >* signatures and digests
> > > >* source releases file layouts
> > > >* matched git tags and commit ids
> > > >* incubator suffix and disclaimer
> > > >* NOTICE and LICENSE files
> > > >* license headers
> > > >* clean build (Java 1.8.0_91, Scala, 2.11.7, SBT 0.13.9, Debian amd64)
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >Couple of minor issues I've seen it'd be great to have fixed in
> > > >upcoming
> > > >releases:
> > > >* MongoDbIOTest fails (addr already in use) when a Mongo service is
> > > >locally
> > > >running. I'd say the port should be random in the test suite.
> > > >* How did you generated the checksums? Because both SHA1/MD5 can't be
> > > >automatically checked because "no properly formatted SHA1/MD5 checksum
> > > >lines found".
> > > >
> > > >Great to see the project moving forward at this speed :-)
> > > >
> > > >Cheers,
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 11:30 PM, Aljoscha Krettek
> > > ><al...@apache.org>
> > > >wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> Hi Team!
> > > >>
> > > >> Please review and vote at your leisure on release candidate #1 for
> > > >version
> > > >> 0.3.0-incubating, as follows:
> > > >> [ ] +1, Approve the release
> > > >> [ ] -1, Do not approve the release (please provide specific
> comments)
> > > >>
> > > >> The complete staging area is available for your review, which
> > > >includes:
> > > >> * JIRA release notes [1],
> > > >> * the official Apache source release to be deployed to
> > > >dist.apache.org
> > > >> [2],
> > > >> * all artifacts to be deployed to the Maven Central Repository [3],
> > > >> * source code tag "v0.3.0-incubating-RC1" [4],
> > > >> * website pull request listing the release and publishing the API
> > > >reference
> > > >> manual [5].
> > > >>
> > > >> Please keep in mind that this release is not focused on providing
> new
> > > >> functionality. We want to refine the release process and make stable
> > > >source
> > > >> and binary artefacts available to our users.
> > > >>
> > > >> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. It is adopted by
> > > >majority
> > > >> approval, with at least 3 PPMC affirmative votes.
> > > >>
> > > >> Cheers,
> > > >> Aljoscha
> > > >>
> > > >> [1]
> > > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?
> > > >> projectId=12319527&version=12338051
> > > >> [2] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/beam/0.3.0-
> > > >> incubating/
> > > >> [3]
> > > >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/staging/
> > > >> org/apache/beam/
> > > >> [4]
> > > >> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-beam.git
> ;a=tag;h=
> > > >> 5d86ff7f04862444c266142b0d5acecb5a6b7144
> > > >> [5] https://github.com/apache/incubator-beam-site/pull/52
> > > >>
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >--
> > > >Sergio Fernández
> > > >Partner Technology Manager
> > > >Redlink GmbH
> > > >m: +43 6602747925 <+43%20660%202747925>
> > > >e: sergio.fernandez@redlink.co
> > > >w: http://redlink.co
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Sergio Fernández
> > Partner Technology Manager
> > Redlink GmbH
> > m: +43 6602747925 <+43%20660%202747925>
> > e: sergio.fernandez@redlink.co
> > w: http://redlink.co
> >
>
> --
> Sergio Fernández
> Partner Technology Manager
> Redlink GmbH
> m: +43 6602747925
> e: sergio.fernandez@redlink.co
> w: http://redlink.co
>
Re: [VOTE] Release 0.3.0-incubating, release candidate #1
Posted by Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb...@nanthrax.net>.
Imho it's better to use md5sun/sha1sum.
About mongodb I will implement a free port use to avoid the failing test if an existing instance is already running locally.
Regards
JB
\u2063\u200b
On Oct 25, 2016, 12:07, at 12:07, Aljoscha Krettek <al...@apache.org> wrote:
>Hi Sergio,
>I used this line from the Apache release signing doc (
>https://www.apache.org/dev/release-signing.html#md5):
>$ gpg --print-md MD5 [fileName] > [fileName].md5
>
>What is normally used to checksum/verify the md5 and sha hash? As it is
>now, they can be manually verified by comparing the checksum in the
>file
>with one that was derived from the zip. I hope that's still ok for the
>release to go through?
>
>Cheers,
>Aljoscha
>
>On Tue, 25 Oct 2016 at 11:53 Sergio Fern�ndez <wi...@apache.org>
>wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 11:36 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofr�
><jb...@nanthrax.net>
>> wrote:
>>
>> > By the way, your vote is not binding from a podling perspective
>(you are
>> > not PPMC). Your vote is binding from IPMC perspective (so when you
>will
>> > vote on the incubator mailing list).
>> >
>>
>> Well, PPMC are never binding votes, only IPMC are actually binding.
>That
>> I'm not part of the PPMC is not much relevant. Therefore I think my
>vote is
>> still a valid binding one; but I can vote again on general@incubator,
>no
>> problem.
>>
>> Sorry for jumping-in too early. Besides a IPMC, I'm also a developer
>> interested in Beam ;-)
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> > On Oct 25, 2016, 11:33, at 11:33, "Sergio Fern�ndez"
><wi...@apache.org>
>> > wrote:
>> > >+1 (binding)
>> > >
>> > >So far I've successfully checked:
>> > >* signatures and digests
>> > >* source releases file layouts
>> > >* matched git tags and commit ids
>> > >* incubator suffix and disclaimer
>> > >* NOTICE and LICENSE files
>> > >* license headers
>> > >* clean build (Java 1.8.0_91, Scala, 2.11.7, SBT 0.13.9, Debian
>amd64)
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >Couple of minor issues I've seen it'd be great to have fixed in
>> > >upcoming
>> > >releases:
>> > >* MongoDbIOTest fails (addr already in use) when a Mongo service
>is
>> > >locally
>> > >running. I'd say the port should be random in the test suite.
>> > >* How did you generated the checksums? Because both SHA1/MD5 can't
>be
>> > >automatically checked because "no properly formatted SHA1/MD5
>checksum
>> > >lines found".
>> > >
>> > >Great to see the project moving forward at this speed :-)
>> > >
>> > >Cheers,
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 11:30 PM, Aljoscha Krettek
>> > ><al...@apache.org>
>> > >wrote:
>> > >
>> > >> Hi Team!
>> > >>
>> > >> Please review and vote at your leisure on release candidate #1
>for
>> > >version
>> > >> 0.3.0-incubating, as follows:
>> > >> [ ] +1, Approve the release
>> > >> [ ] -1, Do not approve the release (please provide specific
>comments)
>> > >>
>> > >> The complete staging area is available for your review, which
>> > >includes:
>> > >> * JIRA release notes [1],
>> > >> * the official Apache source release to be deployed to
>> > >dist.apache.org
>> > >> [2],
>> > >> * all artifacts to be deployed to the Maven Central Repository
>[3],
>> > >> * source code tag "v0.3.0-incubating-RC1" [4],
>> > >> * website pull request listing the release and publishing the
>API
>> > >reference
>> > >> manual [5].
>> > >>
>> > >> Please keep in mind that this release is not focused on
>providing new
>> > >> functionality. We want to refine the release process and make
>stable
>> > >source
>> > >> and binary artefacts available to our users.
>> > >>
>> > >> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. It is adopted by
>> > >majority
>> > >> approval, with at least 3 PPMC affirmative votes.
>> > >>
>> > >> Cheers,
>> > >> Aljoscha
>> > >>
>> > >> [1]
>> > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?
>> > >> projectId=12319527&version=12338051
>> > >> [2] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/beam/0.3.0-
>> > >> incubating/
>> > >> [3]
>> > >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/staging/
>> > >> org/apache/beam/
>> > >> [4]
>> > >>
>https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-beam.git;a=tag;h=
>> > >> 5d86ff7f04862444c266142b0d5acecb5a6b7144
>> > >> [5] https://github.com/apache/incubator-beam-site/pull/52
>> > >>
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >--
>> > >Sergio Fern�ndez
>> > >Partner Technology Manager
>> > >Redlink GmbH
>> > >m: +43 6602747925 <+43%20660%202747925>
>> > >e: sergio.fernandez@redlink.co
>> > >w: http://redlink.co
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Sergio Fern�ndez
>> Partner Technology Manager
>> Redlink GmbH
>> m: +43 6602747925 <+43%20660%202747925>
>> e: sergio.fernandez@redlink.co
>> w: http://redlink.co
>>
Re: [VOTE] Release 0.3.0-incubating, release candidate #1
Posted by Aljoscha Krettek <al...@apache.org>.
Hi Sergio,
I used this line from the Apache release signing doc (
https://www.apache.org/dev/release-signing.html#md5):
$ gpg --print-md MD5 [fileName] > [fileName].md5
What is normally used to checksum/verify the md5 and sha hash? As it is
now, they can be manually verified by comparing the checksum in the file
with one that was derived from the zip. I hope that's still ok for the
release to go through?
Cheers,
Aljoscha
On Tue, 25 Oct 2016 at 11:53 Sergio Fernández <wi...@apache.org> wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 11:36 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb...@nanthrax.net>
> wrote:
>
> > By the way, your vote is not binding from a podling perspective (you are
> > not PPMC). Your vote is binding from IPMC perspective (so when you will
> > vote on the incubator mailing list).
> >
>
> Well, PPMC are never binding votes, only IPMC are actually binding. That
> I'm not part of the PPMC is not much relevant. Therefore I think my vote is
> still a valid binding one; but I can vote again on general@incubator, no
> problem.
>
> Sorry for jumping-in too early. Besides a IPMC, I'm also a developer
> interested in Beam ;-)
>
> Cheers,
>
>
>
>
> > On Oct 25, 2016, 11:33, at 11:33, "Sergio Fernández" <wi...@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> > >+1 (binding)
> > >
> > >So far I've successfully checked:
> > >* signatures and digests
> > >* source releases file layouts
> > >* matched git tags and commit ids
> > >* incubator suffix and disclaimer
> > >* NOTICE and LICENSE files
> > >* license headers
> > >* clean build (Java 1.8.0_91, Scala, 2.11.7, SBT 0.13.9, Debian amd64)
> > >
> > >
> > >Couple of minor issues I've seen it'd be great to have fixed in
> > >upcoming
> > >releases:
> > >* MongoDbIOTest fails (addr already in use) when a Mongo service is
> > >locally
> > >running. I'd say the port should be random in the test suite.
> > >* How did you generated the checksums? Because both SHA1/MD5 can't be
> > >automatically checked because "no properly formatted SHA1/MD5 checksum
> > >lines found".
> > >
> > >Great to see the project moving forward at this speed :-)
> > >
> > >Cheers,
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 11:30 PM, Aljoscha Krettek
> > ><al...@apache.org>
> > >wrote:
> > >
> > >> Hi Team!
> > >>
> > >> Please review and vote at your leisure on release candidate #1 for
> > >version
> > >> 0.3.0-incubating, as follows:
> > >> [ ] +1, Approve the release
> > >> [ ] -1, Do not approve the release (please provide specific comments)
> > >>
> > >> The complete staging area is available for your review, which
> > >includes:
> > >> * JIRA release notes [1],
> > >> * the official Apache source release to be deployed to
> > >dist.apache.org
> > >> [2],
> > >> * all artifacts to be deployed to the Maven Central Repository [3],
> > >> * source code tag "v0.3.0-incubating-RC1" [4],
> > >> * website pull request listing the release and publishing the API
> > >reference
> > >> manual [5].
> > >>
> > >> Please keep in mind that this release is not focused on providing new
> > >> functionality. We want to refine the release process and make stable
> > >source
> > >> and binary artefacts available to our users.
> > >>
> > >> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. It is adopted by
> > >majority
> > >> approval, with at least 3 PPMC affirmative votes.
> > >>
> > >> Cheers,
> > >> Aljoscha
> > >>
> > >> [1]
> > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?
> > >> projectId=12319527&version=12338051
> > >> [2] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/beam/0.3.0-
> > >> incubating/
> > >> [3]
> > >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/staging/
> > >> org/apache/beam/
> > >> [4]
> > >> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-beam.git;a=tag;h=
> > >> 5d86ff7f04862444c266142b0d5acecb5a6b7144
> > >> [5] https://github.com/apache/incubator-beam-site/pull/52
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >--
> > >Sergio Fernández
> > >Partner Technology Manager
> > >Redlink GmbH
> > >m: +43 6602747925 <+43%20660%202747925>
> > >e: sergio.fernandez@redlink.co
> > >w: http://redlink.co
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Sergio Fernández
> Partner Technology Manager
> Redlink GmbH
> m: +43 6602747925 <+43%20660%202747925>
> e: sergio.fernandez@redlink.co
> w: http://redlink.co
>
[RESULT] [VOTE] Release 0.3.0-incubating, release candidate #1
Posted by Aljoscha Krettek <al...@apache.org>.
I'm happy to announce that we have unanimously approved this release.
There are 10 approving votes 6 of which are binding:
* Jean-Baptiste (binding)
* Ismaël
* Sergio
* Seetharam
* Davor (binding)
* Dan (binding)
* Kenneth (binding)
* Maximilian (binding)
* Amit (binding)
* Neelesh
There are no disapproving votes.
As Sergio pointed out, the PPMC votes are not really binding while we are
still in incubator, only the IPMC votes will be. I'm nevertheless listing
them here as binding because we also did it on past votes.
I'll now go ahead and post this result to the IPMC for final voting.
Thanks everyone!
On Fri, 28 Oct 2016 at 09:09 Aljoscha Krettek <al...@apache.org> wrote:
> The voting time has elapsed. I'm hereby closing this vote and will tally
> the results in a separate thread.
>
> On Thu, 27 Oct 2016 at 17:38 Neelesh Salian <ns...@cloudera.com> wrote:
>
> +1 (non-binding)
> Thank you for putting this together
>
>
> On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 12:00 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb...@nanthrax.net>
> wrote:
>
> > No problem for the vote.
> >
> > For graduation, we are already thinking about it yes.
> >
> > Regards
> > JB
> >
> >
> >
> > On Oct 27, 2016, 08:54, at 08:54, "Sergio Fernández" <wi...@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> > >Hi JB,
> > >
> > >On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 12:00 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> > ><jb...@nanthrax.net>
> > >wrote:
> > >
> > >> Thanks Sergio ;)
> > >>
> > >
> > >You are welcome.
> > >
> > >
> > >> Just tried to explain to the others what is a binding vote ;)
> > >>
> > >
> > >It's a common mistake in many podlings that PPMC members thing they
> > >have
> > >binding votes over developers who are not part of the project. But
> > >during
> > >incubation only IPMC are binding votes. I hope that's clear.
> > >
> > >In theory it's simple. So sorry if I've made some noise with that. I'll
> > >repeat my vote later at general@incubator if you prefer it in that way.
> > >
> > >Cheers,
> > >
> > >P.S.: after 0.3.0-incubating, are you thinking about graduation? I
> > >think
> > >you should ;-)
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >On Oct 25, 2016, 11:53, at 11:53, "Sergio Fernández"
> > ><wi...@apache.org>
> > >> wrote:
> > >> >On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 11:36 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> > >> ><jb...@nanthrax.net>
> > >> >wrote:
> > >> >
> > >> >> By the way, your vote is not binding from a podling perspective
> > >(you
> > >> >are
> > >> >> not PPMC). Your vote is binding from IPMC perspective (so when you
> > >> >will
> > >> >> vote on the incubator mailing list).
> > >> >>
> > >> >
> > >> >Well, PPMC are never binding votes, only IPMC are actually binding.
> > >> >That
> > >> >I'm not part of the PPMC is not much relevant. Therefore I think my
> > >> >vote is
> > >> >still a valid binding one; but I can vote again on
> > >general@incubator,
> > >> >no
> > >> >problem.
> > >> >
> > >> >Sorry for jumping-in too early. Besides a IPMC, I'm also a developer
> > >> >interested in Beam ;-)
> > >> >
> > >> >Cheers,
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> >> On Oct 25, 2016, 11:33, at 11:33, "Sergio Fernández"
> > >> ><wi...@apache.org>
> > >> >> wrote:
> > >> >> >+1 (binding)
> > >> >> >
> > >> >> >So far I've successfully checked:
> > >> >> >* signatures and digests
> > >> >> >* source releases file layouts
> > >> >> >* matched git tags and commit ids
> > >> >> >* incubator suffix and disclaimer
> > >> >> >* NOTICE and LICENSE files
> > >> >> >* license headers
> > >> >> >* clean build (Java 1.8.0_91, Scala, 2.11.7, SBT 0.13.9, Debian
> > >> >amd64)
> > >> >> >
> > >> >> >
> > >> >> >Couple of minor issues I've seen it'd be great to have fixed in
> > >> >> >upcoming
> > >> >> >releases:
> > >> >> >* MongoDbIOTest fails (addr already in use) when a Mongo service
> > >is
> > >> >> >locally
> > >> >> >running. I'd say the port should be random in the test suite.
> > >> >> >* How did you generated the checksums? Because both SHA1/MD5
> > >can't
> > >> >be
> > >> >> >automatically checked because "no properly formatted SHA1/MD5
> > >> >checksum
> > >> >> >lines found".
> > >> >> >
> > >> >> >Great to see the project moving forward at this speed :-)
> > >> >> >
> > >> >> >Cheers,
> > >> >> >
> > >> >> >
> > >> >> >
> > >> >> >On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 11:30 PM, Aljoscha Krettek
> > >> >> ><al...@apache.org>
> > >> >> >wrote:
> > >> >> >
> > >> >> >> Hi Team!
> > >> >> >>
> > >> >> >> Please review and vote at your leisure on release candidate #1
> > >for
> > >> >> >version
> > >> >> >> 0.3.0-incubating, as follows:
> > >> >> >> [ ] +1, Approve the release
> > >> >> >> [ ] -1, Do not approve the release (please provide specific
> > >> >comments)
> > >> >> >>
> > >> >> >> The complete staging area is available for your review, which
> > >> >> >includes:
> > >> >> >> * JIRA release notes [1],
> > >> >> >> * the official Apache source release to be deployed to
> > >> >> >dist.apache.org
> > >> >> >> [2],
> > >> >> >> * all artifacts to be deployed to the Maven Central Repository
> > >> >[3],
> > >> >> >> * source code tag "v0.3.0-incubating-RC1" [4],
> > >> >> >> * website pull request listing the release and publishing the
> > >API
> > >> >> >reference
> > >> >> >> manual [5].
> > >> >> >>
> > >> >> >> Please keep in mind that this release is not focused on
> > >providing
> > >> >new
> > >> >> >> functionality. We want to refine the release process and make
> > >> >stable
> > >> >> >source
> > >> >> >> and binary artefacts available to our users.
> > >> >> >>
> > >> >> >> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. It is adopted by
> > >> >> >majority
> > >> >> >> approval, with at least 3 PPMC affirmative votes.
> > >> >> >>
> > >> >> >> Cheers,
> > >> >> >> Aljoscha
> > >> >> >>
> > >> >> >> [1]
> > >> >> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?
> > >> >> >> projectId=12319527&version=12338051
> > >> >> >> [2]
> > >https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/beam/0.3.0-
> > >> >> >> incubating/
> > >> >> >> [3]
> > >> >> >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/staging/
> > >> >> >> org/apache/beam/
> > >> >> >> [4]
> > >> >> >>
> > >>
> > >>https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-beam.git;a=tag;h=
> > >> >> >> 5d86ff7f04862444c266142b0d5acecb5a6b7144
> > >> >> >> [5] https://github.com/apache/incubator-beam-site/pull/52
> > >> >> >>
> > >> >> >
> > >> >> >
> > >> >> >
> > >> >> >--
> > >> >> >Sergio Fernández
> > >> >> >Partner Technology Manager
> > >> >> >Redlink GmbH
> > >> >> >m: +43 6602747925 <+43%20660%202747925>
> > >> >> >e: sergio.fernandez@redlink.co
> > >> >> >w: http://redlink.co
> > >> >>
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> >--
> > >> >Sergio Fernández
> > >> >Partner Technology Manager
> > >> >Redlink GmbH
> > >> >m: +43 6602747925 <+43%20660%202747925>
> > >> >e: sergio.fernandez@redlink.co
> > >> >w: http://redlink.co
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >--
> > >Sergio Fernández
> > >Partner Technology Manager
> > >Redlink GmbH
> > >m: +43 6602747925 <+43%20660%202747925>
> > >e: sergio.fernandez@redlink.co
> > >w: http://redlink.co
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Neelesh Srinivas Salian
> Customer Operations Engineer
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Release 0.3.0-incubating, release candidate #1
Posted by Aljoscha Krettek <al...@apache.org>.
The voting time has elapsed. I'm hereby closing this vote and will tally
the results in a separate thread.
On Thu, 27 Oct 2016 at 17:38 Neelesh Salian <ns...@cloudera.com> wrote:
> +1 (non-binding)
> Thank you for putting this together
>
>
> On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 12:00 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb...@nanthrax.net>
> wrote:
>
> > No problem for the vote.
> >
> > For graduation, we are already thinking about it yes.
> >
> > Regards
> > JB
> >
> >
> >
> > On Oct 27, 2016, 08:54, at 08:54, "Sergio Fernández" <wi...@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> > >Hi JB,
> > >
> > >On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 12:00 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> > ><jb...@nanthrax.net>
> > >wrote:
> > >
> > >> Thanks Sergio ;)
> > >>
> > >
> > >You are welcome.
> > >
> > >
> > >> Just tried to explain to the others what is a binding vote ;)
> > >>
> > >
> > >It's a common mistake in many podlings that PPMC members thing they
> > >have
> > >binding votes over developers who are not part of the project. But
> > >during
> > >incubation only IPMC are binding votes. I hope that's clear.
> > >
> > >In theory it's simple. So sorry if I've made some noise with that. I'll
> > >repeat my vote later at general@incubator if you prefer it in that way.
> > >
> > >Cheers,
> > >
> > >P.S.: after 0.3.0-incubating, are you thinking about graduation? I
> > >think
> > >you should ;-)
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >On Oct 25, 2016, 11:53, at 11:53, "Sergio Fernández"
> > ><wi...@apache.org>
> > >> wrote:
> > >> >On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 11:36 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> > >> ><jb...@nanthrax.net>
> > >> >wrote:
> > >> >
> > >> >> By the way, your vote is not binding from a podling perspective
> > >(you
> > >> >are
> > >> >> not PPMC). Your vote is binding from IPMC perspective (so when you
> > >> >will
> > >> >> vote on the incubator mailing list).
> > >> >>
> > >> >
> > >> >Well, PPMC are never binding votes, only IPMC are actually binding.
> > >> >That
> > >> >I'm not part of the PPMC is not much relevant. Therefore I think my
> > >> >vote is
> > >> >still a valid binding one; but I can vote again on
> > >general@incubator,
> > >> >no
> > >> >problem.
> > >> >
> > >> >Sorry for jumping-in too early. Besides a IPMC, I'm also a developer
> > >> >interested in Beam ;-)
> > >> >
> > >> >Cheers,
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> >> On Oct 25, 2016, 11:33, at 11:33, "Sergio Fernández"
> > >> ><wi...@apache.org>
> > >> >> wrote:
> > >> >> >+1 (binding)
> > >> >> >
> > >> >> >So far I've successfully checked:
> > >> >> >* signatures and digests
> > >> >> >* source releases file layouts
> > >> >> >* matched git tags and commit ids
> > >> >> >* incubator suffix and disclaimer
> > >> >> >* NOTICE and LICENSE files
> > >> >> >* license headers
> > >> >> >* clean build (Java 1.8.0_91, Scala, 2.11.7, SBT 0.13.9, Debian
> > >> >amd64)
> > >> >> >
> > >> >> >
> > >> >> >Couple of minor issues I've seen it'd be great to have fixed in
> > >> >> >upcoming
> > >> >> >releases:
> > >> >> >* MongoDbIOTest fails (addr already in use) when a Mongo service
> > >is
> > >> >> >locally
> > >> >> >running. I'd say the port should be random in the test suite.
> > >> >> >* How did you generated the checksums? Because both SHA1/MD5
> > >can't
> > >> >be
> > >> >> >automatically checked because "no properly formatted SHA1/MD5
> > >> >checksum
> > >> >> >lines found".
> > >> >> >
> > >> >> >Great to see the project moving forward at this speed :-)
> > >> >> >
> > >> >> >Cheers,
> > >> >> >
> > >> >> >
> > >> >> >
> > >> >> >On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 11:30 PM, Aljoscha Krettek
> > >> >> ><al...@apache.org>
> > >> >> >wrote:
> > >> >> >
> > >> >> >> Hi Team!
> > >> >> >>
> > >> >> >> Please review and vote at your leisure on release candidate #1
> > >for
> > >> >> >version
> > >> >> >> 0.3.0-incubating, as follows:
> > >> >> >> [ ] +1, Approve the release
> > >> >> >> [ ] -1, Do not approve the release (please provide specific
> > >> >comments)
> > >> >> >>
> > >> >> >> The complete staging area is available for your review, which
> > >> >> >includes:
> > >> >> >> * JIRA release notes [1],
> > >> >> >> * the official Apache source release to be deployed to
> > >> >> >dist.apache.org
> > >> >> >> [2],
> > >> >> >> * all artifacts to be deployed to the Maven Central Repository
> > >> >[3],
> > >> >> >> * source code tag "v0.3.0-incubating-RC1" [4],
> > >> >> >> * website pull request listing the release and publishing the
> > >API
> > >> >> >reference
> > >> >> >> manual [5].
> > >> >> >>
> > >> >> >> Please keep in mind that this release is not focused on
> > >providing
> > >> >new
> > >> >> >> functionality. We want to refine the release process and make
> > >> >stable
> > >> >> >source
> > >> >> >> and binary artefacts available to our users.
> > >> >> >>
> > >> >> >> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. It is adopted by
> > >> >> >majority
> > >> >> >> approval, with at least 3 PPMC affirmative votes.
> > >> >> >>
> > >> >> >> Cheers,
> > >> >> >> Aljoscha
> > >> >> >>
> > >> >> >> [1]
> > >> >> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?
> > >> >> >> projectId=12319527&version=12338051
> > >> >> >> [2]
> > >https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/beam/0.3.0-
> > >> >> >> incubating/
> > >> >> >> [3]
> > >> >> >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/staging/
> > >> >> >> org/apache/beam/
> > >> >> >> [4]
> > >> >> >>
> > >>
> > >>https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-beam.git;a=tag;h=
> > >> >> >> 5d86ff7f04862444c266142b0d5acecb5a6b7144
> > >> >> >> [5] https://github.com/apache/incubator-beam-site/pull/52
> > >> >> >>
> > >> >> >
> > >> >> >
> > >> >> >
> > >> >> >--
> > >> >> >Sergio Fernández
> > >> >> >Partner Technology Manager
> > >> >> >Redlink GmbH
> > >> >> >m: +43 6602747925 <+43%20660%202747925>
> > >> >> >e: sergio.fernandez@redlink.co
> > >> >> >w: http://redlink.co
> > >> >>
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> >--
> > >> >Sergio Fernández
> > >> >Partner Technology Manager
> > >> >Redlink GmbH
> > >> >m: +43 6602747925 <+43%20660%202747925>
> > >> >e: sergio.fernandez@redlink.co
> > >> >w: http://redlink.co
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >--
> > >Sergio Fernández
> > >Partner Technology Manager
> > >Redlink GmbH
> > >m: +43 6602747925 <+43%20660%202747925>
> > >e: sergio.fernandez@redlink.co
> > >w: http://redlink.co
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Neelesh Srinivas Salian
> Customer Operations Engineer
>
Re: [VOTE] Release 0.3.0-incubating, release candidate #1
Posted by Neelesh Salian <ns...@cloudera.com>.
+1 (non-binding)
Thank you for putting this together
On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 12:00 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb...@nanthrax.net>
wrote:
> No problem for the vote.
>
> For graduation, we are already thinking about it yes.
>
> Regards
> JB
>
>
>
> On Oct 27, 2016, 08:54, at 08:54, "Sergio Fernández" <wi...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> >Hi JB,
> >
> >On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 12:00 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> ><jb...@nanthrax.net>
> >wrote:
> >
> >> Thanks Sergio ;)
> >>
> >
> >You are welcome.
> >
> >
> >> Just tried to explain to the others what is a binding vote ;)
> >>
> >
> >It's a common mistake in many podlings that PPMC members thing they
> >have
> >binding votes over developers who are not part of the project. But
> >during
> >incubation only IPMC are binding votes. I hope that's clear.
> >
> >In theory it's simple. So sorry if I've made some noise with that. I'll
> >repeat my vote later at general@incubator if you prefer it in that way.
> >
> >Cheers,
> >
> >P.S.: after 0.3.0-incubating, are you thinking about graduation? I
> >think
> >you should ;-)
> >
> >
> >
> >On Oct 25, 2016, 11:53, at 11:53, "Sergio Fernández"
> ><wi...@apache.org>
> >> wrote:
> >> >On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 11:36 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> >> ><jb...@nanthrax.net>
> >> >wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> By the way, your vote is not binding from a podling perspective
> >(you
> >> >are
> >> >> not PPMC). Your vote is binding from IPMC perspective (so when you
> >> >will
> >> >> vote on the incubator mailing list).
> >> >>
> >> >
> >> >Well, PPMC are never binding votes, only IPMC are actually binding.
> >> >That
> >> >I'm not part of the PPMC is not much relevant. Therefore I think my
> >> >vote is
> >> >still a valid binding one; but I can vote again on
> >general@incubator,
> >> >no
> >> >problem.
> >> >
> >> >Sorry for jumping-in too early. Besides a IPMC, I'm also a developer
> >> >interested in Beam ;-)
> >> >
> >> >Cheers,
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >> On Oct 25, 2016, 11:33, at 11:33, "Sergio Fernández"
> >> ><wi...@apache.org>
> >> >> wrote:
> >> >> >+1 (binding)
> >> >> >
> >> >> >So far I've successfully checked:
> >> >> >* signatures and digests
> >> >> >* source releases file layouts
> >> >> >* matched git tags and commit ids
> >> >> >* incubator suffix and disclaimer
> >> >> >* NOTICE and LICENSE files
> >> >> >* license headers
> >> >> >* clean build (Java 1.8.0_91, Scala, 2.11.7, SBT 0.13.9, Debian
> >> >amd64)
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> >Couple of minor issues I've seen it'd be great to have fixed in
> >> >> >upcoming
> >> >> >releases:
> >> >> >* MongoDbIOTest fails (addr already in use) when a Mongo service
> >is
> >> >> >locally
> >> >> >running. I'd say the port should be random in the test suite.
> >> >> >* How did you generated the checksums? Because both SHA1/MD5
> >can't
> >> >be
> >> >> >automatically checked because "no properly formatted SHA1/MD5
> >> >checksum
> >> >> >lines found".
> >> >> >
> >> >> >Great to see the project moving forward at this speed :-)
> >> >> >
> >> >> >Cheers,
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> >On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 11:30 PM, Aljoscha Krettek
> >> >> ><al...@apache.org>
> >> >> >wrote:
> >> >> >
> >> >> >> Hi Team!
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> Please review and vote at your leisure on release candidate #1
> >for
> >> >> >version
> >> >> >> 0.3.0-incubating, as follows:
> >> >> >> [ ] +1, Approve the release
> >> >> >> [ ] -1, Do not approve the release (please provide specific
> >> >comments)
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> The complete staging area is available for your review, which
> >> >> >includes:
> >> >> >> * JIRA release notes [1],
> >> >> >> * the official Apache source release to be deployed to
> >> >> >dist.apache.org
> >> >> >> [2],
> >> >> >> * all artifacts to be deployed to the Maven Central Repository
> >> >[3],
> >> >> >> * source code tag "v0.3.0-incubating-RC1" [4],
> >> >> >> * website pull request listing the release and publishing the
> >API
> >> >> >reference
> >> >> >> manual [5].
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> Please keep in mind that this release is not focused on
> >providing
> >> >new
> >> >> >> functionality. We want to refine the release process and make
> >> >stable
> >> >> >source
> >> >> >> and binary artefacts available to our users.
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. It is adopted by
> >> >> >majority
> >> >> >> approval, with at least 3 PPMC affirmative votes.
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> Cheers,
> >> >> >> Aljoscha
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> [1]
> >> >> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?
> >> >> >> projectId=12319527&version=12338051
> >> >> >> [2]
> >https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/beam/0.3.0-
> >> >> >> incubating/
> >> >> >> [3]
> >> >> >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/staging/
> >> >> >> org/apache/beam/
> >> >> >> [4]
> >> >> >>
> >>
> >>https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-beam.git;a=tag;h=
> >> >> >> 5d86ff7f04862444c266142b0d5acecb5a6b7144
> >> >> >> [5] https://github.com/apache/incubator-beam-site/pull/52
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> >--
> >> >> >Sergio Fernández
> >> >> >Partner Technology Manager
> >> >> >Redlink GmbH
> >> >> >m: +43 6602747925
> >> >> >e: sergio.fernandez@redlink.co
> >> >> >w: http://redlink.co
> >> >>
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >--
> >> >Sergio Fernández
> >> >Partner Technology Manager
> >> >Redlink GmbH
> >> >m: +43 6602747925
> >> >e: sergio.fernandez@redlink.co
> >> >w: http://redlink.co
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> >--
> >Sergio Fernández
> >Partner Technology Manager
> >Redlink GmbH
> >m: +43 6602747925
> >e: sergio.fernandez@redlink.co
> >w: http://redlink.co
>
--
Neelesh Srinivas Salian
Customer Operations Engineer
Re: [VOTE] Release 0.3.0-incubating, release candidate #1
Posted by Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb...@nanthrax.net>.
No problem for the vote.
For graduation, we are already thinking about it yes.
Regards
JB
\u2063\u200b
On Oct 27, 2016, 08:54, at 08:54, "Sergio Fern�ndez" <wi...@apache.org> wrote:
>Hi JB,
>
>On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 12:00 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofr�
><jb...@nanthrax.net>
>wrote:
>
>> Thanks Sergio ;)
>>
>
>You are welcome.
>
>
>> Just tried to explain to the others what is a binding vote ;)
>>
>
>It's a common mistake in many podlings that PPMC members thing they
>have
>binding votes over developers who are not part of the project. But
>during
>incubation only IPMC are binding votes. I hope that's clear.
>
>In theory it's simple. So sorry if I've made some noise with that. I'll
>repeat my vote later at general@incubator if you prefer it in that way.
>
>Cheers,
>
>P.S.: after 0.3.0-incubating, are you thinking about graduation? I
>think
>you should ;-)
>
>
>
>On Oct 25, 2016, 11:53, at 11:53, "Sergio Fern�ndez"
><wi...@apache.org>
>> wrote:
>> >On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 11:36 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofr�
>> ><jb...@nanthrax.net>
>> >wrote:
>> >
>> >> By the way, your vote is not binding from a podling perspective
>(you
>> >are
>> >> not PPMC). Your vote is binding from IPMC perspective (so when you
>> >will
>> >> vote on the incubator mailing list).
>> >>
>> >
>> >Well, PPMC are never binding votes, only IPMC are actually binding.
>> >That
>> >I'm not part of the PPMC is not much relevant. Therefore I think my
>> >vote is
>> >still a valid binding one; but I can vote again on
>general@incubator,
>> >no
>> >problem.
>> >
>> >Sorry for jumping-in too early. Besides a IPMC, I'm also a developer
>> >interested in Beam ;-)
>> >
>> >Cheers,
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >> On Oct 25, 2016, 11:33, at 11:33, "Sergio Fern�ndez"
>> ><wi...@apache.org>
>> >> wrote:
>> >> >+1 (binding)
>> >> >
>> >> >So far I've successfully checked:
>> >> >* signatures and digests
>> >> >* source releases file layouts
>> >> >* matched git tags and commit ids
>> >> >* incubator suffix and disclaimer
>> >> >* NOTICE and LICENSE files
>> >> >* license headers
>> >> >* clean build (Java 1.8.0_91, Scala, 2.11.7, SBT 0.13.9, Debian
>> >amd64)
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >Couple of minor issues I've seen it'd be great to have fixed in
>> >> >upcoming
>> >> >releases:
>> >> >* MongoDbIOTest fails (addr already in use) when a Mongo service
>is
>> >> >locally
>> >> >running. I'd say the port should be random in the test suite.
>> >> >* How did you generated the checksums? Because both SHA1/MD5
>can't
>> >be
>> >> >automatically checked because "no properly formatted SHA1/MD5
>> >checksum
>> >> >lines found".
>> >> >
>> >> >Great to see the project moving forward at this speed :-)
>> >> >
>> >> >Cheers,
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 11:30 PM, Aljoscha Krettek
>> >> ><al...@apache.org>
>> >> >wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> >> Hi Team!
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Please review and vote at your leisure on release candidate #1
>for
>> >> >version
>> >> >> 0.3.0-incubating, as follows:
>> >> >> [ ] +1, Approve the release
>> >> >> [ ] -1, Do not approve the release (please provide specific
>> >comments)
>> >> >>
>> >> >> The complete staging area is available for your review, which
>> >> >includes:
>> >> >> * JIRA release notes [1],
>> >> >> * the official Apache source release to be deployed to
>> >> >dist.apache.org
>> >> >> [2],
>> >> >> * all artifacts to be deployed to the Maven Central Repository
>> >[3],
>> >> >> * source code tag "v0.3.0-incubating-RC1" [4],
>> >> >> * website pull request listing the release and publishing the
>API
>> >> >reference
>> >> >> manual [5].
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Please keep in mind that this release is not focused on
>providing
>> >new
>> >> >> functionality. We want to refine the release process and make
>> >stable
>> >> >source
>> >> >> and binary artefacts available to our users.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. It is adopted by
>> >> >majority
>> >> >> approval, with at least 3 PPMC affirmative votes.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Cheers,
>> >> >> Aljoscha
>> >> >>
>> >> >> [1]
>> >> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?
>> >> >> projectId=12319527&version=12338051
>> >> >> [2]
>https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/beam/0.3.0-
>> >> >> incubating/
>> >> >> [3]
>> >> >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/staging/
>> >> >> org/apache/beam/
>> >> >> [4]
>> >> >>
>>
>>https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-beam.git;a=tag;h=
>> >> >> 5d86ff7f04862444c266142b0d5acecb5a6b7144
>> >> >> [5] https://github.com/apache/incubator-beam-site/pull/52
>> >> >>
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >--
>> >> >Sergio Fern�ndez
>> >> >Partner Technology Manager
>> >> >Redlink GmbH
>> >> >m: +43 6602747925
>> >> >e: sergio.fernandez@redlink.co
>> >> >w: http://redlink.co
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >--
>> >Sergio Fern�ndez
>> >Partner Technology Manager
>> >Redlink GmbH
>> >m: +43 6602747925
>> >e: sergio.fernandez@redlink.co
>> >w: http://redlink.co
>>
>
>
>
>--
>Sergio Fern�ndez
>Partner Technology Manager
>Redlink GmbH
>m: +43 6602747925
>e: sergio.fernandez@redlink.co
>w: http://redlink.co
Re: [VOTE] Release 0.3.0-incubating, release candidate #1
Posted by Sergio Fernández <wi...@apache.org>.
Hi JB,
On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 12:00 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb...@nanthrax.net>
wrote:
> Thanks Sergio ;)
>
You are welcome.
> Just tried to explain to the others what is a binding vote ;)
>
It's a common mistake in many podlings that PPMC members thing they have
binding votes over developers who are not part of the project. But during
incubation only IPMC are binding votes. I hope that's clear.
In theory it's simple. So sorry if I've made some noise with that. I'll
repeat my vote later at general@incubator if you prefer it in that way.
Cheers,
P.S.: after 0.3.0-incubating, are you thinking about graduation? I think
you should ;-)
On Oct 25, 2016, 11:53, at 11:53, "Sergio Fernández" <wi...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> >On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 11:36 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> ><jb...@nanthrax.net>
> >wrote:
> >
> >> By the way, your vote is not binding from a podling perspective (you
> >are
> >> not PPMC). Your vote is binding from IPMC perspective (so when you
> >will
> >> vote on the incubator mailing list).
> >>
> >
> >Well, PPMC are never binding votes, only IPMC are actually binding.
> >That
> >I'm not part of the PPMC is not much relevant. Therefore I think my
> >vote is
> >still a valid binding one; but I can vote again on general@incubator,
> >no
> >problem.
> >
> >Sorry for jumping-in too early. Besides a IPMC, I'm also a developer
> >interested in Beam ;-)
> >
> >Cheers,
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >> On Oct 25, 2016, 11:33, at 11:33, "Sergio Fernández"
> ><wi...@apache.org>
> >> wrote:
> >> >+1 (binding)
> >> >
> >> >So far I've successfully checked:
> >> >* signatures and digests
> >> >* source releases file layouts
> >> >* matched git tags and commit ids
> >> >* incubator suffix and disclaimer
> >> >* NOTICE and LICENSE files
> >> >* license headers
> >> >* clean build (Java 1.8.0_91, Scala, 2.11.7, SBT 0.13.9, Debian
> >amd64)
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >Couple of minor issues I've seen it'd be great to have fixed in
> >> >upcoming
> >> >releases:
> >> >* MongoDbIOTest fails (addr already in use) when a Mongo service is
> >> >locally
> >> >running. I'd say the port should be random in the test suite.
> >> >* How did you generated the checksums? Because both SHA1/MD5 can't
> >be
> >> >automatically checked because "no properly formatted SHA1/MD5
> >checksum
> >> >lines found".
> >> >
> >> >Great to see the project moving forward at this speed :-)
> >> >
> >> >Cheers,
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 11:30 PM, Aljoscha Krettek
> >> ><al...@apache.org>
> >> >wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> Hi Team!
> >> >>
> >> >> Please review and vote at your leisure on release candidate #1 for
> >> >version
> >> >> 0.3.0-incubating, as follows:
> >> >> [ ] +1, Approve the release
> >> >> [ ] -1, Do not approve the release (please provide specific
> >comments)
> >> >>
> >> >> The complete staging area is available for your review, which
> >> >includes:
> >> >> * JIRA release notes [1],
> >> >> * the official Apache source release to be deployed to
> >> >dist.apache.org
> >> >> [2],
> >> >> * all artifacts to be deployed to the Maven Central Repository
> >[3],
> >> >> * source code tag "v0.3.0-incubating-RC1" [4],
> >> >> * website pull request listing the release and publishing the API
> >> >reference
> >> >> manual [5].
> >> >>
> >> >> Please keep in mind that this release is not focused on providing
> >new
> >> >> functionality. We want to refine the release process and make
> >stable
> >> >source
> >> >> and binary artefacts available to our users.
> >> >>
> >> >> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. It is adopted by
> >> >majority
> >> >> approval, with at least 3 PPMC affirmative votes.
> >> >>
> >> >> Cheers,
> >> >> Aljoscha
> >> >>
> >> >> [1]
> >> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?
> >> >> projectId=12319527&version=12338051
> >> >> [2] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/beam/0.3.0-
> >> >> incubating/
> >> >> [3]
> >> >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/staging/
> >> >> org/apache/beam/
> >> >> [4]
> >> >>
> >https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-beam.git;a=tag;h=
> >> >> 5d86ff7f04862444c266142b0d5acecb5a6b7144
> >> >> [5] https://github.com/apache/incubator-beam-site/pull/52
> >> >>
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >--
> >> >Sergio Fernández
> >> >Partner Technology Manager
> >> >Redlink GmbH
> >> >m: +43 6602747925
> >> >e: sergio.fernandez@redlink.co
> >> >w: http://redlink.co
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> >--
> >Sergio Fernández
> >Partner Technology Manager
> >Redlink GmbH
> >m: +43 6602747925
> >e: sergio.fernandez@redlink.co
> >w: http://redlink.co
>
--
Sergio Fernández
Partner Technology Manager
Redlink GmbH
m: +43 6602747925
e: sergio.fernandez@redlink.co
w: http://redlink.co
Re: [VOTE] Release 0.3.0-incubating, release candidate #1
Posted by Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb...@nanthrax.net>.
Thanks Sergio ;)
Just tried to explain to the others what is a binding vote ;)
Regards
JB
\u2063\u200b
On Oct 25, 2016, 11:53, at 11:53, "Sergio Fern�ndez" <wi...@apache.org> wrote:
>On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 11:36 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofr�
><jb...@nanthrax.net>
>wrote:
>
>> By the way, your vote is not binding from a podling perspective (you
>are
>> not PPMC). Your vote is binding from IPMC perspective (so when you
>will
>> vote on the incubator mailing list).
>>
>
>Well, PPMC are never binding votes, only IPMC are actually binding.
>That
>I'm not part of the PPMC is not much relevant. Therefore I think my
>vote is
>still a valid binding one; but I can vote again on general@incubator,
>no
>problem.
>
>Sorry for jumping-in too early. Besides a IPMC, I'm also a developer
>interested in Beam ;-)
>
>Cheers,
>
>
>
>
>> On Oct 25, 2016, 11:33, at 11:33, "Sergio Fern�ndez"
><wi...@apache.org>
>> wrote:
>> >+1 (binding)
>> >
>> >So far I've successfully checked:
>> >* signatures and digests
>> >* source releases file layouts
>> >* matched git tags and commit ids
>> >* incubator suffix and disclaimer
>> >* NOTICE and LICENSE files
>> >* license headers
>> >* clean build (Java 1.8.0_91, Scala, 2.11.7, SBT 0.13.9, Debian
>amd64)
>> >
>> >
>> >Couple of minor issues I've seen it'd be great to have fixed in
>> >upcoming
>> >releases:
>> >* MongoDbIOTest fails (addr already in use) when a Mongo service is
>> >locally
>> >running. I'd say the port should be random in the test suite.
>> >* How did you generated the checksums? Because both SHA1/MD5 can't
>be
>> >automatically checked because "no properly formatted SHA1/MD5
>checksum
>> >lines found".
>> >
>> >Great to see the project moving forward at this speed :-)
>> >
>> >Cheers,
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 11:30 PM, Aljoscha Krettek
>> ><al...@apache.org>
>> >wrote:
>> >
>> >> Hi Team!
>> >>
>> >> Please review and vote at your leisure on release candidate #1 for
>> >version
>> >> 0.3.0-incubating, as follows:
>> >> [ ] +1, Approve the release
>> >> [ ] -1, Do not approve the release (please provide specific
>comments)
>> >>
>> >> The complete staging area is available for your review, which
>> >includes:
>> >> * JIRA release notes [1],
>> >> * the official Apache source release to be deployed to
>> >dist.apache.org
>> >> [2],
>> >> * all artifacts to be deployed to the Maven Central Repository
>[3],
>> >> * source code tag "v0.3.0-incubating-RC1" [4],
>> >> * website pull request listing the release and publishing the API
>> >reference
>> >> manual [5].
>> >>
>> >> Please keep in mind that this release is not focused on providing
>new
>> >> functionality. We want to refine the release process and make
>stable
>> >source
>> >> and binary artefacts available to our users.
>> >>
>> >> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. It is adopted by
>> >majority
>> >> approval, with at least 3 PPMC affirmative votes.
>> >>
>> >> Cheers,
>> >> Aljoscha
>> >>
>> >> [1]
>> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?
>> >> projectId=12319527&version=12338051
>> >> [2] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/beam/0.3.0-
>> >> incubating/
>> >> [3]
>> >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/staging/
>> >> org/apache/beam/
>> >> [4]
>> >>
>https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-beam.git;a=tag;h=
>> >> 5d86ff7f04862444c266142b0d5acecb5a6b7144
>> >> [5] https://github.com/apache/incubator-beam-site/pull/52
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >--
>> >Sergio Fern�ndez
>> >Partner Technology Manager
>> >Redlink GmbH
>> >m: +43 6602747925
>> >e: sergio.fernandez@redlink.co
>> >w: http://redlink.co
>>
>
>
>
>--
>Sergio Fern�ndez
>Partner Technology Manager
>Redlink GmbH
>m: +43 6602747925
>e: sergio.fernandez@redlink.co
>w: http://redlink.co
Re: [VOTE] Release 0.3.0-incubating, release candidate #1
Posted by Sergio Fernández <wi...@apache.org>.
On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 11:36 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb...@nanthrax.net>
wrote:
> By the way, your vote is not binding from a podling perspective (you are
> not PPMC). Your vote is binding from IPMC perspective (so when you will
> vote on the incubator mailing list).
>
Well, PPMC are never binding votes, only IPMC are actually binding. That
I'm not part of the PPMC is not much relevant. Therefore I think my vote is
still a valid binding one; but I can vote again on general@incubator, no
problem.
Sorry for jumping-in too early. Besides a IPMC, I'm also a developer
interested in Beam ;-)
Cheers,
> On Oct 25, 2016, 11:33, at 11:33, "Sergio Fernández" <wi...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> >+1 (binding)
> >
> >So far I've successfully checked:
> >* signatures and digests
> >* source releases file layouts
> >* matched git tags and commit ids
> >* incubator suffix and disclaimer
> >* NOTICE and LICENSE files
> >* license headers
> >* clean build (Java 1.8.0_91, Scala, 2.11.7, SBT 0.13.9, Debian amd64)
> >
> >
> >Couple of minor issues I've seen it'd be great to have fixed in
> >upcoming
> >releases:
> >* MongoDbIOTest fails (addr already in use) when a Mongo service is
> >locally
> >running. I'd say the port should be random in the test suite.
> >* How did you generated the checksums? Because both SHA1/MD5 can't be
> >automatically checked because "no properly formatted SHA1/MD5 checksum
> >lines found".
> >
> >Great to see the project moving forward at this speed :-)
> >
> >Cheers,
> >
> >
> >
> >On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 11:30 PM, Aljoscha Krettek
> ><al...@apache.org>
> >wrote:
> >
> >> Hi Team!
> >>
> >> Please review and vote at your leisure on release candidate #1 for
> >version
> >> 0.3.0-incubating, as follows:
> >> [ ] +1, Approve the release
> >> [ ] -1, Do not approve the release (please provide specific comments)
> >>
> >> The complete staging area is available for your review, which
> >includes:
> >> * JIRA release notes [1],
> >> * the official Apache source release to be deployed to
> >dist.apache.org
> >> [2],
> >> * all artifacts to be deployed to the Maven Central Repository [3],
> >> * source code tag "v0.3.0-incubating-RC1" [4],
> >> * website pull request listing the release and publishing the API
> >reference
> >> manual [5].
> >>
> >> Please keep in mind that this release is not focused on providing new
> >> functionality. We want to refine the release process and make stable
> >source
> >> and binary artefacts available to our users.
> >>
> >> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. It is adopted by
> >majority
> >> approval, with at least 3 PPMC affirmative votes.
> >>
> >> Cheers,
> >> Aljoscha
> >>
> >> [1]
> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?
> >> projectId=12319527&version=12338051
> >> [2] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/beam/0.3.0-
> >> incubating/
> >> [3]
> >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/staging/
> >> org/apache/beam/
> >> [4]
> >> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-beam.git;a=tag;h=
> >> 5d86ff7f04862444c266142b0d5acecb5a6b7144
> >> [5] https://github.com/apache/incubator-beam-site/pull/52
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> >--
> >Sergio Fernández
> >Partner Technology Manager
> >Redlink GmbH
> >m: +43 6602747925
> >e: sergio.fernandez@redlink.co
> >w: http://redlink.co
>
--
Sergio Fernández
Partner Technology Manager
Redlink GmbH
m: +43 6602747925
e: sergio.fernandez@redlink.co
w: http://redlink.co
Re: [VOTE] Release 0.3.0-incubating, release candidate #1
Posted by Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb...@nanthrax.net>.
By the way, your vote is not binding from a podling perspective (you are not PPMC). Your vote is binding from IPMC perspective (so when you will vote on the incubator mailing list).
So this vote is +1 (non binding).
Regards
JB
\u2063\u200b
On Oct 25, 2016, 11:33, at 11:33, "Sergio Fern�ndez" <wi...@apache.org> wrote:
>+1 (binding)
>
>So far I've successfully checked:
>* signatures and digests
>* source releases file layouts
>* matched git tags and commit ids
>* incubator suffix and disclaimer
>* NOTICE and LICENSE files
>* license headers
>* clean build (Java 1.8.0_91, Scala, 2.11.7, SBT 0.13.9, Debian amd64)
>
>
>Couple of minor issues I've seen it'd be great to have fixed in
>upcoming
>releases:
>* MongoDbIOTest fails (addr already in use) when a Mongo service is
>locally
>running. I'd say the port should be random in the test suite.
>* How did you generated the checksums? Because both SHA1/MD5 can't be
>automatically checked because "no properly formatted SHA1/MD5 checksum
>lines found".
>
>Great to see the project moving forward at this speed :-)
>
>Cheers,
>
>
>
>On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 11:30 PM, Aljoscha Krettek
><al...@apache.org>
>wrote:
>
>> Hi Team!
>>
>> Please review and vote at your leisure on release candidate #1 for
>version
>> 0.3.0-incubating, as follows:
>> [ ] +1, Approve the release
>> [ ] -1, Do not approve the release (please provide specific comments)
>>
>> The complete staging area is available for your review, which
>includes:
>> * JIRA release notes [1],
>> * the official Apache source release to be deployed to
>dist.apache.org
>> [2],
>> * all artifacts to be deployed to the Maven Central Repository [3],
>> * source code tag "v0.3.0-incubating-RC1" [4],
>> * website pull request listing the release and publishing the API
>reference
>> manual [5].
>>
>> Please keep in mind that this release is not focused on providing new
>> functionality. We want to refine the release process and make stable
>source
>> and binary artefacts available to our users.
>>
>> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. It is adopted by
>majority
>> approval, with at least 3 PPMC affirmative votes.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Aljoscha
>>
>> [1]
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?
>> projectId=12319527&version=12338051
>> [2] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/beam/0.3.0-
>> incubating/
>> [3]
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/staging/
>> org/apache/beam/
>> [4]
>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-beam.git;a=tag;h=
>> 5d86ff7f04862444c266142b0d5acecb5a6b7144
>> [5] https://github.com/apache/incubator-beam-site/pull/52
>>
>
>
>
>--
>Sergio Fern�ndez
>Partner Technology Manager
>Redlink GmbH
>m: +43 6602747925
>e: sergio.fernandez@redlink.co
>w: http://redlink.co
Re: [VOTE] Release 0.3.0-incubating, release candidate #1
Posted by Sergio Fernández <wi...@apache.org>.
+1 (binding)
So far I've successfully checked:
* signatures and digests
* source releases file layouts
* matched git tags and commit ids
* incubator suffix and disclaimer
* NOTICE and LICENSE files
* license headers
* clean build (Java 1.8.0_91, Scala, 2.11.7, SBT 0.13.9, Debian amd64)
Couple of minor issues I've seen it'd be great to have fixed in upcoming
releases:
* MongoDbIOTest fails (addr already in use) when a Mongo service is locally
running. I'd say the port should be random in the test suite.
* How did you generated the checksums? Because both SHA1/MD5 can't be
automatically checked because "no properly formatted SHA1/MD5 checksum
lines found".
Great to see the project moving forward at this speed :-)
Cheers,
On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 11:30 PM, Aljoscha Krettek <al...@apache.org>
wrote:
> Hi Team!
>
> Please review and vote at your leisure on release candidate #1 for version
> 0.3.0-incubating, as follows:
> [ ] +1, Approve the release
> [ ] -1, Do not approve the release (please provide specific comments)
>
> The complete staging area is available for your review, which includes:
> * JIRA release notes [1],
> * the official Apache source release to be deployed to dist.apache.org
> [2],
> * all artifacts to be deployed to the Maven Central Repository [3],
> * source code tag "v0.3.0-incubating-RC1" [4],
> * website pull request listing the release and publishing the API reference
> manual [5].
>
> Please keep in mind that this release is not focused on providing new
> functionality. We want to refine the release process and make stable source
> and binary artefacts available to our users.
>
> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. It is adopted by majority
> approval, with at least 3 PPMC affirmative votes.
>
> Cheers,
> Aljoscha
>
> [1]
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?
> projectId=12319527&version=12338051
> [2] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/beam/0.3.0-
> incubating/
> [3]
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/staging/
> org/apache/beam/
> [4]
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-beam.git;a=tag;h=
> 5d86ff7f04862444c266142b0d5acecb5a6b7144
> [5] https://github.com/apache/incubator-beam-site/pull/52
>
--
Sergio Fernández
Partner Technology Manager
Redlink GmbH
m: +43 6602747925
e: sergio.fernandez@redlink.co
w: http://redlink.co
Re: [VOTE] Release 0.3.0-incubating, release candidate #1
Posted by Davor Bonaci <da...@google.com.INVALID>.
+1 (binding)
My understanding that Kinesis licensing is not an issue since we don't
redistribute that code ourselves. (I'd also be fine in excluding that code
from the source distribution if deemed necessary.)
On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 11:45 AM, Dan Halperin <dh...@google.com.invalid>
wrote:
> I can't tell whether it is a problem that we are distributing the
> beam-sdks-java-io-kinesis module [0].
>
> Here is the dev@ discussion thread [1] and the (unanswered) relevant LEGAL
> thread [2].
> We linked through to a Spark-related discussion [3], and here is how to
> disable distribution of the KinesisIO module [4].
>
> [0]
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/staging/
> org/apache/beam/beam-sdks-java-io-kinesis/
> [1]
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/6784bc005f329d93fd59d0f8759ed4
> 745e72f105e39d869e094d9645@%3Cdev.beam.apache.org%3E
> [2]
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-198?focusedCommentId=15471529&
> page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:
> comment-tabpanel#comment-15471529
> [3] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-17418
> [4] https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15167/files
>
> Dan
>
> On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 11:01 AM, Seetharam Venkatesh <
> venkatesh@innerzeal.com> wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> > Thanks!
> >
> > On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 2:30 PM Aljoscha Krettek <al...@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Team!
> > >
> > > Please review and vote at your leisure on release candidate #1 for
> > version
> > > 0.3.0-incubating, as follows:
> > > [ ] +1, Approve the release
> > > [ ] -1, Do not approve the release (please provide specific comments)
> > >
> > > The complete staging area is available for your review, which includes:
> > > * JIRA release notes [1],
> > > * the official Apache source release to be deployed to dist.apache.org
> > > [2],
> > > * all artifacts to be deployed to the Maven Central Repository [3],
> > > * source code tag "v0.3.0-incubating-RC1" [4],
> > > * website pull request listing the release and publishing the API
> > reference
> > > manual [5].
> > >
> > > Please keep in mind that this release is not focused on providing new
> > > functionality. We want to refine the release process and make stable
> > source
> > > and binary artefacts available to our users.
> > >
> > > The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. It is adopted by majority
> > > approval, with at least 3 PPMC affirmative votes.
> > >
> > > Cheers,
> > > Aljoscha
> > >
> > > [1]
> > >
> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?
> > projectId=12319527&version=12338051
> > > [2]
> > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/beam/0.3.0-
> incubating/
> > > [3]
> > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/staging/
> > org/apache/beam/
> > > [4]
> > >
> > > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-beam.git;a=tag;h=
> > 5d86ff7f04862444c266142b0d5acecb5a6b7144
> > > [5] https://github.com/apache/incubator-beam-site/pull/52
> > >
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] Release 0.3.0-incubating, release candidate #1
Posted by Amit Sela <am...@gmail.com>.
+1 (binding)
On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 10:53 AM Maximilian Michels <mx...@apache.org> wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> Thanks for managing the release, Aljoscha!
>
> -Max
>
>
> On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 6:46 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb...@nanthrax.net>
> wrote:
> > Agree. We already discussed about that on the mailing list. I mentionned
> this some weeks ago.
> >
> > Regards
> > JB
> >
> >
> >
> > On Oct 26, 2016, 02:26, at 02:26, Dan Halperin
> <dh...@google.com.INVALID> wrote:
> >>My reading of the LEGAL threads is that since we are not including
> >>(shading
> >>or bundling) the ASL-licensed code we are fine to distribute kinesis-io
> >>module. This was the original conclusion that LEGAL-198 got to, and
> >>that
> >>thread has not been resolved differently (even if Spark went ahead and
> >>broke the assembly). The beam-sdks-java-io-kinesis module is an
> >>optional
> >>part (Beam materially works just fine without it).
> >>
> >>So I think we're fine to keep this vote open.
> >>
> >>+1 (binding) on the release
> >>
> >>Thanks Aljoscha!
> >>
> >>
> >>On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 12:07 PM, Aljoscha Krettek
> >><al...@apache.org>
> >>wrote:
> >>
> >>> Yep, I was looking at those same threads when I reviewing the
> >>artefacts.
> >>> The release was already close to being finished so I went through
> >>with it
> >>> but if we think it's not good to have them in we should quickly
> >>cancel in
> >>> favour of a new RC without a published Kinesis connector.
> >>>
> >>> On Tue, 25 Oct 2016 at 20:46 Dan Halperin
> >><dh...@google.com.invalid>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> > I can't tell whether it is a problem that we are distributing the
> >>> > beam-sdks-java-io-kinesis module [0].
> >>> >
> >>> > Here is the dev@ discussion thread [1] and the (unanswered)
> >>relevant
> >>> LEGAL
> >>> > thread [2].
> >>> > We linked through to a Spark-related discussion [3], and here is
> >>how to
> >>> > disable distribution of the KinesisIO module [4].
> >>> >
> >>> > [0]
> >>> >
> >>> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/staging/
> >>> org/apache/beam/beam-sdks-java-io-kinesis/
> >>> > [1]
> >>> >
> >>> > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/6784bc005f329d93fd59d0f8759ed4
> >>> 745e72f105e39d869e094d9645@%3Cdev.beam.apache.org%3E
> >>> > [2]
> >>> >
> >>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-198?
> >>> focusedCommentId=15471529&page=com.atlassian.jira.
> >>> plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-15471529
> >>> > [3] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-17418
> >>> > [4] https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15167/files
> >>> >
> >>> > Dan
> >>> >
> >>> > On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 11:01 AM, Seetharam Venkatesh <
> >>> > venkatesh@innerzeal.com> wrote:
> >>> >
> >>> > > +1
> >>> > >
> >>> > > Thanks!
> >>> > >
> >>> > > On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 2:30 PM Aljoscha Krettek
> >><al...@apache.org>
> >>> > > wrote:
> >>> > >
> >>> > > > Hi Team!
> >>> > > >
> >>> > > > Please review and vote at your leisure on release candidate #1
> >>for
> >>> > > version
> >>> > > > 0.3.0-incubating, as follows:
> >>> > > > [ ] +1, Approve the release
> >>> > > > [ ] -1, Do not approve the release (please provide specific
> >>comments)
> >>> > > >
> >>> > > > The complete staging area is available for your review, which
> >>> includes:
> >>> > > > * JIRA release notes [1],
> >>> > > > * the official Apache source release to be deployed to
> >>> dist.apache.org
> >>> > > > [2],
> >>> > > > * all artifacts to be deployed to the Maven Central Repository
> >>[3],
> >>> > > > * source code tag "v0.3.0-incubating-RC1" [4],
> >>> > > > * website pull request listing the release and publishing the
> >>API
> >>> > > reference
> >>> > > > manual [5].
> >>> > > >
> >>> > > > Please keep in mind that this release is not focused on
> >>providing new
> >>> > > > functionality. We want to refine the release process and make
> >>stable
> >>> > > source
> >>> > > > and binary artefacts available to our users.
> >>> > > >
> >>> > > > The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. It is adopted by
> >>> majority
> >>> > > > approval, with at least 3 PPMC affirmative votes.
> >>> > > >
> >>> > > > Cheers,
> >>> > > > Aljoscha
> >>> > > >
> >>> > > > [1]
> >>> > > >
> >>> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?
> >>> > > projectId=12319527&version=12338051
> >>> > > > [2]
> >>> > > >
> >>> >
> >>https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/beam/0.3.0-incubating/
> >>> > > > [3]
> >>> > > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/staging/
> >>> > > org/apache/beam/
> >>> > > > [4]
> >>> > > >
> >>> > > > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-beam.
> >>> git;a=tag;h=
> >>> > > 5d86ff7f04862444c266142b0d5acecb5a6b7144
> >>> > > > [5] https://github.com/apache/incubator-beam-site/pull/52
> >>> > > >
> >>> > >
> >>> >
> >>>
>
Re: [VOTE] Release 0.3.0-incubating, release candidate #1
Posted by Maximilian Michels <mx...@apache.org>.
+1 (binding)
Thanks for managing the release, Aljoscha!
-Max
On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 6:46 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb...@nanthrax.net> wrote:
> Agree. We already discussed about that on the mailing list. I mentionned this some weeks ago.
>
> Regards
> JB
>
>
>
> On Oct 26, 2016, 02:26, at 02:26, Dan Halperin <dh...@google.com.INVALID> wrote:
>>My reading of the LEGAL threads is that since we are not including
>>(shading
>>or bundling) the ASL-licensed code we are fine to distribute kinesis-io
>>module. This was the original conclusion that LEGAL-198 got to, and
>>that
>>thread has not been resolved differently (even if Spark went ahead and
>>broke the assembly). The beam-sdks-java-io-kinesis module is an
>>optional
>>part (Beam materially works just fine without it).
>>
>>So I think we're fine to keep this vote open.
>>
>>+1 (binding) on the release
>>
>>Thanks Aljoscha!
>>
>>
>>On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 12:07 PM, Aljoscha Krettek
>><al...@apache.org>
>>wrote:
>>
>>> Yep, I was looking at those same threads when I reviewing the
>>artefacts.
>>> The release was already close to being finished so I went through
>>with it
>>> but if we think it's not good to have them in we should quickly
>>cancel in
>>> favour of a new RC without a published Kinesis connector.
>>>
>>> On Tue, 25 Oct 2016 at 20:46 Dan Halperin
>><dh...@google.com.invalid>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> > I can't tell whether it is a problem that we are distributing the
>>> > beam-sdks-java-io-kinesis module [0].
>>> >
>>> > Here is the dev@ discussion thread [1] and the (unanswered)
>>relevant
>>> LEGAL
>>> > thread [2].
>>> > We linked through to a Spark-related discussion [3], and here is
>>how to
>>> > disable distribution of the KinesisIO module [4].
>>> >
>>> > [0]
>>> >
>>> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/staging/
>>> org/apache/beam/beam-sdks-java-io-kinesis/
>>> > [1]
>>> >
>>> > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/6784bc005f329d93fd59d0f8759ed4
>>> 745e72f105e39d869e094d9645@%3Cdev.beam.apache.org%3E
>>> > [2]
>>> >
>>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-198?
>>> focusedCommentId=15471529&page=com.atlassian.jira.
>>> plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-15471529
>>> > [3] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-17418
>>> > [4] https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15167/files
>>> >
>>> > Dan
>>> >
>>> > On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 11:01 AM, Seetharam Venkatesh <
>>> > venkatesh@innerzeal.com> wrote:
>>> >
>>> > > +1
>>> > >
>>> > > Thanks!
>>> > >
>>> > > On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 2:30 PM Aljoscha Krettek
>><al...@apache.org>
>>> > > wrote:
>>> > >
>>> > > > Hi Team!
>>> > > >
>>> > > > Please review and vote at your leisure on release candidate #1
>>for
>>> > > version
>>> > > > 0.3.0-incubating, as follows:
>>> > > > [ ] +1, Approve the release
>>> > > > [ ] -1, Do not approve the release (please provide specific
>>comments)
>>> > > >
>>> > > > The complete staging area is available for your review, which
>>> includes:
>>> > > > * JIRA release notes [1],
>>> > > > * the official Apache source release to be deployed to
>>> dist.apache.org
>>> > > > [2],
>>> > > > * all artifacts to be deployed to the Maven Central Repository
>>[3],
>>> > > > * source code tag "v0.3.0-incubating-RC1" [4],
>>> > > > * website pull request listing the release and publishing the
>>API
>>> > > reference
>>> > > > manual [5].
>>> > > >
>>> > > > Please keep in mind that this release is not focused on
>>providing new
>>> > > > functionality. We want to refine the release process and make
>>stable
>>> > > source
>>> > > > and binary artefacts available to our users.
>>> > > >
>>> > > > The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. It is adopted by
>>> majority
>>> > > > approval, with at least 3 PPMC affirmative votes.
>>> > > >
>>> > > > Cheers,
>>> > > > Aljoscha
>>> > > >
>>> > > > [1]
>>> > > >
>>> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?
>>> > > projectId=12319527&version=12338051
>>> > > > [2]
>>> > > >
>>> >
>>https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/beam/0.3.0-incubating/
>>> > > > [3]
>>> > > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/staging/
>>> > > org/apache/beam/
>>> > > > [4]
>>> > > >
>>> > > > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-beam.
>>> git;a=tag;h=
>>> > > 5d86ff7f04862444c266142b0d5acecb5a6b7144
>>> > > > [5] https://github.com/apache/incubator-beam-site/pull/52
>>> > > >
>>> > >
>>> >
>>>
Re: [VOTE] Release 0.3.0-incubating, release candidate #1
Posted by Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb...@nanthrax.net>.
Agree. We already discussed about that on the mailing list. I mentionned this some weeks ago.
Regards
JB
\u2063\u200b
On Oct 26, 2016, 02:26, at 02:26, Dan Halperin <dh...@google.com.INVALID> wrote:
>My reading of the LEGAL threads is that since we are not including
>(shading
>or bundling) the ASL-licensed code we are fine to distribute kinesis-io
>module. This was the original conclusion that LEGAL-198 got to, and
>that
>thread has not been resolved differently (even if Spark went ahead and
>broke the assembly). The beam-sdks-java-io-kinesis module is an
>optional
>part (Beam materially works just fine without it).
>
>So I think we're fine to keep this vote open.
>
>+1 (binding) on the release
>
>Thanks Aljoscha!
>
>
>On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 12:07 PM, Aljoscha Krettek
><al...@apache.org>
>wrote:
>
>> Yep, I was looking at those same threads when I reviewing the
>artefacts.
>> The release was already close to being finished so I went through
>with it
>> but if we think it's not good to have them in we should quickly
>cancel in
>> favour of a new RC without a published Kinesis connector.
>>
>> On Tue, 25 Oct 2016 at 20:46 Dan Halperin
><dh...@google.com.invalid>
>> wrote:
>>
>> > I can't tell whether it is a problem that we are distributing the
>> > beam-sdks-java-io-kinesis module [0].
>> >
>> > Here is the dev@ discussion thread [1] and the (unanswered)
>relevant
>> LEGAL
>> > thread [2].
>> > We linked through to a Spark-related discussion [3], and here is
>how to
>> > disable distribution of the KinesisIO module [4].
>> >
>> > [0]
>> >
>> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/staging/
>> org/apache/beam/beam-sdks-java-io-kinesis/
>> > [1]
>> >
>> > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/6784bc005f329d93fd59d0f8759ed4
>> 745e72f105e39d869e094d9645@%3Cdev.beam.apache.org%3E
>> > [2]
>> >
>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-198?
>> focusedCommentId=15471529&page=com.atlassian.jira.
>> plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-15471529
>> > [3] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-17418
>> > [4] https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15167/files
>> >
>> > Dan
>> >
>> > On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 11:01 AM, Seetharam Venkatesh <
>> > venkatesh@innerzeal.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > > +1
>> > >
>> > > Thanks!
>> > >
>> > > On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 2:30 PM Aljoscha Krettek
><al...@apache.org>
>> > > wrote:
>> > >
>> > > > Hi Team!
>> > > >
>> > > > Please review and vote at your leisure on release candidate #1
>for
>> > > version
>> > > > 0.3.0-incubating, as follows:
>> > > > [ ] +1, Approve the release
>> > > > [ ] -1, Do not approve the release (please provide specific
>comments)
>> > > >
>> > > > The complete staging area is available for your review, which
>> includes:
>> > > > * JIRA release notes [1],
>> > > > * the official Apache source release to be deployed to
>> dist.apache.org
>> > > > [2],
>> > > > * all artifacts to be deployed to the Maven Central Repository
>[3],
>> > > > * source code tag "v0.3.0-incubating-RC1" [4],
>> > > > * website pull request listing the release and publishing the
>API
>> > > reference
>> > > > manual [5].
>> > > >
>> > > > Please keep in mind that this release is not focused on
>providing new
>> > > > functionality. We want to refine the release process and make
>stable
>> > > source
>> > > > and binary artefacts available to our users.
>> > > >
>> > > > The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. It is adopted by
>> majority
>> > > > approval, with at least 3 PPMC affirmative votes.
>> > > >
>> > > > Cheers,
>> > > > Aljoscha
>> > > >
>> > > > [1]
>> > > >
>> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?
>> > > projectId=12319527&version=12338051
>> > > > [2]
>> > > >
>> >
>https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/beam/0.3.0-incubating/
>> > > > [3]
>> > > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/staging/
>> > > org/apache/beam/
>> > > > [4]
>> > > >
>> > > > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-beam.
>> git;a=tag;h=
>> > > 5d86ff7f04862444c266142b0d5acecb5a6b7144
>> > > > [5] https://github.com/apache/incubator-beam-site/pull/52
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>>
Re: [VOTE] Release 0.3.0-incubating, release candidate #1
Posted by Kenneth Knowles <kl...@google.com.INVALID>.
+1 (binding)
On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 5:26 PM Dan Halperin <dh...@google.com.invalid>
wrote:
> My reading of the LEGAL threads is that since we are not including (shading
> or bundling) the ASL-licensed code we are fine to distribute kinesis-io
> module. This was the original conclusion that LEGAL-198 got to, and that
> thread has not been resolved differently (even if Spark went ahead and
> broke the assembly). The beam-sdks-java-io-kinesis module is an optional
> part (Beam materially works just fine without it).
>
> So I think we're fine to keep this vote open.
>
> +1 (binding) on the release
>
> Thanks Aljoscha!
>
>
> On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 12:07 PM, Aljoscha Krettek <al...@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
> > Yep, I was looking at those same threads when I reviewing the artefacts.
> > The release was already close to being finished so I went through with it
> > but if we think it's not good to have them in we should quickly cancel in
> > favour of a new RC without a published Kinesis connector.
> >
> > On Tue, 25 Oct 2016 at 20:46 Dan Halperin <dh...@google.com.invalid>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > I can't tell whether it is a problem that we are distributing the
> > > beam-sdks-java-io-kinesis module [0].
> > >
> > > Here is the dev@ discussion thread [1] and the (unanswered) relevant
> > LEGAL
> > > thread [2].
> > > We linked through to a Spark-related discussion [3], and here is how to
> > > disable distribution of the KinesisIO module [4].
> > >
> > > [0]
> > >
> > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/staging/
> > org/apache/beam/beam-sdks-java-io-kinesis/
> > > [1]
> > >
> > > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/6784bc005f329d93fd59d0f8759ed4
> > 745e72f105e39d869e094d9645@%3Cdev.beam.apache.org%3E
> > > [2]
> > >
> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-198?
> > focusedCommentId=15471529&page=com.atlassian.jira.
> > plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-15471529
> > > [3] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-17418
> > > [4] https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15167/files
> > >
> > > Dan
> > >
> > > On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 11:01 AM, Seetharam Venkatesh <
> > > venkatesh@innerzeal.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > +1
> > > >
> > > > Thanks!
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 2:30 PM Aljoscha Krettek <
> aljoscha@apache.org>
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Hi Team!
> > > > >
> > > > > Please review and vote at your leisure on release candidate #1 for
> > > > version
> > > > > 0.3.0-incubating, as follows:
> > > > > [ ] +1, Approve the release
> > > > > [ ] -1, Do not approve the release (please provide specific
> comments)
> > > > >
> > > > > The complete staging area is available for your review, which
> > includes:
> > > > > * JIRA release notes [1],
> > > > > * the official Apache source release to be deployed to
> > dist.apache.org
> > > > > [2],
> > > > > * all artifacts to be deployed to the Maven Central Repository [3],
> > > > > * source code tag "v0.3.0-incubating-RC1" [4],
> > > > > * website pull request listing the release and publishing the API
> > > > reference
> > > > > manual [5].
> > > > >
> > > > > Please keep in mind that this release is not focused on providing
> new
> > > > > functionality. We want to refine the release process and make
> stable
> > > > source
> > > > > and binary artefacts available to our users.
> > > > >
> > > > > The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. It is adopted by
> > majority
> > > > > approval, with at least 3 PPMC affirmative votes.
> > > > >
> > > > > Cheers,
> > > > > Aljoscha
> > > > >
> > > > > [1]
> > > > >
> > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?
> > > > projectId=12319527&version=12338051
> > > > > [2]
> > > > >
> > >
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/beam/0.3.0-incubating/
> > > > > [3]
> > > > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/staging/
> > > > org/apache/beam/
> > > > > [4]
> > > > >
> > > > > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-beam.
> > git;a=tag;h=
> > > > 5d86ff7f04862444c266142b0d5acecb5a6b7144
> > > > > [5] https://github.com/apache/incubator-beam-site/pull/52
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] Release 0.3.0-incubating, release candidate #1
Posted by Dan Halperin <dh...@google.com.INVALID>.
My reading of the LEGAL threads is that since we are not including (shading
or bundling) the ASL-licensed code we are fine to distribute kinesis-io
module. This was the original conclusion that LEGAL-198 got to, and that
thread has not been resolved differently (even if Spark went ahead and
broke the assembly). The beam-sdks-java-io-kinesis module is an optional
part (Beam materially works just fine without it).
So I think we're fine to keep this vote open.
+1 (binding) on the release
Thanks Aljoscha!
On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 12:07 PM, Aljoscha Krettek <al...@apache.org>
wrote:
> Yep, I was looking at those same threads when I reviewing the artefacts.
> The release was already close to being finished so I went through with it
> but if we think it's not good to have them in we should quickly cancel in
> favour of a new RC without a published Kinesis connector.
>
> On Tue, 25 Oct 2016 at 20:46 Dan Halperin <dh...@google.com.invalid>
> wrote:
>
> > I can't tell whether it is a problem that we are distributing the
> > beam-sdks-java-io-kinesis module [0].
> >
> > Here is the dev@ discussion thread [1] and the (unanswered) relevant
> LEGAL
> > thread [2].
> > We linked through to a Spark-related discussion [3], and here is how to
> > disable distribution of the KinesisIO module [4].
> >
> > [0]
> >
> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/staging/
> org/apache/beam/beam-sdks-java-io-kinesis/
> > [1]
> >
> > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/6784bc005f329d93fd59d0f8759ed4
> 745e72f105e39d869e094d9645@%3Cdev.beam.apache.org%3E
> > [2]
> >
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-198?
> focusedCommentId=15471529&page=com.atlassian.jira.
> plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-15471529
> > [3] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-17418
> > [4] https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15167/files
> >
> > Dan
> >
> > On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 11:01 AM, Seetharam Venkatesh <
> > venkatesh@innerzeal.com> wrote:
> >
> > > +1
> > >
> > > Thanks!
> > >
> > > On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 2:30 PM Aljoscha Krettek <al...@apache.org>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi Team!
> > > >
> > > > Please review and vote at your leisure on release candidate #1 for
> > > version
> > > > 0.3.0-incubating, as follows:
> > > > [ ] +1, Approve the release
> > > > [ ] -1, Do not approve the release (please provide specific comments)
> > > >
> > > > The complete staging area is available for your review, which
> includes:
> > > > * JIRA release notes [1],
> > > > * the official Apache source release to be deployed to
> dist.apache.org
> > > > [2],
> > > > * all artifacts to be deployed to the Maven Central Repository [3],
> > > > * source code tag "v0.3.0-incubating-RC1" [4],
> > > > * website pull request listing the release and publishing the API
> > > reference
> > > > manual [5].
> > > >
> > > > Please keep in mind that this release is not focused on providing new
> > > > functionality. We want to refine the release process and make stable
> > > source
> > > > and binary artefacts available to our users.
> > > >
> > > > The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. It is adopted by
> majority
> > > > approval, with at least 3 PPMC affirmative votes.
> > > >
> > > > Cheers,
> > > > Aljoscha
> > > >
> > > > [1]
> > > >
> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?
> > > projectId=12319527&version=12338051
> > > > [2]
> > > >
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/beam/0.3.0-incubating/
> > > > [3]
> > > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/staging/
> > > org/apache/beam/
> > > > [4]
> > > >
> > > > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-beam.
> git;a=tag;h=
> > > 5d86ff7f04862444c266142b0d5acecb5a6b7144
> > > > [5] https://github.com/apache/incubator-beam-site/pull/52
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] Release 0.3.0-incubating, release candidate #1
Posted by Aljoscha Krettek <al...@apache.org>.
Yep, I was looking at those same threads when I reviewing the artefacts.
The release was already close to being finished so I went through with it
but if we think it's not good to have them in we should quickly cancel in
favour of a new RC without a published Kinesis connector.
On Tue, 25 Oct 2016 at 20:46 Dan Halperin <dh...@google.com.invalid>
wrote:
> I can't tell whether it is a problem that we are distributing the
> beam-sdks-java-io-kinesis module [0].
>
> Here is the dev@ discussion thread [1] and the (unanswered) relevant LEGAL
> thread [2].
> We linked through to a Spark-related discussion [3], and here is how to
> disable distribution of the KinesisIO module [4].
>
> [0]
>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/staging/org/apache/beam/beam-sdks-java-io-kinesis/
> [1]
>
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/6784bc005f329d93fd59d0f8759ed4745e72f105e39d869e094d9645@%3Cdev.beam.apache.org%3E
> [2]
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-198?focusedCommentId=15471529&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-15471529
> [3] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-17418
> [4] https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15167/files
>
> Dan
>
> On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 11:01 AM, Seetharam Venkatesh <
> venkatesh@innerzeal.com> wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> > Thanks!
> >
> > On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 2:30 PM Aljoscha Krettek <al...@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Team!
> > >
> > > Please review and vote at your leisure on release candidate #1 for
> > version
> > > 0.3.0-incubating, as follows:
> > > [ ] +1, Approve the release
> > > [ ] -1, Do not approve the release (please provide specific comments)
> > >
> > > The complete staging area is available for your review, which includes:
> > > * JIRA release notes [1],
> > > * the official Apache source release to be deployed to dist.apache.org
> > > [2],
> > > * all artifacts to be deployed to the Maven Central Repository [3],
> > > * source code tag "v0.3.0-incubating-RC1" [4],
> > > * website pull request listing the release and publishing the API
> > reference
> > > manual [5].
> > >
> > > Please keep in mind that this release is not focused on providing new
> > > functionality. We want to refine the release process and make stable
> > source
> > > and binary artefacts available to our users.
> > >
> > > The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. It is adopted by majority
> > > approval, with at least 3 PPMC affirmative votes.
> > >
> > > Cheers,
> > > Aljoscha
> > >
> > > [1]
> > >
> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?
> > projectId=12319527&version=12338051
> > > [2]
> > >
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/beam/0.3.0-incubating/
> > > [3]
> > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/staging/
> > org/apache/beam/
> > > [4]
> > >
> > > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-beam.git;a=tag;h=
> > 5d86ff7f04862444c266142b0d5acecb5a6b7144
> > > [5] https://github.com/apache/incubator-beam-site/pull/52
> > >
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] Release 0.3.0-incubating, release candidate #1
Posted by Dan Halperin <dh...@google.com.INVALID>.
I can't tell whether it is a problem that we are distributing the
beam-sdks-java-io-kinesis module [0].
Here is the dev@ discussion thread [1] and the (unanswered) relevant LEGAL
thread [2].
We linked through to a Spark-related discussion [3], and here is how to
disable distribution of the KinesisIO module [4].
[0]
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/staging/org/apache/beam/beam-sdks-java-io-kinesis/
[1]
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/6784bc005f329d93fd59d0f8759ed4745e72f105e39d869e094d9645@%3Cdev.beam.apache.org%3E
[2]
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-198?focusedCommentId=15471529&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-15471529
[3] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-17418
[4] https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15167/files
Dan
On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 11:01 AM, Seetharam Venkatesh <
venkatesh@innerzeal.com> wrote:
> +1
>
> Thanks!
>
> On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 2:30 PM Aljoscha Krettek <al...@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
> > Hi Team!
> >
> > Please review and vote at your leisure on release candidate #1 for
> version
> > 0.3.0-incubating, as follows:
> > [ ] +1, Approve the release
> > [ ] -1, Do not approve the release (please provide specific comments)
> >
> > The complete staging area is available for your review, which includes:
> > * JIRA release notes [1],
> > * the official Apache source release to be deployed to dist.apache.org
> > [2],
> > * all artifacts to be deployed to the Maven Central Repository [3],
> > * source code tag "v0.3.0-incubating-RC1" [4],
> > * website pull request listing the release and publishing the API
> reference
> > manual [5].
> >
> > Please keep in mind that this release is not focused on providing new
> > functionality. We want to refine the release process and make stable
> source
> > and binary artefacts available to our users.
> >
> > The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. It is adopted by majority
> > approval, with at least 3 PPMC affirmative votes.
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Aljoscha
> >
> > [1]
> >
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?
> projectId=12319527&version=12338051
> > [2]
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/beam/0.3.0-incubating/
> > [3]
> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/staging/
> org/apache/beam/
> > [4]
> >
> > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-beam.git;a=tag;h=
> 5d86ff7f04862444c266142b0d5acecb5a6b7144
> > [5] https://github.com/apache/incubator-beam-site/pull/52
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] Release 0.3.0-incubating, release candidate #1
Posted by Seetharam Venkatesh <ve...@innerzeal.com>.
+1
Thanks!
On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 2:30 PM Aljoscha Krettek <al...@apache.org>
wrote:
> Hi Team!
>
> Please review and vote at your leisure on release candidate #1 for version
> 0.3.0-incubating, as follows:
> [ ] +1, Approve the release
> [ ] -1, Do not approve the release (please provide specific comments)
>
> The complete staging area is available for your review, which includes:
> * JIRA release notes [1],
> * the official Apache source release to be deployed to dist.apache.org
> [2],
> * all artifacts to be deployed to the Maven Central Repository [3],
> * source code tag "v0.3.0-incubating-RC1" [4],
> * website pull request listing the release and publishing the API reference
> manual [5].
>
> Please keep in mind that this release is not focused on providing new
> functionality. We want to refine the release process and make stable source
> and binary artefacts available to our users.
>
> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. It is adopted by majority
> approval, with at least 3 PPMC affirmative votes.
>
> Cheers,
> Aljoscha
>
> [1]
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12319527&version=12338051
> [2]
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/beam/0.3.0-incubating/
> [3]
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/staging/org/apache/beam/
> [4]
>
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-beam.git;a=tag;h=5d86ff7f04862444c266142b0d5acecb5a6b7144
> [5] https://github.com/apache/incubator-beam-site/pull/52
>