You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@geode.apache.org by "Wes Williams (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2018/02/05 22:12:00 UTC
[jira] [Issue Comment Deleted] (GEODE-2932) Users would like option
for PR with empty data policy
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-2932?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
Wes Williams updated GEODE-2932:
--------------------------------
Comment: was deleted
(was: This can be done now with local regions but it's a admin royal pain. Gfsh doesn't record the local regions and it increases complexity for the users. An empty PR is needed.)
> Users would like option for PR with empty data policy
> ------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: GEODE-2932
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-2932
> Project: Geode
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: regions
> Reporter: Fred Krone
> Priority: Major
> Labels: storage_2
>
> Allow for accessor partitioned regions to route incoming operations.
> The idea is to use a PR to control distributed/partitioned _processing_ of events without the need to cache them. This option would be especially useful for streaming cases where the target is a PR's attached AsyncEventQueue. Also useful when the target is a PR's attached CacheListener. We have developed some work-around for this in the field, but they require significant code and complex configuration, and limited to event input from peer-clients.
> For many use-cases, there would still be a need to co-locate other standard/caching PR's with the "empty" one to enable enrichment, transformation, and similar logic in the custom event callbacks (either CacheListener or AEQ Listener).
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)