You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@community.apache.org by "Kevin A. McGrail" <km...@apache.org> on 2019/05/05 14:18:30 UTC
Re: /tags nightly commits
On 5/5/2019 6:10 AM, Paul Stead wrote:
> Promotions and tags still seem to be a little problematic at the moment. A
> run of build/mkupdates/listpromotable locally shows +300 lines difference
> to active.list over the one being submitted.
Before I deal with this issue:
+Dev.
TL;DR: REMINDER: PLEASE use a make test on your local checkout before
committing!
We had two issues. It appears an svn commit failed on a release and
that left cruft that was colliding for commit. That issue was caused by
a manual edit to active.list:
Revision *1854477*
<http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1854477> - (view
<http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/spamassassin/trunk/rules/active.list?revision=1854477&view=markup>)
(download
<http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/spamassassin/trunk/rules/active.list?revision=1854477&view=co>)
(annotate
<http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/spamassassin/trunk/rules/active.list?annotate=1854477>)
- [select for diffs]
<http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/spamassassin/trunk/rules/active.list?view=log&r1=1854477>
Modified /Wed Feb 27 18:16:20 2019 UTC/ (2 months ago) by /gbechis/
File length: 15052 byte(s)
Diff to previous 1854447
<http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/spamassassin/trunk/rules/active.list?r1=1854447&r2=1854477>
(colored
<http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/spamassassin/trunk/rules/active.list?r1=1854447&r2=1854477&diff_format=h>)
Switch to https and fix some 404 errors
bz #7652
The second issue is a continuing one and that is committers submitting
without 'make test' first. This occurred in January when I tried to
build the last release. If the svn for trunk including rules is broken,
it will break masscheck, etc. We are currently passing again so just a
friendly reminder. It takes a village to stop a spammer :-)
So now, what I see in the logs is that the commit didn't occur but
there is no error, nothing. Checking
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/spamassassin/trunk/rules/active.list?view=log
concurs:
5/5 (note that Committing promotions is NOT followed by an svn commit)
+ echo 'Committing promotions in rules/active.list...'
+ svn commit -m 'promotions validated' rules/active.list
Committing promotions in rules/active.list...
+ /usr/bin/perl masses/rule-qa/list-bad-rules
5/4 (example where the commit worked)
+ echo 'Committing promotions in rules/active.list...'
Committing promotions in rules/active.list...
+ svn commit -m 'promotions validated' rules/active.list
Sending rules/active.list
Transmitting file data .done
Committing transaction...
Committed revision 1858595.
I'm out of time to keep pursuing this but hoping someone else can look
at it.
Regards,
KAM
Re: /tags nightly commits
Posted by "Kevin A. McGrail" <km...@apache.org>.
On 5/5/2019 10:34 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> E_WRONG_LIST
>
Thanks Mark and apologies to comdev for the noise!
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@community.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@community.apache.org
Re: /tags nightly commits
Posted by Mark Thomas <ma...@apache.org>.
E_WRONG_LIST
Mark
On 05/05/2019 15:18, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
> On 5/5/2019 6:10 AM, Paul Stead wrote:
>> Promotions and tags still seem to be a little problematic at the moment. A
>> run of build/mkupdates/listpromotable locally shows +300 lines difference
>> to active.list over the one being submitted.
>
> Before I deal with this issue:
>
> +Dev.
>
> TL;DR: REMINDER: PLEASE use a make test on your local checkout before
> committing!
>
> We had two issues. It appears an svn commit failed on a release and
> that left cruft that was colliding for commit. That issue was caused by
> a manual edit to active.list:
>
> Revision *1854477*
> <http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1854477> - (view
> <http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/spamassassin/trunk/rules/active.list?revision=1854477&view=markup>)
> (download
> <http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/spamassassin/trunk/rules/active.list?revision=1854477&view=co>)
> (annotate
> <http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/spamassassin/trunk/rules/active.list?annotate=1854477>)
> - [select for diffs]
> <http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/spamassassin/trunk/rules/active.list?view=log&r1=1854477>
>
> Modified /Wed Feb 27 18:16:20 2019 UTC/ (2 months ago) by /gbechis/
> File length: 15052 byte(s)
> Diff to previous 1854447
> <http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/spamassassin/trunk/rules/active.list?r1=1854447&r2=1854477>
> (colored
> <http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/spamassassin/trunk/rules/active.list?r1=1854447&r2=1854477&diff_format=h>)
>
>
> Switch to https and fix some 404 errors
> bz #7652
>
> The second issue is a continuing one and that is committers submitting
> without 'make test' first. This occurred in January when I tried to
> build the last release. If the svn for trunk including rules is broken,
> it will break masscheck, etc. We are currently passing again so just a
> friendly reminder. It takes a village to stop a spammer :-)
>
>
> So now, what I see in the logs is that the commit didn't occur but
> there is no error, nothing. Checking
> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/spamassassin/trunk/rules/active.list?view=log
> concurs:
>
> 5/5 (note that Committing promotions is NOT followed by an svn commit)
>
> + echo 'Committing promotions in rules/active.list...'
> + svn commit -m 'promotions validated' rules/active.list
> Committing promotions in rules/active.list...
> + /usr/bin/perl masses/rule-qa/list-bad-rules
>
> 5/4 (example where the commit worked)
> + echo 'Committing promotions in rules/active.list...'
> Committing promotions in rules/active.list...
> + svn commit -m 'promotions validated' rules/active.list
> Sending rules/active.list
> Transmitting file data .done
> Committing transaction...
> Committed revision 1858595.
>
>
> I'm out of time to keep pursuing this but hoping someone else can look
> at it.
>
> Regards,
>
> KAM
>
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@community.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@community.apache.org
Re: /tags nightly commits
Posted by "Kevin A. McGrail" <km...@apache.org>.
Resending with correct dev list :-)
On 5/5/2019 6:10 AM, Paul Stead wrote:
> Promotions and tags still seem to be a little problematic at the moment. A
> run of build/mkupdates/listpromotable locally shows +300 lines difference
> to active.list over the one being submitted.
Before I deal with this issue:
+Dev.
TL;DR: REMINDER: PLEASE use a make test on your local checkout before
committing!
We had two issues. It appears an svn commit failed on a release and
that left cruft that was colliding for commit. That issue was caused by
a manual edit to active.list:
Revision *1854477*
<http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1854477> - (view
<http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/spamassassin/trunk/rules/active.list?revision=1854477&view=markup>)
(download
<http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/spamassassin/trunk/rules/active.list?revision=1854477&view=co>)
(annotate
<http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/spamassassin/trunk/rules/active.list?annotate=1854477>)
- [select for diffs]
<http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/spamassassin/trunk/rules/active.list?view=log&r1=1854477>
Modified /Wed Feb 27 18:16:20 2019 UTC/ (2 months ago) by /gbechis/
File length: 15052 byte(s)
Diff to previous 1854447
<http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/spamassassin/trunk/rules/active.list?r1=1854447&r2=1854477>
(colored
<http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/spamassassin/trunk/rules/active.list?r1=1854447&r2=1854477&diff_format=h>)
Switch to https and fix some 404 errors
bz #7652
The second issue is a continuing one and that is committers submitting
without 'make test' first. This occurred in January when I tried to
build the last release. If the svn for trunk including rules is broken,
it will break masscheck, etc. We are currently passing again so just a
friendly reminder. It takes a village to stop a spammer :-)
So now, what I see in the logs is that the commit didn't occur but
there is no error, nothing. Checking
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/spamassassin/trunk/rules/active.list?view=log
concurs:
5/5 (note that Committing promotions is NOT followed by an svn commit)
+ echo 'Committing promotions in rules/active.list...'
+ svn commit -m 'promotions validated' rules/active.list
Committing promotions in rules/active.list...
+ /usr/bin/perl masses/rule-qa/list-bad-rules
5/4 (example where the commit worked)
+ echo 'Committing promotions in rules/active.list...'
Committing promotions in rules/active.list...
+ svn commit -m 'promotions validated' rules/active.list
Sending rules/active.list
Transmitting file data .done
Committing transaction...
Committed revision 1858595.
I'm out of time to keep pursuing this but hoping someone else can look
at it.
Regards,
KAM
Re: /tags nightly commits
Posted by "Kevin A. McGrail" <km...@apache.org>.
Resending with correct dev list :-)
On 5/5/2019 6:10 AM, Paul Stead wrote:
> Promotions and tags still seem to be a little problematic at the moment. A
> run of build/mkupdates/listpromotable locally shows +300 lines difference
> to active.list over the one being submitted.
Before I deal with this issue:
+Dev.
TL;DR: REMINDER: PLEASE use a make test on your local checkout before
committing!
We had two issues. It appears an svn commit failed on a release and
that left cruft that was colliding for commit. That issue was caused by
a manual edit to active.list:
Revision *1854477*
<http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1854477> - (view
<http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/spamassassin/trunk/rules/active.list?revision=1854477&view=markup>)
(download
<http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/spamassassin/trunk/rules/active.list?revision=1854477&view=co>)
(annotate
<http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/spamassassin/trunk/rules/active.list?annotate=1854477>)
- [select for diffs]
<http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/spamassassin/trunk/rules/active.list?view=log&r1=1854477>
Modified /Wed Feb 27 18:16:20 2019 UTC/ (2 months ago) by /gbechis/
File length: 15052 byte(s)
Diff to previous 1854447
<http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/spamassassin/trunk/rules/active.list?r1=1854447&r2=1854477>
(colored
<http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/spamassassin/trunk/rules/active.list?r1=1854447&r2=1854477&diff_format=h>)
Switch to https and fix some 404 errors
bz #7652
The second issue is a continuing one and that is committers submitting
without 'make test' first. This occurred in January when I tried to
build the last release. If the svn for trunk including rules is broken,
it will break masscheck, etc. We are currently passing again so just a
friendly reminder. It takes a village to stop a spammer :-)
So now, what I see in the logs is that the commit didn't occur but
there is no error, nothing. Checking
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/spamassassin/trunk/rules/active.list?view=log
concurs:
5/5 (note that Committing promotions is NOT followed by an svn commit)
+ echo 'Committing promotions in rules/active.list...'
+ svn commit -m 'promotions validated' rules/active.list
Committing promotions in rules/active.list...
+ /usr/bin/perl masses/rule-qa/list-bad-rules
5/4 (example where the commit worked)
+ echo 'Committing promotions in rules/active.list...'
Committing promotions in rules/active.list...
+ svn commit -m 'promotions validated' rules/active.list
Sending rules/active.list
Transmitting file data .done
Committing transaction...
Committed revision 1858595.
I'm out of time to keep pursuing this but hoping someone else can look
at it.
Regards,
KAM
Re: /tags nightly commits
Posted by "Kevin A. McGrail" <km...@apache.org>.
Resending with correct dev list :-)
On 5/5/2019 6:10 AM, Paul Stead wrote:
> Promotions and tags still seem to be a little problematic at the moment. A
> run of build/mkupdates/listpromotable locally shows +300 lines difference
> to active.list over the one being submitted.
Before I deal with this issue:
+Dev.
TL;DR: REMINDER: PLEASE use a make test on your local checkout before
committing!
We had two issues. It appears an svn commit failed on a release and
that left cruft that was colliding for commit. That issue was caused by
a manual edit to active.list:
Revision *1854477*
<http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1854477> - (view
<http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/spamassassin/trunk/rules/active.list?revision=1854477&view=markup>)
(download
<http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/spamassassin/trunk/rules/active.list?revision=1854477&view=co>)
(annotate
<http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/spamassassin/trunk/rules/active.list?annotate=1854477>)
- [select for diffs]
<http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/spamassassin/trunk/rules/active.list?view=log&r1=1854477>
Modified /Wed Feb 27 18:16:20 2019 UTC/ (2 months ago) by /gbechis/
File length: 15052 byte(s)
Diff to previous 1854447
<http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/spamassassin/trunk/rules/active.list?r1=1854447&r2=1854477>
(colored
<http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/spamassassin/trunk/rules/active.list?r1=1854447&r2=1854477&diff_format=h>)
Switch to https and fix some 404 errors
bz #7652
The second issue is a continuing one and that is committers submitting
without 'make test' first. This occurred in January when I tried to
build the last release. If the svn for trunk including rules is broken,
it will break masscheck, etc. We are currently passing again so just a
friendly reminder. It takes a village to stop a spammer :-)
So now, what I see in the logs is that the commit didn't occur but
there is no error, nothing. Checking
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/spamassassin/trunk/rules/active.list?view=log
concurs:
5/5 (note that Committing promotions is NOT followed by an svn commit)
+ echo 'Committing promotions in rules/active.list...'
+ svn commit -m 'promotions validated' rules/active.list
Committing promotions in rules/active.list...
+ /usr/bin/perl masses/rule-qa/list-bad-rules
5/4 (example where the commit worked)
+ echo 'Committing promotions in rules/active.list...'
Committing promotions in rules/active.list...
+ svn commit -m 'promotions validated' rules/active.list
Sending rules/active.list
Transmitting file data .done
Committing transaction...
Committed revision 1858595.
I'm out of time to keep pursuing this but hoping someone else can look
at it.
Regards,
KAM