You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@hbase.apache.org by "Nick Dimiduk (Jira)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2020/07/21 17:39:00 UTC

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-24750) All executor service should start using our internal ThreadFactory

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-24750?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17162206#comment-17162206 ] 

Nick Dimiduk commented on HBASE-24750:
--------------------------------------

I wonder if instead we should retire our own and use Guava's. The best code is code we don't have to maintain, and this seems like something better suited for a 3rd party utility library.

> All executor service should start using our internal ThreadFactory
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-24750
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-24750
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: Viraj Jasani
>            Priority: Major
>
> Currently, we have majority Executor services using guava's ThreadFactoryBuilder while creating fixed size thread pool. There are some executors using our internal hbase-common's Threads class which provides util methods for creating thread factory.
> Although there is no perf impact, we should let all Executors start using our internal library for using ThreadFactory rather than having external guava dependency (which is nothing more than a builder class). We might have to add a couple more arguments to support full fledged ThreadFactory, but let's do it and stop using guava's builder class.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)