You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@geronimo.apache.org by Vamsavardhana Reddy <c1...@gmail.com> on 2008/02/10 08:44:05 UTC
What happened to geronimo-javamail_1.4 "current" codebase?
I see geronimo-javamail_1.4-xx only under tags. Isn't there supposed to be
a current codebase either under trunk or under branches??
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/javamail/
++Vamsi
Re: What happened to geronimo-javamail_1.4 "current" codebase?
Posted by Vamsavardhana Reddy <c1...@gmail.com>.
Thank you Rick. Now I know from where I can reinstate a new trunk from
javamail.
++Vamsi
On Feb 11, 2008 4:15 PM, Rick McGuire <ri...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I've sort of been following the process used by the specs with the
> javamail code of deleting the trunk version when a new release is
> created. Once it's determined that new development or fixes need to be
> made, the latest tag version should be copied back to the trunk (and the
> poms updated accordingly).
>
> Rick
>
> Vamsavardhana Reddy wrote:
> > Rev 600621 http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&revision=600621
> > <http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&revision=600621>
> > geronimo/javamail/trunk/geronimo-javamail_1.4/ has been "moved"
> > togeronimo/javamail/branches/geronimo-javamail_1.4-1.3/ . I though we
> > copy when we want to branch. I think we should reinstate trunk by
> > copying from rev 600620.
> > //
> > ++Vamsi
> >
> > On Feb 10, 2008 1:14 PM, Vamsavardhana Reddy <c1vamsi1c@gmail.com
> > <ma...@gmail.com>> wrote:
> >
> > I see geronimo-javamail_1.4-xx only under tags. Isn't there
> > supposed to be a current codebase either under trunk or under
> > branches??
> >
> > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/javamail/
> >
> > ++Vamsi
> >
> >
>
>
Re: What happened to geronimo-javamail_1.4 "current" codebase?
Posted by Rick McGuire <ri...@gmail.com>.
I've sort of been following the process used by the specs with the
javamail code of deleting the trunk version when a new release is
created. Once it's determined that new development or fixes need to be
made, the latest tag version should be copied back to the trunk (and the
poms updated accordingly).
Rick
Vamsavardhana Reddy wrote:
> Rev 600621 http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&revision=600621
> <http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&revision=600621>
> geronimo/javamail/trunk/geronimo-javamail_1.4/ has been "moved"
> togeronimo/javamail/branches/geronimo-javamail_1.4-1.3/ . I though we
> copy when we want to branch. I think we should reinstate trunk by
> copying from rev 600620.
> //
> ++Vamsi
>
> On Feb 10, 2008 1:14 PM, Vamsavardhana Reddy <c1vamsi1c@gmail.com
> <ma...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> I see geronimo-javamail_1.4-xx only under tags. Isn't there
> supposed to be a current codebase either under trunk or under
> branches??
>
> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/javamail/
>
> ++Vamsi
>
>
Re: What happened to geronimo-javamail_1.4 "current" codebase?
Posted by Vamsavardhana Reddy <c1...@gmail.com>.
Rev 600621 http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&revision=600621
geronimo/javamail/trunk/geronimo-javamail_1.4/ has been "moved"
togeronimo/javamail/branches/geronimo-javamail_1.4-1.3/ . I though we copy
when we want to branch. I think we should reinstate trunk by copying from
rev 600620.
**
++Vamsi
On Feb 10, 2008 1:14 PM, Vamsavardhana Reddy <c1...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I see geronimo-javamail_1.4-xx only under tags. Isn't there supposed to
> be a current codebase either under trunk or under branches??
>
> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/javamail/
>
> ++Vamsi
>