You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@trafficserver.apache.org by Michael Turner <jm...@apple.com> on 2012/04/29 21:23:26 UTC
3.1.3 in prod?
Hi all,
Are there any known showstoppers at this point with 3.1.3 in production? Is anybody using that on a "busy" site? What are results like?
Thanks,
Mikey
Re: 3.1.3 in prod?
Posted by Michael Turner <jm...@apple.com>.
On Apr 29, 2012, at 6:04 PM, Leif Hedstrom wrote:
>
> It's possible to get the 3.1.3 plugins to compile with 3.0.4, it's a bit painful though. Did you try building with 3.1.3 or trunk, and run with 3.0.4?
Yeah, I pulled down the 3.1.3 sources, ran configure in the base dir, then made the plugins and copied them over to the 3.0.4 machine and set them up. Didn't work, and we thought at the time that it was causing a core dump, though now I'm not so sure that was the cause. We've had a lot of segfaults today with 3.1.3, and it was late when I was trying the plugins on 3.0.4 last night.
Mikey
Re: 3.1.3 in prod?
Posted by Michael Turner <jm...@apple.com>.
On Apr 29, 2012, at 6:25 PM, Leif Hedstrom wrote:
>
> The cache in 3.1.x is not compatible with 3.0.4, and must be reinitialized. Not saying that's your problem, but worth a shot. I don't know if that assert is something we've seen before, worth checking the Jira bugs list, and if not, file a bug please.
Filed at https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TS-1233 with our initial findings, and I'll add details as we continue to try to reproduce.
Mikey
Re: 3.1.3 in prod?
Posted by Michael Turner <jm...@apple.com>.
We've seen it on both, and on a nearly created raw cache. I don't think we ever saw this with 3.0.4.
On Apr 29, 2012, at 6:25 PM, Leif Hedstrom wrote:
> On 4/29/12 7:08 PM, Bruce Lysik wrote:
>> We're seeing a fairly frequent crash in our 3.1.3 installation, which always results in a corruption to the disk cache.
>
> Are you using a raw disk cache, or on the FS? And you don't see this with 3.0.4 ? One thing to try, to be sure, is to make a complete clean start of the cache, particularly if you upgraded from 3.0.4 to 3.1.3. E.g.
>
> sudo traffic_server -Cclear
>
>
> The cache in 3.1.x is not compatible with 3.0.4, and must be reinitialized. Not saying that's your problem, but worth a shot. I don't know if that assert is something we've seen before, worth checking the Jira bugs list, and if not, file a bug please.
>
> -- Leif
>
Re: 3.1.3 in prod?
Posted by Leif Hedstrom <zw...@apache.org>.
On 4/29/12 7:08 PM, Bruce Lysik wrote:
> We're seeing a fairly frequent crash in our 3.1.3 installation, which always results in a corruption to the disk cache.
Are you using a raw disk cache, or on the FS? And you don't see this with
3.0.4 ? One thing to try, to be sure, is to make a complete clean start of
the cache, particularly if you upgraded from 3.0.4 to 3.1.3. E.g.
sudo traffic_server -Cclear
The cache in 3.1.x is not compatible with 3.0.4, and must be reinitialized.
Not saying that's your problem, but worth a shot. I don't know if that
assert is something we've seen before, worth checking the Jira bugs list,
and if not, file a bug please.
-- Leif
Re: 3.1.3 in prod?
Posted by Bruce Lysik <bl...@yahoo.com>.
We're seeing a fairly frequent crash in our 3.1.3 installation, which always results in a corruption to the disk cache.
FATAL: HttpSM.cc:890: failed assert `0`
/usr/bin/traffic_server - STACK TRACE:
/usr/lib64/trafficserver/libtsutil.so.3(ink_fatal+0x88)[0x2b3b69c88538]
/usr/lib64/trafficserver/libtsutil.so.3(_ink_assert+0x1f)[0x2b3b69c86c6f]
/usr/bin/traffic_server(_ZN6HttpSM28state_watch_for_client_abortEiPv+0x7d)[0x52ae0d]
/usr/bin/traffic_server(_ZN6HttpSM12main_handlerEiPv+0xe8)[0x536008]
/usr/bin/traffic_server(_ZN18UnixNetVConnection14readSignalDoneEiP10NetHandler+0x3d)[0x678e2d]
/usr/bin/traffic_server(_ZN17SSLNetVConnection11net_read_ioEP10NetHandlerP7EThread+0x6ef)[0x66cabf]
/usr/bin/traffic_server(_ZN10NetHandler12mainNetEventEiP5Event+0x25a)[0x6737ba]
/usr/bin/traffic_server(_ZN7EThread13process_eventEP5Eventi+0xb4)[0x69cc34]
/usr/bin/traffic_server(_ZN7EThread7executeEv+0x4c3)[0x69d5c3]
/usr/bin/traffic_server[0x69bb72]
/lib64/libpthread.so.0[0x3170e077f1]
/lib64/libc.so.6(clone+0x6d)[0x3170ae570d]
--
Bruce Z. Lysik <bl...@yahoo.com>
----- Original Message -----
> From: Leif Hedstrom <zw...@apache.org>
> To: "users@trafficserver.apache.org" <us...@trafficserver.apache.org>
> Cc: "users@trafficserver.apache.org" <us...@trafficserver.apache.org>
> Sent: Sunday, April 29, 2012 6:04 PM
> Subject: Re: 3.1.3 in prod?
>
> On Apr 29, 2012, at 1:23 PM, Michael Turner <jm...@apple.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Are there any known showstoppers at this point with 3.1.3 in production?
> Is anybody using that on a "busy" site? What are results like?
>
>
> My personal opinion is that 3.1.3 is more stable than 3.0.4, and superior
> features and performance.
>
> 3.1.4 should come soon, I hope, and then 3.2 in the not too distant future.
>
> It's possible to get the 3.1.3 plugins to compile with 3.0.4, it's a bit
> painful though. Did you try building with 3.1.3 or trunk, and run with 3.0.4?
>
> -- Leif
>
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Mikey
>>
>
Re: 3.1.3 in prod?
Posted by Leif Hedstrom <zw...@apache.org>.
On Apr 29, 2012, at 1:23 PM, Michael Turner <jm...@apple.com> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Are there any known showstoppers at this point with 3.1.3 in production? Is anybody using that on a "busy" site? What are results like?
My personal opinion is that 3.1.3 is more stable than 3.0.4, and superior features and performance.
3.1.4 should come soon, I hope, and then 3.2 in the not too distant future.
It's possible to get the 3.1.3 plugins to compile with 3.0.4, it's a bit painful though. Did you try building with 3.1.3 or trunk, and run with 3.0.4?
-- Leif
>
> Thanks,
>
> Mikey
>
Re: 3.1.3 in prod?
Posted by Bruce Lysik <bl...@yahoo.com>.
Also, is it possible to get the plugins in 3.1.3 to run in 3.0.4 ?
--
Bruce Z. Lysik <bl...@yahoo.com>
----- Original Message -----
> From: Michael Turner <jm...@apple.com>
> To: users@trafficserver.apache.org
> Cc:
> Sent: Sunday, April 29, 2012 12:23 PM
> Subject: 3.1.3 in prod?
>
> Hi all,
>
> Are there any known showstoppers at this point with 3.1.3 in production? Is
> anybody using that on a "busy" site? What are results like?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Mikey
>