You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@sqoop.apache.org by "Jarek Jarcec Cecho (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2012/12/04 02:49:58 UTC

[jira] [Commented] (SQOOP-722) Improve Sqoop 2 packaging

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SQOOP-722?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13509424#comment-13509424 ] 

Jarek Jarcec Cecho commented on SQOOP-722:
------------------------------------------

I've removed first proposed suggestion from the patch per Abhijeet's -1.
                
> Improve Sqoop 2 packaging
> -------------------------
>
>                 Key: SQOOP-722
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SQOOP-722
>             Project: Sqoop
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>    Affects Versions: 2.0.0
>            Reporter: Jarek Jarcec Cecho
>            Assignee: Jarek Jarcec Cecho
>             Fix For: 2.0.0
>
>         Attachments: bugSQOOP-722.patch, bugSQOOP-722.patch
>
>
> I would like to propose two improvements to current building (dist module):
> * Build both source and binary artifacts at the same time. As as I understand a lot of other projects are doing that as well and it seems more friendly than creating one package at the time.
> * Encode hadoop profile into binary artifact name. I believe that we should encode for which Hadoop version is given binary artifact suitable. I know that only two jars are actually "hadoop specific" whereas the others will work across all hadoop distributions, but I believe that it will be more user friendly.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira