You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@httpd.apache.org by rb...@covalent.net on 2000/04/28 20:04:02 UTC
Who has NT with SP4?
Could somebody with NT SP4 test bug #38 from the bugzilla bug DB. I have
tested this bug with 2000, and it doesn't exist there, but it could be an
NT issue. I am trying VERY hard to keep the bugzilla bugDB relatively
clean, and this issue has been open for a while. I expect a bunch of
new bugs since we just released another alpha.
If the bug doesn't exist, please the report, if it does, let's fix
it. :-)
Ryan
_______________________________________________________________________________
Ryan Bloom rbb@apache.org
406 29th St.
San Francisco, CA 94131
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
RE: Who has NT with SP4?
Posted by "William A. Rowe, Jr." <wr...@lnd.com>.
My bugdb access doesn't exist
Refer to apache-2.0\htdocs\manual\windows.html for Requirements.
SP2/SP4 were both -bad- service packs. Advise them to uninstall
and reinstall the service -after- upgrading to a4/sp5.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: rbb@covalent.net [mailto:rbb@covalent.net]
> Sent: Friday, April 28, 2000 1:04 PM
> To: new-httpd@apache.org
> Subject: Who has NT with SP4?
>
>
>
> Could somebody with NT SP4 test bug #38 from the bugzilla bug
> DB. I have
> tested this bug with 2000, and it doesn't exist there, but it
> could be an
> NT issue. I am trying VERY hard to keep the bugzilla bugDB relatively
> clean, and this issue has been open for a while. I expect a bunch of
> new bugs since we just released another alpha.
>
> If the bug doesn't exist, please the report, if it does, let's fix
> it. :-)
>
> Ryan
>
>
> ______________________________________________________________
> _________________
> Ryan Bloom rbb@apache.org
> 406 29th St.
> San Francisco, CA 94131
> --------------------------------------------------------------
> -----------------
>
RE: Speaking of bugs
Posted by rb...@covalent.net.
Yep, that's a problem. There was a link when we first released 2.0a1, I
guess it got blown away at some point. I put it back now.
Ryan
On Fri, 28 Apr 2000, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
> There seems to be no link between GNATS http://bugs.apache.org/
> to get over to bugzilla if the report is a 2.0a problem.
>
> I'd memorized bugs.apache.org, I would guess others have too,
> and don't know to look elsewhere.
>
_______________________________________________________________________________
Ryan Bloom rbb@apache.org
406 29th St.
San Francisco, CA 94131
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
RE: Speaking of bugs
Posted by rb...@covalent.net.
Okay, I tried to add a link to the GNAT's bug DB, but I don't have access
to write to the file. Could somebody else PLEASE add a link to the 2.0
bug DB?
Thanks,
Ryan
On Fri, 28 Apr 2000, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
> There seems to be no link between GNATS http://bugs.apache.org/
> to get over to bugzilla if the report is a 2.0a problem.
>
> I'd memorized bugs.apache.org, I would guess others have too,
> and don't know to look elsewhere.
>
_______________________________________________________________________________
Ryan Bloom rbb@apache.org
406 29th St.
San Francisco, CA 94131
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
RE: Speaking of bugs
Posted by "William A. Rowe, Jr." <wr...@lnd.com>.
There seems to be no link between GNATS http://bugs.apache.org/
to get over to bugzilla if the report is a 2.0a problem.
I'd memorized bugs.apache.org, I would guess others have too,
and don't know to look elsewhere.