You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@parquet.apache.org by "Yash Datta (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2014/11/08 15:54:33 UTC

[jira] [Updated] (PARQUET-128) Optimize the parquet RecordReader implementation when: A. filterpredicate is pushed down , B. filterpredicate is pushed down on a flat schema

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PARQUET-128?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Yash Datta updated PARQUET-128:
-------------------------------
    Summary: Optimize the parquet RecordReader implementation when:  A. filterpredicate is pushed down , B. filterpredicate is pushed down on a flat schema   (was: Optimize the parquet RecordReader implementation when A. filterpredicate is pushed down , B. filterpredicate is pushed down on a flat schema )

> Optimize the parquet RecordReader implementation when:  A. filterpredicate is pushed down , B. filterpredicate is pushed down on a flat schema 
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: PARQUET-128
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PARQUET-128
>             Project: Parquet
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: parquet-mr
>    Affects Versions: 1.6.0rc2
>            Reporter: Yash Datta
>             Fix For: parquet-mr_1.6.0
>
>
> The RecordReader implementation currently will read all the columns before applying the filter predicate and deciding whether to keep the row or discard it.
> We can have a RecordReader which will only assemble the columns on which filters are applied (which are usually a few), then apply the filter and decide whether to keep the row or not , and then goes on to assemble the remaining columns or skip the remaining columns accordingly.
> The performance improvement by this change is seen to be significant , and is better in case smaller number of rows are returned by filtering (which is usually the case) and there are many number of columns



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)