Re: Suggestions for secure pages without screen classes? - bug fi nding Default.java?

[Gedin Frederic <fr...@jaluna.com>]

Gaasch, Derek wrote:

>Thanks for the reply. That is indeed what I need to do. I had been having
>trouble with Default.java & just discovered why.... I have my source divided
>up into multiple folders like the following to allow for a little easier
>separation of the different pieces of the site:
>
>Org.co.web
>|
>|----modules
>|    |----actions
>|    |----screens
>|
>|----admin
>|    |----actions
>|    |----screens
>|
>|----staff
>|    |----actions
>|    |----screens
>
>
>However, apparently Turbine only looks for Default.java files in the
>"modules" directory. I tried puting Default.java in staff.screens.staff,
>staff.screens, and staff subdirectories but none worked. When I put
>Default.java in modules.screens.staff, Things worked as expected. 
>
>So, problem solved (I'll just put the default.java files in subdirectories
>of the modules dir), but shouldn't the staff subdirectories work as well?
>Them not doing so kind of screws up my attempt at fully partitioning the
>different applications.
>
>-d
>  
>
The module.packages parameter in TurbineResources.properties should 
allow you to specify an other place to look for screen ans action push 
classes.

Frédéric




---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: turbine-user-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: turbine-user-help@jakarta.apache.org