You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@openoffice.apache.org by Yan Ji <ya...@gmail.com> on 2012/06/27 07:42:26 UTC

[RELEASE][3.4.1]Need review AOO 3.4.1 release blocker defect

I went through bugzilla defects with flag set 3.4.1_release_blocker?[1]. Totally 13 defects have this flag. As reviewed I thought following three defects are not really blocker issue. 

Bug 119272 https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=119272
Bug 119525 https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=119525
Bug 120048 https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=120048

Can someone review the defect list?


[1]https://issues.apache.org/ooo/buglist.cgi?f1=flagtypes.name&list_id=17075&o1=equals&o2=notequals&query_format=advanced&f2=resolution&v1=3.4.1_release_blocker%3F&v2=DUPLICATE

Thanks & Best Regards, Yan Ji

Re: [RELEASE][3.4.1]Need review AOO 3.4.1 release blocker defect

Posted by Jürgen Schmidt <jo...@googlemail.com>.
On 6/27/12 10:44 AM, Andre Fischer wrote:
> On 27.06.2012 09:28, Herbert Duerr wrote:
>> On 27.06.2012 09:06, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
>>> On 6/27/12 7:42 AM, Yan Ji wrote:
>>>> I went through bugzilla defects with flag set
>>>> 3.4.1_release_blocker?[1]. Totally 13 defects have this flag. As
>>>> reviewed I thought following three defects are not really blocker
>>>> issue.
>>>>
>>>> Bug 119272 https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=119272
>>>
>>> I think this issue is valid for 3.4.1 because it will save a lot of
>>> space and will clean up the mass.
>>
>> IMHO the urgency of the summary bug has been reduced because the
>> important sub-problem of this task has already been fixed by Andre in
>> https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=120082 That issue is
>> already on the 3.4.1 track.
> 
> Exactly.  Issue 119272 is caused by three different problems.  Issue
> 120082 describes one of them.  Its fix reduces the space consumption by
> factor 2.
> 
> Issue 120033 describes the second problem (several extensions bringing
> large thesaurus files).  I will propose this for 3.4.1 as soon as the
> lazy consensus deadline expires (about 24h to go) and nobody vetos it.
> Its fix will reduce the space consumption by factor 4.
> 
> The remaining problem is harder to fix (install extensions with
> admin/super user access rights).  Nothing for a 3.4.1.

ok, that means I will remove the release blocker flag from 119272 and
will add it to 120033 and 120082.

Juergen

Re: [RELEASE][3.4.1]Need review AOO 3.4.1 release blocker defect

Posted by Andre Fischer <af...@a-w-f.de>.
On 27.06.2012 09:28, Herbert Duerr wrote:
> On 27.06.2012 09:06, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
>> On 6/27/12 7:42 AM, Yan Ji wrote:
>>> I went through bugzilla defects with flag set
>>> 3.4.1_release_blocker?[1]. Totally 13 defects have this flag. As
>>> reviewed I thought following three defects are not really blocker issue.
>>>
>>> Bug 119272 https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=119272
>>
>> I think this issue is valid for 3.4.1 because it will save a lot of
>> space and will clean up the mass.
>
> IMHO the urgency of the summary bug has been reduced because the
> important sub-problem of this task has already been fixed by Andre in
> https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=120082 That issue is
> already on the 3.4.1 track.

Exactly.  Issue 119272 is caused by three different problems.  Issue 
120082 describes one of them.  Its fix reduces the space consumption by 
factor 2.

Issue 120033 describes the second problem (several extensions bringing 
large thesaurus files).  I will propose this for 3.4.1 as soon as the 
lazy consensus deadline expires (about 24h to go) and nobody vetos it.
Its fix will reduce the space consumption by factor 4.

The remaining problem is harder to fix (install extensions with 
admin/super user access rights).  Nothing for a 3.4.1.

-Andre

Re: [RELEASE][3.4.1]Need review AOO 3.4.1 release blocker defect

Posted by Herbert Duerr <hd...@apache.org>.
On 27.06.2012 09:06, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
> On 6/27/12 7:42 AM, Yan Ji wrote:
>> I went through bugzilla defects with flag set 3.4.1_release_blocker?[1]. Totally 13 defects have this flag. As reviewed I thought following three defects are not really blocker issue.
>>
>> Bug 119272 https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=119272
>
> I think this issue is valid for 3.4.1 because it will save a lot of
> space and will clean up the mass.

IMHO the urgency of the summary bug has been reduced because the 
important sub-problem of this task has already been fixed by Andre in 
https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=120082 That issue is 
already on the 3.4.1 track.

Herbert

Re: [RELEASE][3.4.1]Need review AOO 3.4.1 release blocker defect

Posted by Jürgen Schmidt <jo...@googlemail.com>.
On 6/27/12 7:42 AM, Yan Ji wrote:
> I went through bugzilla defects with flag set 3.4.1_release_blocker?[1]. Totally 13 defects have this flag. As reviewed I thought following three defects are not really blocker issue. 
> 
> Bug 119272 https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=119272

I think this issue is valid for 3.4.1 because it will save a lot of
space and will clean up the mass.

> Bug 119525 https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=119525

I think this issue is invalid regarding the subject and can be closed.
It is an issue with an extension that isn't under our control.

> Bug 120048 https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=120048

well a fix is available and it seems to be a regression in some way.
>From my pint of view we can fix it.

Juergen

> 
> Can someone review the defect list?
> 
> 
> [1]https://issues.apache.org/ooo/buglist.cgi?f1=flagtypes.name&list_id=17075&o1=equals&o2=notequals&query_format=advanced&f2=resolution&v1=3.4.1_release_blocker%3F&v2=DUPLICATE
> 
> Thanks & Best Regards, Yan Ji
> 
>