You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@httpd.apache.org by Manoj Kasichainula <ma...@io.com> on 2000/03/08 03:20:03 UTC
make depend not set up for 2.0 yet?
Am I correct that there is no dependency checking support in the 2.0
tree right now? Any objection to just using the code that APR (and I
believe 1.3) uses?
BTW, David Reid's prefix problem is due to "make clean" not removing
the "apaci" script. A fix will be in CVS when I get in my hotel.
Re: make depend not set up for 2.0 yet?
Posted by Manoj Kasichainula <ma...@io.com>.
On Wed, Mar 08, 2000 at 07:33:50AM +0100, Sascha Schumann wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 07, 2000 at 06:20:03PM -0800, Manoj Kasichainula wrote:
> > Am I correct that there is no dependency checking support in the 2.0
> > tree right now?
>
> Just run make depend. Or does it not work for you?
Sorry. Yeah, I found this later on the plane. I should have gone
through and cleaned out the messages in my postfix queue that were no
longer applicable. :)
Re: make depend not set up for 2.0 yet?
Posted by Sascha Schumann <sa...@schumann.cx>.
On Tue, Mar 07, 2000 at 06:20:03PM -0800, Manoj Kasichainula wrote:
> Am I correct that there is no dependency checking support in the 2.0
> tree right now?
Just run make depend. Or does it not work for you?
- Sascha
Re: make depend not set up for 2.0 yet?
Posted by David Reid <dr...@jetnet.co.uk>.
Thanks Manoj.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Manoj Kasichainula" <ma...@io.com>
To: "Apache Developers" <ne...@apache.org>
Sent: Wednesday, March 08, 2000 2:20 AM
Subject: make depend not set up for 2.0 yet?
> Am I correct that there is no dependency checking support in the 2.0
> tree right now? Any objection to just using the code that APR (and I
> believe 1.3) uses?
>
> BTW, David Reid's prefix problem is due to "make clean" not removing
> the "apaci" script. A fix will be in CVS when I get in my hotel.
>
>