You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@ignite.apache.org by "Maxim Muzafarov (Jira)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2021/01/25 16:41:00 UTC

[jira] [Commented] (IGNITE-12779) Split implementations of Ignite and IgniteMXBean, make behavior of their active(boolean) different

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12779?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17271511#comment-17271511 ] 

Maxim Muzafarov commented on IGNITE-12779:
------------------------------------------

[~NSAmelchev]

Can you proceed with the merge?

> Split implementations of Ignite and IgniteMXBean, make behavior of their active(boolean) different 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: IGNITE-12779
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12779
>             Project: Ignite
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>    Affects Versions: 2.8
>            Reporter: Vladimir Steshin
>            Assignee: Vladimir Steshin
>            Priority: Major
>             Fix For: 2.10
>
>          Time Spent: 3h 20m
>  Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> To make cluster deactivation through JMX without sudden erasure of in-memory data we should:
> 1) Set IgniteMXBean.active(false) and IgniteMXBean.state("inactive") throwing an exception if deactivation would clear in-memory data.
> 2) Extract IgniteMXBean from IgniteKernal.
> 3) Add IgniteMXBean.state(String, boolean)
> Additionally, as discussed, we should improve comments
> {code:java}
> /** If {@code true}, cluster deactivation will be forced. */
> {code}
> Let's add a link to a full description.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)