You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@drill.apache.org by "Prasad Nagaraj Subramanya (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2017/10/16 21:34:00 UTC
[jira] [Created] (DRILL-5880) java.sql.SQLException:
UNSUPPORTED_OPERATION ERROR: This query cannot be planned possibly due to
either a cartesian join or an inequality join
Prasad Nagaraj Subramanya created DRILL-5880:
------------------------------------------------
Summary: java.sql.SQLException: UNSUPPORTED_OPERATION ERROR: This query cannot be planned possibly due to either a cartesian join or an inequality join
Key: DRILL-5880
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DRILL-5880
Project: Apache Drill
Issue Type: Bug
Components: Execution - Relational Operators
Affects Versions: 1.11.0
Reporter: Prasad Nagaraj Subramanya
Consider the below query
{code}
select region.sales_region as c0, region_1.sales_region as c1, sum(sales_fact_1997.unit_sales) as m0 from region as region, store as store, sales_fact_1997 as sales_fact_1997, region as region_1, customer as customer where sales_fact_1997.store_id = store.store_id and store.region_id = region.region_id and region.sales_region = 'South West' and sales_fact_1997.customer_id = customer.customer_id and customer.customer_region_id = region_1.region_id and region_1.sales_region = 'South West' group by region.sales_region, region_1.sales_region
{code}
The query fails with the following error-
{code}
(org.apache.drill.exec.work.foreman.UnsupportedRelOperatorException) This query cannot be planned possibly due to either a cartesian join or an inequality join
org.apache.drill.exec.planner.sql.handlers.DefaultSqlHandler.convertToPrel():437
org.apache.drill.exec.planner.sql.handlers.DefaultSqlHandler.getPlan():169
org.apache.drill.exec.planner.sql.DrillSqlWorker.getQueryPlan():131
org.apache.drill.exec.planner.sql.DrillSqlWorker.getPlan():79
org.apache.drill.exec.work.foreman.Foreman.runSQL():991
org.apache.drill.exec.work.foreman.Foreman.run():276
java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker():1145
java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run():615
java.lang.Thread.run():744
{code}
This is a regression. It worked with drill 1.10.0
Having a single alias of the table region in the above query works fine.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)