You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@openoffice.apache.org by bu...@apache.org on 2012/07/14 23:46:59 UTC

3.4.1_release_blocker requested: [Bug 120278] Database field NEXT RECORD fails in default configuration

Ariel Constenla-Haile <ar...@apache.org> has asked  for
3.4.1_release_blocker:
Bug 120278: Database field NEXT RECORD fails in default configuration
https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=120278


------- Additional Comments from Ariel Constenla-Haile <ar...@apache.org>
Requesting release blocker status, so that the fix can be included in AOO 3.4.1


The fix is trivial and low risk.

Re: 3.4.1_release_blocker requested: [Bug 120278] Database field NEXT RECORD fails in default configuration

Posted by Zhe Liu <al...@gmail.com>.
+1

2012/7/15  <bu...@apache.org>:
> Ariel Constenla-Haile <ar...@apache.org> has asked  for
> 3.4.1_release_blocker:
> Bug 120278: Database field NEXT RECORD fails in default configuration
> https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=120278
>
>
> ------- Additional Comments from Ariel Constenla-Haile <ar...@apache.org>
> Requesting release blocker status, so that the fix can be included in AOO 3.4.1
>
>
> The fix is trivial and low risk.



-- 
Best Regards
>From aliuzhe@gmail.com

Re: 3.4.1_release_blocker requested: [Bug 120278] Database field NEXT RECORD fails in default configuration

Posted by Jürgen Schmidt <jo...@googlemail.com>.
On 7/14/12 11:46 PM, bugzilla@apache.org wrote:
> Ariel Constenla-Haile <ar...@apache.org> has asked  for
> 3.4.1_release_blocker:
> Bug 120278: Database field NEXT RECORD fails in default configuration
> https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=120278
> 
> 
> ------- Additional Comments from Ariel Constenla-Haile <ar...@apache.org>
> Requesting release blocker status, so that the fix can be included in AOO 3.4.1
> 
> 
> The fix is trivial and low risk.
> 


+1, it's a regression


Juergen

Re: 3.4.1_release_blocker requested: [Bug 120278] Database field NEXT RECORD fails in default configuration

Posted by Oliver-Rainer Wittmann <or...@googlemail.com>.
+1

Best regards, Oliver

On 14.07.2012 23:46, bugzilla@apache.org wrote:
> Ariel Constenla-Haile <ar...@apache.org> has asked  for
> 3.4.1_release_blocker:
> Bug 120278: Database field NEXT RECORD fails in default configuration
> https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=120278
>
>
> ------- Additional Comments from Ariel Constenla-Haile <ar...@apache.org>
> Requesting release blocker status, so that the fix can be included in AOO 3.4.1
>
>
> The fix is trivial and low risk.
>