[VOTE] Airflow Providers prepared on December 1st, 2022 (RC1)

[Jarek Potiuk <ja...@potiuk.com>]

Hey all,

I have just cut the new wave Airflow Providers packages. This email is
calling a vote on the release,
which will last for 24 hours - which means that it will end on
Thursday, 2nd of Dec 2022, 4.30 PM CET.

This release is accelerated - because those providers are needed for
2.5.0 release and RC3 release will be accelerated as well (after
RC1/RC2) and we would like to release the providers before, so that
Airflow 2.5 makes use of them.

Consider this my (binding) +1.

There are fixes to Snowflake providers (bugs were found in 4.0.0 and
4.0.1 release and we are releasing 4.0.2 with breaking change in Hook
return method (but with easy switch back to old behaviour) to complete
the transition to common DBApi functionality.

Also Exasol fixes "common" behaviours and Zendesk has a new connection
type added.

Airflow Providers are available at:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/airflow/providers/

*apache-airflow-providers-<PROVIDER>-*.tar.gz* are the binary
 Python "sdist" release - they are also official "sources" for the
provider packages.

*apache_airflow_providers_<PROVIDER>-*.whl are the binary
 Python "wheel" release.

The test procedure for PMC members who would like to test the RC
candidates are described in
https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/main/dev/README_RELEASE_PROVIDER_PACKAGES.md#verify-the-release-by-pmc-members

and for Contributors:

https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/main/dev/README_RELEASE_PROVIDER_PACKAGES.md#verify-by-contributors


Public keys are available at:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/airflow/KEYS

Please vote accordingly:

[ ] +1 approve
[ ] +0 no opinion
[ ] -1 disapprove with the reason


Only votes from PMC members are binding, but members of the community are
encouraged to test the release and vote with "(non-binding)".

Please note that the version number excludes the 'rcX' string.
This will allow us to rename the artifact without modifying
the artifact checksums when we actually release.

The status of testing the providers by the community is kept here:
https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/28036

You can find packages as well as detailed changelog following the below links:

https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-zendesk/4.2.0rc1/
https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-snowflake/4.0.2rc1/
https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-exasol/4.1.2rc1/

Cheers,
J.

Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers prepared on December 1st, 2022 (RC1)

[Dennis Akpenyi <de...@gmail.com>]

+1 non-binding

On Fri, Dec 2, 2022 at 11:39 AM Ash Berlin-Taylor <as...@apache.org> wrote:

> +1 binding
>
> On 2 December 2022 10:00:19 GMT, Phani Kumar
> <ph...@astronomer.io.INVALID> wrote:
>>
>> +1 non-binding
>>
>> On Fri, Dec 2, 2022 at 3:12 PM Pankaj Koti
>> <pa...@astronomer.io.invalid> wrote:
>>
>>> +1 non-binding.
>>>
>>> Tested the Snowflake RC and our DAG ran fine with it.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Pankaj Koti
>>>
>>> *Senior Software Engineer, *OSS Engineering Team.
>>> Location: Pune, India
>>>
>>> Timezone: Indian Standard Time (IST)
>>>
>>> Email: pankaj.koti@astronomer.io
>>>
>>> Mobile: +91 9730079985
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, Dec 2, 2022 at 1:32 AM Kaxil Naik <ka...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> +1 binding
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, 1 Dec 2022 at 18:53, <ep...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> +1 binding
>>>>>
>>>>> > On 1 Dec 2022, at 17:02, Jed Cunningham <je...@apache.org>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>> >
>>>>> > 
>>>>> > +1 (binding)
>>>>> >
>>>>> > Checked signatures, checksums, licences
>>>>>
>>>>

Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers prepared on December 1st, 2022 (RC1)

[Ash Berlin-Taylor <as...@apache.org>]

+1 binding 

On 2 December 2022 10:00:19 GMT, Phani Kumar <ph...@astronomer.io.INVALID> wrote:
>+1 non-binding
>
>On Fri, Dec 2, 2022 at 3:12 PM Pankaj Koti
><pa...@astronomer.io.invalid> wrote:
>
>> +1 non-binding.
>>
>> Tested the Snowflake RC and our DAG ran fine with it.
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>>
>>
>> Pankaj Koti
>>
>> *Senior Software Engineer, *OSS Engineering Team.
>> Location: Pune, India
>>
>> Timezone: Indian Standard Time (IST)
>>
>> Email: pankaj.koti@astronomer.io
>>
>> Mobile: +91 9730079985
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Dec 2, 2022 at 1:32 AM Kaxil Naik <ka...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> +1 binding
>>>
>>> On Thu, 1 Dec 2022 at 18:53, <ep...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> +1 binding
>>>>
>>>> > On 1 Dec 2022, at 17:02, Jed Cunningham <je...@apache.org>
>>>> wrote:
>>>> >
>>>> > 
>>>> > +1 (binding)
>>>> >
>>>> > Checked signatures, checksums, licences
>>>>
>>>

Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers prepared on December 1st, 2022 (RC1)

[Phani Kumar <ph...@astronomer.io.INVALID>]

+1 non-binding

On Fri, Dec 2, 2022 at 3:12 PM Pankaj Koti
<pa...@astronomer.io.invalid> wrote:

> +1 non-binding.
>
> Tested the Snowflake RC and our DAG ran fine with it.
>
> Regards,
>
>
>
> Pankaj Koti
>
> *Senior Software Engineer, *OSS Engineering Team.
> Location: Pune, India
>
> Timezone: Indian Standard Time (IST)
>
> Email: pankaj.koti@astronomer.io
>
> Mobile: +91 9730079985
>
>
> On Fri, Dec 2, 2022 at 1:32 AM Kaxil Naik <ka...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> +1 binding
>>
>> On Thu, 1 Dec 2022 at 18:53, <ep...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> +1 binding
>>>
>>> > On 1 Dec 2022, at 17:02, Jed Cunningham <je...@apache.org>
>>> wrote:
>>> >
>>> > 
>>> > +1 (binding)
>>> >
>>> > Checked signatures, checksums, licences
>>>
>>

Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers prepared on December 1st, 2022 (RC1)

[Pankaj Koti <pa...@astronomer.io.INVALID>]

+1 non-binding.

Tested the Snowflake RC and our DAG ran fine with it.

Regards,



Pankaj Koti

*Senior Software Engineer, *OSS Engineering Team.
Location: Pune, India

Timezone: Indian Standard Time (IST)

Email: pankaj.koti@astronomer.io

Mobile: +91 9730079985


On Fri, Dec 2, 2022 at 1:32 AM Kaxil Naik <ka...@gmail.com> wrote:

> +1 binding
>
> On Thu, 1 Dec 2022 at 18:53, <ep...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> +1 binding
>>
>> > On 1 Dec 2022, at 17:02, Jed Cunningham <je...@apache.org>
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > 
>> > +1 (binding)
>> >
>> > Checked signatures, checksums, licences
>>
>

Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers prepared on December 1st, 2022 (RC1)

[Kaxil Naik <ka...@gmail.com>]

+1 binding

On Thu, 1 Dec 2022 at 18:53, <ep...@gmail.com> wrote:

> +1 binding
>
> > On 1 Dec 2022, at 17:02, Jed Cunningham <je...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> >
> > 
> > +1 (binding)
> >
> > Checked signatures, checksums, licences
>

Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers prepared on December 1st, 2022 (RC1)

[ep...@gmail.com]

+1 binding 

> On 1 Dec 2022, at 17:02, Jed Cunningham <je...@apache.org> wrote:
> 
> 
> +1 (binding)
> 
> Checked signatures, checksums, licences

Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers prepared on December 1st, 2022 (RC1)

[Jed Cunningham <je...@apache.org>]

+1 (binding)

Checked signatures, checksums, licences