You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@stdcxx.apache.org by Martin Sebor <se...@roguewave.com> on 2006/02/07 00:10:47 UTC

bug in unique_copy?

I just noticed the bug report below. Our implementation fails
the supplied test case just like (apparently) libstc++ must.
It would be good to look into it and open an issue if it is
in fact a bug:

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26133

Re: bug in unique_copy?

Posted by Martin Sebor <se...@roguewave.com>.
Marc Schoolderman wrote:

> Martin Sebor wrote:
> 
>> Anton, could you take a look at this when you have chance?
>> If you agree that there is a problem with our implementation
>> of the algorithm, could you also open a bug report so we don't
>> forget to fix it?
> 
> 
> Since I submitted the original bug report to gcc and am lurking here, I 
> think I should point out that a new library DR has been submitted for 
> this issue as well:
> 
> http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#538
> 
> Fixes to the library should probably keep an eye on that one.

Thanks for the heads up! We will be discussing this issue later
this week at the committee meeting so I'll definitely keep an
eye on it :)

Martin

Re: bug in unique_copy?

Posted by Marc Schoolderman <sq...@alumina.nl>.
Martin Sebor wrote:
> Anton, could you take a look at this when you have chance?
> If you agree that there is a problem with our implementation
> of the algorithm, could you also open a bug report so we don't
> forget to fix it?

Since I submitted the original bug report to gcc and am lurking here, I 
think I should point out that a new library DR has been submitted for 
this issue as well:

http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#538

Fixes to the library should probably keep an eye on that one.

Regards,
Marc.

Re: bug in unique_copy?

Posted by Martin Sebor <se...@roguewave.com>.
Anton, could you take a look at this when you have chance?
If you agree that there is a problem with our implementation
of the algorithm, could you also open a bug report so we don't
forget to fix it?

Thanks
Martin

Martin Sebor wrote:

> I just noticed the bug report below. Our implementation fails
> the supplied test case just like (apparently) libstc++ must.
> It would be good to look into it and open an issue if it is
> in fact a bug:
> 
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26133