JASPI

[David Jencks <da...@yahoo.com>]

It looks like JASPI (jsr-196) has been approved and I think we should  
finish implementing it.  Guillaume already implemented the spec jar  
from an earlier draft and I updated it recently to the pfd2 spec.   
Guillaume also started an implementation that I started moving into  
geronimo-security.

I opened GERONIMO-3417 to track this activity.  This could be a  
substantial amount of work for one person so help would be extremely  
welcome.

I assume that since the spec has been  approved there must be a tck  
for it.  How do we get it?

I also note that on the approval ballot there are 4 yes votes that  
indicate that lack of a FOU restriction was a factor in the vote  
decision.  This appears to support apaches position on the jck for  
harmony, and I wonder if it would be appropriate to point these  
comments out on legal-discuss?

thanks
david jencks

Re: JASPI

[Kevan Miller <ke...@gmail.com>]

On Aug 15, 2007, at 8:52 PM, David Jencks wrote:

> It looks like JASPI (jsr-196) has been approved and I think we  
> should finish implementing it.  Guillaume already implemented the  
> spec jar from an earlier draft and I updated it recently to the  
> pfd2 spec.  Guillaume also started an implementation that I started  
> moving into geronimo-security.

Sounds good.

>
> I opened GERONIMO-3417 to track this activity.  This could be a  
> substantial amount of work for one person so help would be  
> extremely welcome.

You could probably twist my arm to lend a hand...

>
> I assume that since the spec has been  approved there must be a tck  
> for it.  How do we get it?

Not sure if this needs to come from Geir or Jeff G. Jeff, can you get  
the tck?

>
> I also note that on the approval ballot there are 4 yes votes that  
> indicate that lack of a FOU restriction was a factor in the vote  
> decision.  This appears to support apaches position on the jck for  
> harmony, and I wonder if it would be appropriate to point these  
> comments out on legal-discuss?

I think those style of comments have become somewhat standard (at  
least I've seen them on several votes). Doesn't hurt to point them  
out, but I'm pretty sure they've seen them...

--kevan