You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@rocketmq.apache.org by yukon <yu...@apache.org> on 2017/06/26 07:41:44 UTC
[DISCUSS] Thoughts about a messaging components podling
Hi guys,
John opened a thread in general@incubator to seek interested parties for a
messaging components podling.
I learned that this podling focus on core, reusable messaging components, such
as benchmark, common api specification, wire protocol bridge and so on.
IMO, it's a great idea, since there are many messaging solutions in ASF or
other places.
More info please refer to here:
1. Ongoing discussion on ActiveMQ community,
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/ff3ffb0408d299724caadbfb6e3c373e74d5d16def9af0c1a8fd8db9@%3Cdev.activemq.apache.org%3E
2. Ongoing discussion on incubator community,
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/14bdf3d93c8c6ac3ac7dd9c1d6e6146fd90991581d80e8c6cfaf9540@%3Cgeneral.incubator.apache.org%3E
So I opened a thread in our rocketmq community, let's discuss at here if
you have any thoughts about this project.
Regards,
yukon
Re: [DISCUSS] Thoughts about a messaging components podling
Posted by Zhanhui Li <li...@gmail.com>.
Hi,
Indeed, it will be ideal if we could build some reusable messaging components as guava for Java and curator for zookeeper. One of the key points, IMO, is how we define a common/shared component given those products follow different protocols and have different domain models. Identifying the common modules shared by majority of messaging products should, therefore, be a starting point.
The first shared concept that pops out of my mind is message filtering.
> 在 2017年6月26日,下午3:41,yukon <yu...@apache.org> 写道:
>
> Hi guys,
>
> John opened a thread in general@incubator to seek interested parties for a
> messaging components podling.
>
> I learned that this podling focus on core, reusable messaging components, such
> as benchmark, common api specification, wire protocol bridge and so on.
>
> IMO, it's a great idea, since there are many messaging solutions in ASF or
> other places.
>
> More info please refer to here:
> 1. Ongoing discussion on ActiveMQ community,
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/ff3ffb0408d299724caadbfb6e3c373e74d5d16def9af0c1a8fd8db9@%3Cdev.activemq.apache.org%3E
> 2. Ongoing discussion on incubator community,
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/14bdf3d93c8c6ac3ac7dd9c1d6e6146fd90991581d80e8c6cfaf9540@%3Cgeneral.incubator.apache.org%3E
>
> So I opened a thread in our rocketmq community, let's discuss at here if
> you have any thoughts about this project.
>
> Regards,
> yukon